SPECIAL FEATURES:
10 strange ways we protect endangered species: Freezing DNA
Photo:
dra_schwartz/iStockphoto
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.

bermudababy
Sep 23 2010 at 5:43 PM
How are these advances in genetic technology being created and tested? Are we hurting those that still exist or are we really helping. How many suffer, get sick or die while attempting to prove that these are viable naturally functional brain cells? Aren't we creating a genetic defect in the process?

Jonathan
Feb 15 2013 at 1:35 PM
Scientists who do environmental research in biology (as opposed to pharmaceutical companies, etc.) typically tend to be extremely ethically-minded people. I can definitely see the urge to group these two types of scientist together, but it's like the difference between bespoke tailoring and sweatshop manufacture. Usually when this sort of genetic research is done on endangered species, it's because the scientists are certain, to a very respectable margin, that it will help the species survive
.... More
better as a result -- otherwise they'd use more common animals. These scientists adore diversity, and it would pain them immensely if they caused inadvertent damage to their realm of study. So, in a nutshell, your concern definitely shows that you're a conscientious human being, and I'm glad to be able to point out that scientific ethics has come a long way and as long as people like you still care, scientists won't have to default to working at places like Monsanto.













Email

Join the conversation