Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Wednesday, June 19, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › MNN BLOGGERS
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
TV weatherman caught promoting false information about climate change
'Forecast the Facts' calls out 47 well-known TV weatherman for deliberately misleading the public on climate change.
Tue, Jan 24 2012 at 12:36 AM
 6

Related Topics:

Global Warming, Weather & Climate, Climate Change
Hurricane from space.

Creative Commons: NASA, 2011

2011 broke nearly every storm record there was to be broken, and it was the first time in recorded history we've had two years in a row with more than 18 storms in the hurricane season. But if you were to listen to the TV weather reports of Justin Berk of WMAR-TV in Baltimore, or Bob Breck of WVUE-TV New Orleans, or Dave Dahl of KSTP-TV Minneapolis you would think this was nothing to be alarmed about.
 
These and dozens of other weatherman across the nation do not believe in climate change. Yes that's right -- weathermen (and yes they are all men as noted by ThinkProgress) the guys who are supposed to know the most about what causes weather -- seem to be in denial about the overwhelming scientific concensus on climate change. 
 
This is a very unfortunate thing. A recent report shows that TV meterologists are the primary source of information for the American public about climate change. And with quotes like this one from James Spann of WBMA-TV Birmingham -- “The Earth’s climate has changed since the day God put it here. We’ve had these cyclical changes, and I believe most of this is purely natural.” -- it's no wonder people have been confused. 
 
Now a new campaign called Forecast the Facts created by 350.org, the League of Conservation Voters, and Citizen Engagement Lab, is calling out these science-impaired weathermen, and calling for the American Meteorological Society (AMS) to adopt a stronger statement on climate change that establishes the proven link between increased storm activity and the warming impacts of greenhouse gas emissions.
 
If you yourself are confused about climate change, get the facts (and watch some entertaining videos) about climate change on the TckTckTck climate campaign website (a site I helped to develop). And if you catch your local TV weatherman lying about climate change, file a complaint. It's time to end their campaign of public misinformation.

The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.

Previous Post
Sharks become supermodels in new TV show
Next Post
Causecast technology to power a new wave of 'employee activism'

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 6
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
ameridaddy Sep 12 2012 at 11:32 AM

Look at the pics of the recent solar coronal mass ejection.
Now, after looking at that, do you Chicken Littles still really think man has caused whatever change their might be, and that man can actually control our climate? And by the way Kurt, what should the temperature be at what spot? I'll betcha some folks in Siberia would like a longer growing season.
Until you can name the numbers, shut up.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Aubrey Urbanowicz Aug 31 2012 at 1:10 AM

I am a Meteorologist who doesn't believe in the alarm of "global warming." You can add my name to the list of others who study weather and science daily... and don't believe the hype.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
cbrtxus Feb 21 2012 at 1:35 PM
Forecast the facts? Or try to assure that citizens hear only one side of a scientific debate? I can understand the frustration of social activists like James Hansen. When people are permitted to hear more than one side of an issue, they are indeed likely to become "confused" and think that there is more than one side to that issue. People can download the temperature data from NOAA, HadCRUT, UAH, RSS, and GISS and plot it themselves using Microsoft Excel. That's what I started doing out of frustration.
.... More
If they do that, they will see that only Hansen's GISS shows any significant warming since 2001. Perhaps people should not be permitted to download such data. There is a danger than the person downloading and plotting the data will become "confused" by what they see with their own "lying" eyes. I'm fine with folks getting the facts. I'm not fine with what is really opinion being stated as fact. If you are looking for a lot of propaganda masquerading as science you should definitely follow this link: http://tcktcktck.org/2011/08/facts-overview/
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Michael A. Lewis Jan 25 2012 at 12:04 AM

Follow the money. Who is funding this attack on metoerologists? What is his motive?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
psam888 Jan 24 2012 at 5:18 PM

@jdey123 - Arctic ice may cover more area for a given time period, but the ice by volume (in other words the thickness) is hitting record lows.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/post/arctic-sea...

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
jdey123 Jan 24 2012 at 6:40 AM
Let's dispel the global warming myth. Antarctic Sea Ice is more extensive today than it has been since records began:-http://tinyurl.com/86z98bo The world hasn’t got any warmer since 1998:-http://tinyurl.com/5t3u7ke There is no correlation between CO2 emissions and global mean temperature since reliable instrument records were produced:-http://tinyurl.com/6uxhkmlhttp://tinyurl.com/6mpq4v2 Global sea level rise is 2mm per year:-http://tinyurl.com/ybz33mw UK (country with longest temperature record
.... More
history) winter’s mean temperature in 2010-11 was the same as it was in 1910-11 and has barely changed in all of the intervening years (select link, choose “Mean Temperature” in “Climate Variable” and “Winter” in “Month/Season/Annual” list boxes:-http://tinyurl.com/7mbpeod Hansen’s predictions are getting wildly inaccurate (scenario B is the light blue line and closest to actual CO2 emissions, black line represents actual temperature’s recorded. Scenario B predicted 0.97C temperature anomaly for 2011, actual observed 0.52c:-http://tinyurl.com/6t9kzaohttp://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A2.txt Scientific advance requires the following to hold true:- i) A hypothesis be postulated ii) A model produced which predicts expected results iii) Observations taken which match the predicted results. If observations do not match predicted results, the hypothesis should be withdrawn. There is no scientific concensus on climate science. The 97% of climate scientists myth comes from a paper written by scientists who believe in global warming, in which they googled for papers and determined for themselves who agreed with them or not. http://www.pnas.org/content/107/27/12107.full The only opinion poll that I'm aware of undertaken by Bray & Storch 2008 reveals a wide range of opinions amonst climate scientists. http://coast.gkss.de/staff/storch/pdf/CliSci2008.pdf
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

EDITORS' PICKS

tease Pope Francis

line

tease tree-dwelling animals

line

tease Internet shaming

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  2. Henry Cavill's 'Man of Steel' workout video
  3. Why I started to eat white rice
  4. Student science experiment finds plants won't grow near Wi-Fi router
  5. Food fraud: 10 counterfeit products we commonly consume
  6. Photos: Hyper-crowded Hong Kong apartments go up, up, up ...
  7. 7 surprising things Pope Francis has done in his first 100 days
  8. 10 false facts most people think are true
  9. 5 mind-bending facts about dreams
  10. 8 hair care treatments you can make yourself
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS