Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Saturday, May 25, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Earth Matters › Animals
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
Finally answered! Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
The granddaddy of causality dilemmas has a solution, and we’ve got the simple science to explain it.

By

Melissa Breyer
Mon, Feb 11 2013 at 6:25 PM
 13

Related Topics:

Birds, Science

Photo: Vladimir Prusakov/Shutterstock

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The chicken, no the egg, no the chicken, no the egg. It's enough to make your head spin right off your neck. We’ve all been through the logic; most of us end up at the same place. As Luna Lovegood, the dreamy yet dotty witch from Harry Potter put it when asked the riddle, "a circle has no beginning." And indeed, attempting to identify the first case of a circular cause and consequence is an exercise in utter futility. For those who don’t have a pat story involving a divine being who spits out perfectly formed species, it's a no-win situation.
 
But that doesn’t stop us from asking. Luckily for people kept awake at night by such quandaries, NPR’s Robert Krulwich recently got to the bottom of the dilemma when he, thankfully, stumbled across the video below.
 
Basically, many, many moons ago there was a chicken-like bird. It was genetically close to a chicken, but wasn’t a full-blown chicken yet. Krulwich calls it a proto-chicken. So proto-hen laid an egg, and proto-rooster fertilized it. But when the genes from ma and pa almost-chicken fused, they combined in a new way, creating a mutation that accidently made the baby different from its parents. Although it would take millennia for the difference to be noticed, that egg was different enough to become the official progenitor of a new species, now known as … the chicken! So in a nutshell (or an eggshell, if you like), two birds that weren’t really chickens created a chicken egg, and hence, we have an answer: The egg came first, and then it hatched a chicken.
 
Maybe the question we should be asking is: Which came first, the proto-chicken or the proto-chicken egg?
 
 
Related story on MNN: Mystery of lost homing pigeons finally solved

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 13
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
JoanHerronSanLwin
Joan Herron San Lwin Mar 17 2013 at 9:18 AM

God created the process.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Rachel Mar 01 2013 at 5:05 AM

Interesting stuff

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Sarah Feb 15 2013 at 2:53 PM

God created the chicken which means the chicken came first

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
fauzibowo37
Setyo Widodo Feb 15 2013 at 12:06 PM

God created the chicken, not egg.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
tymmac Feb 15 2013 at 9:20 AM

We still don't know why it crossed the road.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
Kym
Kym Feb 12 2013 at 6:43 PM

Well you do learn something everyday! I honestly thought it was the chicken that came first, Now l know Interesting stuff

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Think Feb 12 2013 at 2:22 PM

No, the Chicken came first. The egg that was laid by the proto chicken was a proto chicken's egg, not a chicken's egg. Therefore there had to be a chicken before there could ever be a chicken's egg.

Its a matter of semantics. But if you really want to get to the heart of the issue, (as it is worded) the egg came first. Eggs existed long before there were chickens or even proto chickens.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Dave Feb 16 2013 at 5:04 PM
But the question as I have always heard it is, "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?', not "which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg?". It may be a minor distinction but it is an important enough distinction to be more than a matter of semantics. They are two very different questions, both of which you have answered correctly. Perhaps we should be asking a more interesting question: From whence came the first egg? That will, of course, immediately lead to a protracted
.... More
discussion of what we mean by "egg", so perhaps we should ask specifically "From whence came the first hard shelled egg", or something to that effect. Can we ever really know the answer to either of those questions?
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Penny Zebrapants Feb 12 2013 at 2:17 PM

I knew... all these years people called me a freak or a lunatic but i knew it.. ha Sherly Blackburn Im not crazy!!!!!!!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Emma Feb 12 2013 at 12:18 PM

This isn't news. Anyone who took biology in high school already knew this.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Feb 11 2013 at 7:48 PM

God created all the animals, so the chucken came first

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
tymmac Feb 15 2013 at 9:21 AM

Does chucken taste like chicken?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Dave Feb 12 2013 at 1:44 PM
Why must we assume that God's first attempt at creating anything results in the ultimate, perfect end product? Why can't God have a "continuous improvement plan" like any other product creator and manufacturer? Biological evolution is a wonderfully elegant and complex continuous improvement plan, worthy of any supreme being capable of creating life. As such, the fact of biological evolution speaks volumes in favour of there being a God, rather than being evidence against the existence
.... More
of God. Viewed in that context, God created the life that created the egg that created - through the divinely inspired continuous improvement process we call evolution - the chicken that hatched from the egg. The egg still came first, but it has nothing to do with disproving the existence of God. Quite the contrary, in fact. If God didn't create evolution, who did?
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Log in or register to post comments

EDITORS' PICKS

tease weird things

line

tease cellars

line

tease fishing

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. Student science experiment finds plants won't grow near Wi-Fi router
  2. The 9 nastiest things in your supermarket
  3. Archaeologists unearth 5,000-year-old 'third-gender' caveman
  4. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  5. Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
  6. Is that snake venomous?
  7. 10 false facts most people think are true
  8. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  9. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  10. 15 houseplants to improve indoor air quality
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS