Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Saturday, May 18, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Earth Matters › Animals
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
Study questions current evolutionary beliefs about birds
Did dinosaurs evolve from birds or birds from dinos?

By

Katy Rank Lev
Thu, Feb 11 2010 at 9:43 AM

Related Topics:

Extinction, Research & Innovation, Science

DINO DISCOVERY: New research sheds new light on the evolutionary path of dinosaurs and birds. (Photo: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

 
What if dinosaurs didn’t evolve to become birds? e! Science News reports that a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests dinosaurs might actually have evolved from birds and not the other way around, as is commonly believed. Oregon State University zoology professor John Ruben offers commentary about the study, which tested a new specimen of raptor fossil discovered in 2003. The PNAS study concluded that the “small, feathered species must have been a ‘glider’ that came down from trees.”
 
The general and long-held belief that raptors and other ground-dwelling dinosaurs eventually became birds is brought into question by the research, which Ruben says offers sound evidence that birds eventually became certain types of dinosaurs. For instance, the velociraptor so prominent in Jurassic Park might actually have been a flightless bird.
 
Analysis of the feathers on the “microraptor’s” four limbs suggests that the dinosaur probably couldn’t have taken off for ground-up flight, but were probably gliding from trees, “somewhat like a modern-day flying squirrel.” Ruben says this analysis makes it improbable that dinosaurs one day took to the skies but, rather, that birds one day touched down and stayed put, eventually becoming dinosaurs.
 
According to Ruben, the “who came first” dino/bird debate is far from over. Oregon State University has been conducting dinosaur evolution research for 20 years and Ruben suggests that birds and dinosaurs might “have had an ancient, common ancestor … but they evolved separately on their own path.”
 
The PNAS study combined with Ruben’s work and a study from Florida State University give weight to the new theory that birds were the predecessors. Ruben’s own work identified certain bones and muscles affecting lung capacity for long flight that are missing in certain ground-dwelling dinosaurs. According to e! Science News, other studies have identified bird fossils that are actually older than the dinosaurs they theoretically descended from. Ruben ends his commentary in PNAS with a critical eye toward “current notions” of evolution and the fossil record, urging us to continue to question beliefs about the evolutionary process of dinosaurs.

 

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comment: 1
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
DK Fennell Feb 11 2010 at 5:32 PM
I have been watching the press release from Oregon State touting Dr Ruben's commentary in PNAS fly all over the net. It is a better publicity barrage than his attempt last June when his study was actually published. This current writing is not a study but rather a commentary. Nevertheless, he uses his comments on a Kansas model of a gliding animal to trash other more conventional theories than his own. And why? Because he says that birds could not have descended from ground dwelling therapods
.... More
because the model suggest that this animal glided from trees. But let me ask a simple question here. Whatever animals birds descended from, didn't they have to be ground-dwelling? Or did bird descend from insects? Or was there some lineage of tree dwelling reptiles that he is positing? Is there any evidence for any of this? Dr Ruben makes a broad claim from thin evidence. And yet he makes some snarky comments about his colleagues who don't agree with him. To me his arguments would be more acceptable if they weren't dressed up in the self-promotion of the OSU press relations machine.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Log in or register to post comments

EDITORS' PICKS

tease early bird

line

tease energy sources

line

tease dog tricks

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. A day in the life of the human hand
  2. How to bike to work (or anywhere else)
  3. Why banning candy is a road to nowhere
  4. 15 houseplants to improve indoor air quality
  5. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  6. 10 false facts most people think are true
  7. 5 mind-bending facts about dreams
  8. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  9. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  10. Tattoos for the edgy environmentalist
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS