Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Thursday, May 23, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Earth Matters › Animals
Infographic: Troubled tigers
As one Year of the Tiger comes to an end, experts are racing to stop the big cats from going extinct by the next one in 2022.

By:

Russell McLendon
Wed, Jan 26 2011 at 10:36 AM
 11

Related Topics:

Conservation, Endangered Species, Habitats, Wild Animals, Infographic
 
Also on MNN:
  • Tigers could be extinct in 12 years, experts say
  • Leonardo DiCaprio donates $1M for tiger conservation
  • Photos: Painting the last South China tiger
  • Video: Salvaging a habitat for tigers
  • 'Tiger Mom' on 'Today Show': People take me too seriously
  • See more MNN infographics
 

You might also like:

anonymous
Ken Jan 30 2011 at 7:10 PM

Even the most learned atheistic scientist has to give pause to the notion that the existence of tigers is a random event.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Jason Glugla Jan 30 2011 at 3:10 PM

As you are buying more goods from China, think of all the good you are doing. Besides the death of America you are also funding the extinction of Tigers, Sharks and a multitude of other species used in Chinese snakeoil medicine. Don't let any of those thoughts weigh on your conscience though if you have one.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Chris Jan 26 2011 at 5:47 PM

Educational and entertaining... How else could you get Tiger Woods, the Tiger Mom, and Tony the Tiger in the same graphic? Very nicely organized and researched.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
slo_lane_cycler's picture
slo_lane_cycler Jan 26 2011 at 4:00 PM
$330 Million. Wow. Admittedly I am far from a learned scholar on the issue of animal conservation costs and expenses, but anyone with a right mind can attest to the fact that this is a staggering figure to say the least. Having read this, I am still left with a few questions: (1) Why tigers? Don't get me wrong here and I feel almost selfish to be asking this question, but is there a usefulness to their existence other than their contribution to the natural order of their habitats like any other animal? (2)
.... More
How much is being spent on conservation efforts of species like fish along coastal fishing regions such as the Atlantic Ocean. a dwindling population that also serves as a potential food source. I'd be glad to learn more about either of these subjects if anyone cares to post a useful link. Thanks. p.s. love the infographic. educational and fun to read.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Gapt Mar 04 2011 at 2:25 PM
Money! Is that all you care about? On your death bed will money, a man matter object mean a thing to you or will enjoying the bounty of this beautiful land in which we share a vast array of other species that sadly as our population explode—we cause other species to go extinct. Why save the Tiger? Because they were here before us and deserve to continue on. Don't you see their beauty, the awe? How about you take the time to look up what's being done about fish stocks afterall you sound like you're
.... More
part of the reason our oceans are in trouble. How arrogant of you to only care about yourself and the other animals you eat. I cannot wait till small-minded morons like you go extinct. There are countless people and organizations around the world fighting to protect countless other species from going extinct including fish. Look up biodiversity and see why the most selfish animal on Earth (humans) cannot survive if we continue to wipe out every other species on the planet. We need Tigers, we need Chimpanzees, we need Frogs...
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Joe Blow Jan 30 2011 at 2:14 PM

What is your usefulness? Maybe we should destroy you?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Bob Jan 30 2011 at 11:33 PM

Joe Blow, what a ridiculous comeback. The man has a right to question this, no matter how much you may disagree. What is wrong with you?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Environmentala Feb 14 2011 at 12:11 AM

As much as Joe Blow's comment might not strike anyone as being "nice" enough, I think that the point that he's trying to make is that humans have a funny way of thinking that their existence on this planet is more relevant or important than that of creatures in the wild. In fact, the opposite is true. Humans are the only species on Earth whose lack of presence would actually improve the condition of the planet.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
wildlife fisher... Jan 30 2011 at 1:20 PM
Tigers, being a top predator, require large areas of territory to meet their requirements for survival and more to thrive. They are not adaptable in such a way that would allow them to coexist closely with humans, so the habitat needs to be either pristine or have very little human activity other than wildlife tourism. Because of this they are known as a "keystone" species. When efforts are taken to save a keystone species, countless other smaller or less noticed species of animals and plants are
.... More
preserved as well. This is because the tiger's prey, as well as the plants they feed on, and all the animals that live in the same area and all the plants that share the same area will also be preserved. So, for example, maybe there is some kind of highly endangered insect that lives in the same habitat as tigers but they are so small that no significant area will be set aside for them. Also a tiger, being beautiful or cute, can garner huge amounts of sympathy that simply could not be had by a weird looking bug or a tree. Then, by virtue of the tiger's habitat being preserved, many of these other species can be preserved as well. Reducing poaching of tigers also reduces poaching of other species, such as endangered antelopes or one horned rhinos, and also reduces the environmental damage of higher numbers of humans moving around in the habitat damaging ecosystems and causing erosion. As for fisheries worldwide, the unfortunate fact is that in order to fully protect them, many different and varying agencies must work together and sometimes that requires certain industries to completely halt their activities in areas that contribute to the downfall of a particular species. For example, salmon fisheries are not just impacted by overfishing, but also by diseases spread by farmed salmon, loss of habitat from dams and water diversion for agricultural and urban use, logging which increases erosion and therefore sediments in the water where the salmon spawn and grow up (detrimental to their health), mining and industry which release pollutants into the water, and even sewage treatment which releases water that is unsuitable for them. It is very difficult to get all these diverse groups to work together at all, much less to make some major sacrifices for something they don't realize a direct benefit from. This is what makes it very hard to protect salmon fisheries, and fisheries in general, and does not include the fact that most oceanic fisheries do not fall within clear national boundaries so it also involves the cooperation of every country which would have an interest in fishing that species. Most people who eat fish do not realize how global a fish really is, and how many other human activities that do not seem related are actually directly affecting the fishes of the world. The best way to help is to donate to organizations that try to preserve or rebuild fisheries by involving all the different groups, and to eat no fish or only fish that is marked with the green "safe" and/or "sustainable" marker that is found in the guide for seafood - usually available at aquariums and ocean science centeres. There is a very good one put out by the Monterey Bay Aquarium and it is also online. I hope this information was useful.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
nano Jan 30 2011 at 9:21 AM
You raise some very good points. Unfortunately, it's not just the tiger that may go extinct in the wild by 2020 or so; lions could, as well. I remember thinking a long time ago that once poachers run out of tigers for "medical parts," the market will switch to lions. Well, that's what happened. Add to that poisoning of big cats by farmers who can't afford to lose livestock, habitat loss, hunting of male lions and male tigers ("alpha" males), and the result is tragic for females and young cubs. As
.... More
for fish populations, I've been very concerned about fish like cod, stripped bass, horseshoe crab. Cod were fished to near extinction, stripers are stressed by infection due to pollution in the Chesapeake Bay, and horseshoe crab is critical for red knot plovers. Those little birds may soon go extinct due to plummeting crab population (the crabs aren't as overfished now, but it may be too late for the red knot). It may be that by conserving the big cats and other apex predators (for the ocean, this would include bluefin tuna and sharks), we can help other species as well. This can only happen if we preserve entire habitats (e.g, the species that the big cats require, limit on take of predator fish, land use, etc.).
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
MP Jan 29 2011 at 11:00 PM

They have as much right to be here as any of us.
Why tigers? Who are we to question there existence.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

Join the conversation

Comments: 11
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Log in or register to post comments
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS