• Welcome
  • Community
  • Blogs
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Join
  • Log in
Follow MNN    
MNN - Mother Nature Network - Envrionmental News
improve your world

 

Friday, May 25, 2012
  • Earth Matters

    Browse All » Animals Weather Energy Politics Space Translating Uncle Sam Wilderness & Resources

  • Health

    Browse All » Allergies Fitness & Well-Being Healthy Spaces

  • Lifestyle

    Browse All » Arts & Culture Travel Natural Beauty & Fashion Recycling Responsible Living

  • GREEN TECH

    Browse All » Computers Gadgets & Electronics Research & Innovations Transportation

  • Eco-Biz & Money

    Browse All » Green Workplace Personal Finance Sustainable Business Practices

  • Food & Drink

    Browse All » Beverages Healthy Eating Recipes

  • Your Home

    Browse All » At Home Organic Farming & Gardening Remodeling & Design

  • family

    Browse All » Babies & Pregnancy Family Activities Pets Protection & Safety

Tweet
Pin It
Email Bookmark and ShareShare
WorldShares lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20 points now.
Learn More

Earn Points
What's this?
MNN.COM›

MNN BLOGGERS

Chris Turner

Germany: A cleantech case study for a post-Fukushima world

In the wake of the worst nuclear disaster in a generation, Germany doubled down on a decade of success, pledging to eliminate nukes by 2022 and switch almost exclusively to renewable power by 2050. A report from the front lines.

Tue, Jul 05 2011 at 12:19 PM EST
 32

Brightly colored townhouses in Freiburg, Germany, with roofs shingled in solar panels. NUCLEAR-FREE SUBDIVISION: In Freiburg, birthplace of the German anti-nuclear movement, new townhomes use solar power to produce more energy than they use. (Photo: Ashley Bristowe/Flickr)
 
Even before the full scale of the Japanese nuclear disaster at Fukushima was known, energy regulators and nuclear industry reps around the world scrambled to reassure the masses in their jurisdictions that there was nothing to fear from their nuclear plants. Within 72 hours of the tsunami wave’s catastrophic landfall at Fukushima, for example, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commision here in my home and native land put out this statement: “The CNSC would like to reassure Canadians that nuclear power plants located in Canada are among the most robust designs in the world and have redundant safety systems to prevent damage in the case of an earthquake.”
 
American nuclear officials issued similar pronouncements about the earthquake readiness (or lack of proximity to fault lines) of their reactors. So long as nuclear catastrophe arrives in exactly the same form it did in Fukushima, we are purportedly in good hands.
 
The notable, strident exception to this general rule of nothing-to-see-here dismissal was Germany, home to 17 nuclear power stations providing almost a quarter of the electricity for the world biggest export economy and a prosperous populace of more than 80 million. Watching the disaster unfold in Japan, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, a conservative and former proponent of nuclear power, reportedly told an aide, “Fukushima has forever changed the way we define risk in Germany.”  
 
The German government almost immediately ordered an emergency shutdown of its seven oldest nuclear plants, and within weeks Merkel announced a plan to eliminate nuclear energy from the German grid entirely by 2022. “We want to end the use of nuclear energy and reach the age of renewable energy as fast as possible,” she declared.  
 
In its response to Fukushima, Germany was a case study in the benefits of building resilience into a system. In Canada, in the U.S., even in Japan itself, policymakers had to defend the old system and its radioactive components, because their energy regimes were nowhere near ready to transition to anything else. But in Germany, after 10 years of innovative green-powered growth under the most ambitious renewable energy policy on the planet, there were legitimate alternatives close at hand. There was more than one option. And Germany has chosen to go with the one where growth is robust, costs are dropping and technology advancing rapidly — and where no natural phenomenon of any magnitude or unforeseen complexity could possibly lead to a disaster measured in thousands of years.
 
You wouldn’t have to look hard to find a well-placed scoff in response to this announcement. You’ll hear that the German government is already relying on imported French nuclear power to keep its grid operating, that it will have no choice but to replace the nuclear plants with climate-ravaging coal furnaces. You’ll hear that Germany is playing recklessly with the planet’s future for short-term political gain. (Merkel’s party suffered its first defeat in nearly 60 years to the staunchly anti-nuke Green Party in a critical state election just weeks after the Fukushima disaster began.)
 
You’ll hear, in essence, that Germany can’t do what it claims to be doing, which is to supplant the conventional energy system almost entirely with one powered by renewables and enabled by radical efficiency gains by midcentury or so. (Current German targets aim to have half its grid converted to renewable energy by 2030 and 80 percent of it green by 2050.)  
 
So yes: you’ll hear scoffing, skepticism, glib dismissal. You’ll hear remarkably little about the fine-grained facts of Germany’s cleantech industry, its energy legislation, its urban landscape and architecture and industrial design. Unless you’ve been paying close attention, you won’t hear the phrase most often evoked by the architect of Germany’s green economy — the late, great Hermann Scheer, possibly the only backbencher in parliamentary history to rewrite an industrial nation’s energy policy without ever wielding executive authority —when he described what he’d unleashed upon the German economy: The Second Industrial Revolution.
 
Since I first started tracking Germany’s green energy revolution circa 2004 — four years into the extraordinary run of its revolutionary feed-in tariff, which recalibrated the price of electricity to favor renewables over fossils and fissiles — I’ve been hearing scoffing. Skepticism. A great dismissive punditocratic pffffft from across the English Channel and across the pond. Get real. As if. Twelve percent renewable power by 2012? Gigawatt-scale solar production in cloud-covered Saxony? Oh, come on.
 
Well, 17 percent of Germany’s grid is now renewably powered, exceeding its target well ahead of schedule. Those solar-panel fabs are up and running. When Germany showcases its leading-edge design and future-tense engineering, it’s more likely to feature thin-film solar panels, hyper-efficient lighting and next-generation streetcars than German staples like sleek roadsters and durable appliances. The scale of offshore wind manufacturing at Germany’s North Sea ports resembles a Henry Ford take on the Colossus of Rhodes. Its urban redevelopments are smart growth, mixed-use showcases so flawless you’d be forgiven for thinking the East German Communists had been retrained to build green Potemkin villages.
 
Talk to German architects, product designers, even fashionistas, and the talk returns again and again to making the bold declaration — a sustainable, predominantly green-powered economy — everyday fact. Anyone who thinks the only answer to Germany’s energy future —and ours — lies either in new nukes or dirty old coal hasn’t been to Germany lately.  
 
I can say this with some certainty because, unlike many of the scoffers, I have been to Germany lately. I’ve only just returned from a whirlwind two-week tour. And I’ve come home with the same feeling as every other trip I've made to Germany in recent years: Awe. Quiet, wide-eyed awe. There is indeed a second industrial revolution underway. German is its mother tongue, but it translates easily. If you care at all about ending the age of fossil fuels and overcoming the existential challenge of climate change, you should be paying close attention to those translations.  
 
Over the next week in this space, I’ll tell you what I’ve seen most recently. Scoff if you’d like — but in the new green economy, as in the dirty old one, the smartest money remains on German engineering.
 
Also on MNN: 
  • Part 1: Germany: A cleantech case study for a post-Fukushima world
  • Part 2: Germany's massive bet on the offshore wind industry
  • Part 3: Hamburg schools the world in sustainable urban redevelopment
  • Part 4: Germany's creative class turns sustainability's limits into innovation engine
To keep track of innovation — Deutsch and otherwise — follow me on Twitter: @theturner.

 

Previous Post
Is the future of urban innovation in leisure or new industry?
   Next Post
Germany stakes its cleantech future on stiff sea breezes
You might also like:
Related Topics: Clean Tech, Energy, Energy Policy, Green Energy, Nuclear Energy

Comments

Follow this conversation
Add your comment
View:
  • All (32)

anonymous
David 07/12/2011 17:00 PM

Very interesting article indeed. Positive, uplifting, shows the power of people when they get to decide and the ratio of representatives to population is relatively high.
Sadly, that's not the case here in the states, where power is concentrated in all too few people, and the interest of these few representatives do not reflect that of the population.
None the less, I have hope that this root cause is unearthed, and policies that make sense for the population are enacted.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Eric 07/10/2011 22:20 PM

Pound for pound (literally), nothing produces cheap, plentiful energy like nuclear. And I don't mean traditional nuclear, but thorium reactors.

Thorium is clean, safe, plentiful, difficult and costly to make weapons-grade, and does not create a self-sustaining fissile reaction.

Uranium is what we use today because in the 1940s, the US was more interested in making bombs and not electricity. If I believed in a god, I'd almost say thorium was heaven sent.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Charles Chen 07/11/2011 09:12 AM

There are no operating, large scale Thorium reactors in the world. Thorium reactors are entirely theory to this point.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Jason Glugla 07/11/2011 08:54 AM

I guess that works if you don't throw in the costs of building, running and maintaining the plants along with keeping the waste. Nuclear power is the most expensive form of power there is.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Tom Bower 07/10/2011 14:14 PM

This should come as no surprise. Germany and Europe in general have always been energy conscious...they had to be. While we in the US have been drunk on cheap oil for decades, Germany has had to import nearly all her oil...gas prices at the pump in Europe were $6.00/Gal when we were paying $1.00.

We in the US are controlled by Big Oil and Big Corporate...we are free-market capitalism run amok. Most of Europe is benevolent socialism...a system that would benefit the US in many ways (except the.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Fourth Reich 07/10/2011 12:44 PM

East and west Germany are unified. Greece is soon to be south Gremany. Germany is a global power on the rise and is outpacing the USA by all economic metrics. Ignore at your peril.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
2bits 07/10/2011 10:15 AM

Germany is a lot smarter than the dummies in USA but the primary reason Germany will succeed is USA politicians have no balls--as US Corporations cut them all off and is juggling them in front of those same politicians threatening to move operations overseas if they don't get the tax breaks they want.

The difference is Germany's Corporations are patriotic--Americans are not.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Shofar 07/10/2011 09:49 AM

I've been reading the post and I honestly don't understand why the critics. The majority of writers are from US and it seems the article makes them jealous in how advance Germany is compared to America. The truth is the only comment somebody can say about this, is "Good for them" . Unless you are part of the Oil or Nuclear energy lobby, what do you care about the Green policies in Germany, that would let you criticize them online?
When I read: They can do that because they are not.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 07/11/2011 09:25 AM

Shofar,
Have you ever lived in Germany? I have for many years, and I found that the Germans are probably the most laziest people on the face of the earth. As for going green in Germany, they should start by burning less fuel on the Autobahn, reduce their speeds. But that is impossible for a German, since they feel and think that they are superior to everyone else in the world. Speeds on the autobahn are at the stupid stage, everyone has to be first there. Try standing in a line.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
FUNDED BY BIG GOVERNMENT IN THE FORM OF NEW TAXES 07/09/2011 19:22 PM

While I have no objection to Germany "going green", we have to understand that this is happening due to enormous new taxes on Germans. These new taxes will help to strangle their already difficult economy, which has been the motor of paying for failed socialist countries in the EU.

And Germany does not have to support a military to fight against Islam, like the US. This frees up money to "go green."

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
GK 07/09/2011 23:21 PM

You are partially correct. They do pay an insane amount of taxes (just under 50% including taxes for upper-middle class, 30-40% for most making less in addition to a 19% VAT). However, these taxes are hardly new.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Phillip 07/10/2011 23:13 PM

The high taxes you mention are commonly bandied about, but I have lived and owned property in Germany and the reality is somewhat different. When you note that the upper bracket is 50% you are correct, but it is more complicated than that, because that includes everything.

For instance, there are no taxes on homes (though real estate is taxed at a low rate), and there are no state taxes as well. Also, they have deductions the same as we do, so it's not like people actually pay the 50%.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Enter your name 07/09/2011 18:00 PM

The phrase "nuclear disaster at Fukushima" is repeated 4 times in the article. There was in fact no disaster there, despite an aging plant and a massive tidal wave! The potential for disaster was (and may still be) there, but this has not yet happened, so please keep this in the future tense. I've notice that when a jumbo jet crashes killing 300 people it is referred to as just an 'accident'. Anything wrong at a nuclear plant, even without fatalities, is termed a 'catastrophe', a 'disaster'..... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 07/10/2011 21:28 PM

Let's review, 100,000 plus homeless in Japan after the nuke stations fail, a clean up that will take a decade or longer and countless treasure and resources, a country with few natural resources and the loss of 20% of their energy source in one day which will hamper their growth for the fore-seeable future, the industrial business and jobs of their people at risk.

You're right, hardly qualifies as a disaster if you are a smug jerk sitting in the U.S. writing your absurd opinion in the.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 07/10/2011 01:06 AM

Yeah, given that organic German bean sprouts have killed more people (And infinite percent more in fact) than Fukushima is heavily ironic here.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Bill 07/09/2011 15:05 PM

Another left wing view!

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
WKE235 07/09/2011 11:01 AM

I can forsee two major natural disasters that would cause the collapse of civiliation if they are dependent on renewable energy sources. And those would be the eruption of a super volcano or a large asteroid impact. For super volcanos, we know these volcanos do exist and that do erupt on grand geologic scales. Yellowstone in the US is a super volcano caldera which last blew about 600,000 years ago (and 1.2 million years, and 1.8 million years ... almost like due to blow). And of course we.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Fred Magyar 07/09/2011 12:12 PM

True, but I don't see how either of those natural disasters would not affect global climate and agriculture, therefore causing massive die off due to starvation.

If you want to find better excuses not to try to move on to a post fossil and nuclear fueled world I'm sure you can ask the fossil fuel and nuclear energy lobbies to help you out.

I also hear they can be quite generous with funds for people who help them push their agendas.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Al 07/08/2011 20:36 PM

One word people... Thorium! I suggest you look it up and research it intensively.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
MoWalker 07/08/2011 15:54 PM

Nice place to live, and people adapt to cost of electricity being higher during the day, doing laundry at night, keeping light bulbs off except where a person is in the home, monitoring TV watching. No Big Deal.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
unicornfahts 07/08/2011 13:36 PM

What do they use for power when the wind stops blowing and it is night? Are they using storgage batteries? or some other form of polluting power source?
Or just sitting in the dark planning their next world war for resources?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 07/08/2011 15:49 PM

Maybe you should look up the basics of solar energy. The german population is just more willing to pay for things out of their pocket (like solar panels) and go out of their way to recycle, use puplic transportation, etc. Maybe americans should try to engage a little bit more on greener ways of living and things would work over here too. It just means that you have to get up of our *** and actually do something.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

The_Mick
The_Mick 07/08/2011 14:58 PM

Germany, despite poor natural resources, has not increased oil imports since the early 1980s.  At that time Reagan was tearing Carter's solar panels off the White House roof, telling us to go on an energy-burning binge that led to our cars getting ever less average mileage from the 80's to mid 00's,  Our imports of oil doubled and we've gone to cold and hot wars to protect our 25% usage of the world's oil.

 

Now, with that background, please explain why you think the.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 07/10/2011 23:26 PM

the USA should drill for our own natural resources, not be subsidizing Brazil to drill and refine their latest oil find with promises that we will be their #1 customer. What America needs is a truly committed constitutional candidate that will bring us back to looking out for the USA first and not worry so much about foreign opinions or foreign decisions to raise the cost of energy on their people. THERE IS NO MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING OR CLIMATE CHANGE. It was debunked over 2 years ago. .... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Paul Bradshaw 07/08/2011 16:55 PM

if you're going to make part of your plan doing things like pumping water into reservoirs when energy is cheap what do you do if off-peak energy prices go up?

and on the other hand, how do you deal with a surplus of energy if none of your neighbors will take it off your hands?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
SunnyGuy53 07/08/2011 12:31 PM

An Alice in Wonderland moment. Wouldn't it be slightly (cough) more accurate to say that the proponents of nuclear power are the ones who are "playing recklessly with the planet’s future for short-term political [and economic] gain"?

Ah yes. Always accuse ones opponent of ones own faults. It fools the superficial people, and that's a majority nowadays.

Kudos to the German government.

Sunny Guy

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Sanoran Triamesh 07/08/2011 12:19 PM

The Green Party and Greenpeace have succeeded in getting the 'girls' in Germany to think Nuclear is dangerous. It is not. Fukushima proved that.

Germany is relying on cheap oil from Iraq and Russia because the US is not competing for it. US is getting Canadian shale oil, which takes 1 barrel to make 6, so effectively canadian Oil has a much higher green-house gas level.

The result is that Germany is effectively increasing the green house gas emissions.

As for wind and.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Roy 07/08/2011 10:32 AM

17% is nice but that still means you're running on 83% non-renewables. Shuttering nuke plants isn't going to help greenhouse gas reduction, it's going to make it worse by using more coal and other dirty sources. If the leadership of Germany is squeamish about nuke power, they need to build NEW plants that have the latest safety features, not run from the tech altogether. It is an overwhelmingly safe technology, more so with the latest safety design. It will be YEARS before green tech can power.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
dave 07/05/2011 13:17 PM

Ironically, as it turns out, not Germany but France is in danger of facing energy shortages this summer (reported yesterday by the FAZ). The reason? France used to import up to 20 percent of their electricity supply from Germany during summers in past years - because the cooling facilities of their nuclear plants are ill-equipped to cope in periods of ardity and heat. With Germany's eight oldest plants offline, they won't be able to import electricity from Germany.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
j7t14r 07/07/2011 14:45 PM

The main reason France is having an energy shortage is they are allowing thousands of illegal aliens to crowd into the country and demand more resources than France, or any nation can provide. The North African population explosion is inundating Europe with all the low-wage labor any businessman could ever hope for, but the social consequence is overcrowding, religious fanaticism and a growing crime rate, which is what happens anywhere women do not have the right ot freely decide if and when.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 07/09/2011 08:38 AM

Right on

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
j7t14r 07/07/2011 14:48 PM

Looks like a good opportunity for Germany, France and all of Europe to convert to green energy sources for its electricity. That, plus 100% safe recycling of all garbage, sludge and junk, and peaceful family planning education, could make Europe the foremost leader of the peacefully emerging Green industrial revolution around the World.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

Add your comment

Sign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below.
    Log in or
    create an account
     
    •  
Used only for emailed comments and will not be displayed with your post
Notify me with an email when other people comment on this article.
The posting of advertisement, profanity or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our Terms of Use

EDITORS' PICKS

tease to bigfoot




tease to ketchup

tease to American Idol

ADVERTISEMENT

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered

CONNECT WITH MNN

Follow @twitterapi
 Tumblr
 Google +

About Chris Turner

Sustainability author covers the latest in green innovation.

RSS feedMore about Chris

Recent Posts

  • My big fat New Urbanism conference rundown, Part 2
  • My big fat New Urbanism conference rundown
  • The competitive advantage of green grids
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor

Long live the longleaf:

Partnership to restore the South’s majestic tree is expanded more >

Idea Power: Carbon Capture 101

Four Steps, One Solution more >

Idea Power

Biomass Comes to Nacogdoches County, Texas more >

Big step forward with solar power

The Cimarron Solar Facility in New Mexico represents a key milestone in the growth... more >

What Does Southern Company, a Community Land Trust and a Pentecostal Church Have in Common?

All three of us are helping protect a tiny, colorful fish on the endangered... more >
BETTER WAYS TO MAKE AND USE ELECTRICITY

ADVERTISEMENT



Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Advisory Board
  • Editors' Blog
  • Press
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Service
  • WorldShares

MNN Tools

  • Advice
  • Blogs
  • Day in History
  • Eco-glossary
  • Infographics
  • Lists
  • Photos
  • Videos

Connect

  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Contests
  • Idea Lab
  • Mixed Greens
  • Newsletters
  • Polls
  • RSS

Channels

  • Earth Matters
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Green Tech
  • Eco-Biz & Money
  • Your Home
  • Family
  • State Reports

Follow MNN

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Google+
  • StumbleUpon
 

Copyright © 2012 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE
 
SPONSORS