SPECIAL FEATURES:
Email
Iceland volcano eruption unlikely to slow global warming
Large volcanic eruptions cool Earth's climate, but the Icelandic volcano is too small to have much impact.
Fri, Apr 16 2010 at 3:49 PM
Related Topics:
COOL DOWN: Volcanic ash reflects some of the Sun's rays, which helps cool the Earth. (Photo: ZUMA Press)
Big volcanic eruptions have had a cooling effect on Earth's climate, but the Icelandic event is too small to provide any such respite from manmade global warming, scientists said Friday.
The benchmark cooling event of the past 20 years was in 1991, when Mount Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines.
It cooled Earth's surface by 0.9 degrees Fahrenheit (0.5 degrees Celsius) over the next year, enough to offset the impact of greenhouse gases from 1991 to 1993.
A smaller cooling episode occurred in 1980, when Mount St. Helens in the U.S. state of Washington blew its top, an event that while impressive, disgorged only a tenth of the material of Pinatubo.
The chill comes from a simple formula: The volcano spews out a huge amount of fine volcanic ash and sulphur dioxide, which are transported into the high altitude layer known as the stratosphere.
There, chemistry and physics combine, creating a fine layer of whitish particles that for months or years are blown around the Earth and reflect some of the Sun's rays rather than let the radiation reach the ground.
"Basically, it's like putting a reflector shield over the windscreen of your car — you're stopping the inside of the atmosphere getting too warm," said Colin Macpherson of Durham University, northeastern England.
But he and others said the eruption at Iceland's Eyjafjallajokull glacier so far was too small, did not have sufficient sulphur content and its plume circulated at too low an altitude to make an impact.
Any effect will be "very insignificant," said Scylla Sillayo of the World Meteorological Organisation in Geneva.
"At the moment, we are looking at something that's about 100 times smaller than Mount St. Helen's. At the scale it's at now, it's relatively unlikely that it will have any perceptible effect on climate," explained Kathryn Goodenough of the British Geological Survey.
Emmanuel Bocrie of the French weather service, Meteo France, added: "With Pinatubo, ash rose to 18,000 metres (58,500 feet), in the tropics.
"It's not at all the same situation in this case, where the plume is at an average of 6,000 metres (20,000 feet), with peaks of 11,000 metres (35,750 feet). In addition, this is in a zone of the atmosphere where there are powerful winds, which have a huge dispersing effect."
The scientists said the Eyjafjallajokull eruption could have a regional effect on Europe's climate -- but only provided it went on for a matter of years.
"Back in the 1780s, a large eruption in southern Iceland went on for a couple of years and generated a lot of sulphur," said Macpherson.
"It caused a smog that was really rather nasty, there was a failure of crops as a result of acid rain, the air quality was really very poor. But that took the better part of two years to cause that kind of effect and certainly we are not looking at anything like that right now."
Another is a theory — but no more than that — that the present eruption could touch off a far larger, neighbouring volcano called Katla.
From 1821-1823, the present volcano erupted on and off, and at the end of the cycle, Katla erupted.
"People have suggested there may be links between them, through fissures, but it's important to emphasise there is no proof the one would trigger the other," Goodenough said.
Volcanic cooling is in any case only a temporary brake on the effects of manmade greenhouse gases, blamed for stoking dangerous change to the climate system.
Earth's surface temperature rose by 1.3 F (0.74 C) from 1906-2005, the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says. In the last half-century of that period, the warming doubled, to around 0.23 F (0.13 C)glo per decade.
Another downside is that the volcano material in the stratosphere damages Earth's ozone shield against ultraviolet radiation.
Also on MNN: Ice cap thaw may awaken more volcanoes
You might also like:
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
EDITORS' PICKS
Advertisement
TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON
- 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
- Too beautiful to be real? 16 surreal landscapes found on Earth
- 7 surprising things Pope Francis has done in his first 100 days
- Watch: Sir David Attenborough deals with a band of cannibals the British way
- 10 false facts most people think are true
- What a grocery store without bees looks like
- 9 habits that may do more harm than good
- 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
- 'Lost' city discovered beneath Cambodian jungle
- 6 unusual team-building activities
NEWSLETTER
Advertisement
Will you Global warming alarmists ever get over this nonsense. The IPCC and all you fans of Al Gore need to wake up and realize that the Sun, water vapoer (not CO2) and natural forces (such as volcanoes) are far more powerful on affecting our climate than Man. PS - It's the Sun stupid.
Your comment shows that you seem to be uninformed and stupid by saying CO2 is not powerful enough to cause havoc on our climate?
I don't think anyone can give you an answer to that right now. It also depends on from where your flight will be scheduled and which operating company you'll be using.
So far I've heard, some airports in south western europe might open to traffic monday, but to go to Iceland, they will have to circle around the infected areas. Best bet is that you travel to US and from there you go to Iceland, where flights are still operating (as far as I have heard).
Good luck with it.
Any idea when flying will be possible in Europe? I have scheduled some photo shooting session at the Volcano site for my site Phototalkz but I can't get there