MNN.COM > Earth Matters > Climate Change

Global warming guru

RealClimate blogger Gavin Schmidt says the public hungers for better and more information on climate change.
By PlentyMag.com
Tue, Apr 14 2009 at 1:52 PM EST
Read more: GLOBAL WARMING

Al Gore makes it look easy, but understanding the finer points of global warming is hard. For a little more than two years, RealClimate has offered meaty posts about the latest research and controversy in climate news, written by 11 climate scientists. Plenty chatted with NASA atmospheric scientist Gavin Schmidt, one of the blog’s founders, about how his field is covered—by Hollywood, Congress, and the popular press.
 
The name RealClimate suggests that a lot of what people read is about a “fake” climate.
Absolutely, yes! I came up with the name. And that’s exactly right. You don’t get medical advice from your mechanic, car advice from the baker, recipe tips form the school crossing guard. If you want to know about climate science, you ask climate scientists.
 
How did RealClimate start?
It was at the end of 2004. As climate change was moving up on the agenda, it seemed obvious that the mainstream scientific community was getting its *** kicked in terms of the use of science in the public discourse. People were publishing all sorts of rubbish, and nobody was pointing out how illegitimate it was. People were abusing the science left, right, and center.
 
Earlier that year there had just been that movie, The Day After Tomorrow, and the climate science community had a very confused response to that. So over that summer I and some like-minded colleagues were thinking, how could we do it better? It was definitely the summer of the blog, and we thought, that’s a good way of doing this rapid reaction, of being able to educate journalists.
 
Why target journalists?  
I’m not so silly as to believe that having one blog is going to re-educate the entire populous. It’s good for scientists to sometimes talk directly the public, but I don’t think that’s ever going to be the dominant mode of information transport. Reporting science in general in the popular media is very difficult: not having a shared context from which to work, having to start from scratch with every story, only having a couple of columns to explain something tricky. Most reporting is done by press releases, which make everything much more dramatic. What we’re trying to do is provide the context so that journalists won’t be starting from scratch every single time. And from the feedback we’ve gotten so far, it’s actually worked quite well.
 
I’ll say! Technorati ranks you guys at 866 out of millions of blogs. Did RealClimate take off right from the beginning?
It’s been a pretty steady climb. This month was our biggest month ever. We get roughly 30 or 40 thousand unique visitors a day. It’s quite gratifying. When we first started we’d get lots of abusive, non-substantive comments. Now we just delete those straight away. We think of it as a party at our house: we’re willing to talk to people, but when they start to get drunk and break things, they get asked to leave.
 
Has media coverage of climate change improved?
Up until recently, stories on climate change were all about the controversy over what the science says. Now, I think I’m detecting a shift much more towards, ‘OK, the science is in, what does it mean? What’s going to happen in the future? How can we do anything about it?’ Those stories I think are much more interesting.  
 
A recent article in The New York Times said Al Gore exaggerated the science in An Inconvenient Truth. What did you think of the film?  
I thought it was great. I saw it in a packed theatre in New York City. These are just civilians, watching it, intrigued. It’s the most science they’ve been shown since they left school, and nobody fell asleep. If it had been me presenting it, the science would have been a little more nuanced, but then nobody would have watched it.
 
Has there been any reaction from the Bush administration about your blogging?
Never. There was that hearing last week with Jim Hanson talking about NASA’s suppression of links to media—that was all going on the same time that I was blogging continuously and yet nobody said anything to me. That was odd. All the things that he alleged were true. For awhile there they tried to insist that every time I talked to a reporter, I’d have to dial into some conference line to make sure that somebody in public affairs could make sure to listen in, but I refused to have anything to do with the system. The new NASA policy is that we can talk to anybody we want to.
 
Story by Victoria Hughes. This article originally appeared in "Plenty" in April 2007.
 
Copyright Environ Press 2007


CLOSE link:

Comments(4)

Sort by:
Posted By quicknthedead - Sat, Apr 18 2009 at 11:00 PM EST

RealClimate Is No Longer

Very interesting. I read your piece here today, and decided to go check out RealClimate's site. Unfortunately for the Global Warming Proponents, it has shut down because it has come to the correct conclusion that global warming is unfounded. Yes, that's right, folks. It's a hoax, which can be readily discovered if you examine the science.

Check it out for yourself. Go visit RealClimate website. It's link is in the beginning of your article above.

Posted By Brad Arnold - Thu, Apr 16 2009 at 3:51 AM EST

Beware: melting methane hydrate

What has me worried is the underestimation in the climate science community over the dangers of melting methane hydrate, which aren't included in current climate models. Here is a quick rundown:

Microbes that digest carbon in the absence of oxygen sometimes produce methane (the biological process is called "methanogenesis"). Some of that methane gets caught in ice. There is more carbon inside ice (methane hydrate) than all the oil, coal, and natural gas! Methane is a super duper.... More

Posted By Anonymous - Thu, Apr 16 2009 at 12:26 AM EST

VG

The clue is 11 "Climate scientist" who have a vested interest in an untested science and use computer games to speculate "what, and if, etc". All real surface and atmospheric temperature and ice data is now contrary to their original thesis that the world would continue to warm up due to AGW. It just ain't happening. I could not bothered to list the mounting evidence here... just go to "watts up with that" (best science blog, 2009), run by qualified meteorologists and atmospheric scientist..... More

Posted By Fernando Magyar - Wed, Apr 15 2009 at 5:53 PM EST

Shallow Climate Science?

I find it somewhat intriguing that right above the link that brought me here from The Oil Drum site is another one that links to this article "Shallow Science Criticized by Global Warming Experts" However they cite two individuals namely, Willie Soon, a Harvard University astrophysicist and John Sununu, former governor of New Hampshire, former chief of staff to President George H.W. Bush, and holder of a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering,... M'Kay as the global warming experts? I'm sure that Dr..... More

Add your comment

You can't fool Mother Nature
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

ADVERTISEMENT

FROM OUR SPONSOR

Want to Make Medicines Greener? It’s in the Chemistry Freiburg: Taking Action on Climate Change
Making it Personal: Reducing Carbon on the Home Front in Ireland Geothermal Heating “Rocks” in Sweden

SHEA'S RECENT POSTS

POLITICS, ENERGY, AND OUR EARTH'S RESOURCES
+ add this to my site

MNN ORIGINALS

Not sure which green way is best? Get answers from our experts.

Is your dog the Green Dog of the Year? Nominate your dog today.

Government data you need to know, in a way you can understand.

Check out eco-photos of the week, top 10 lists and more.

Learn more about everything from acid rain to wildlife.