How a 13-hour train ride is better than a 1-hour flight
Photo: TreeHugger
link:
| « Previous China, U.S., and Europe race for the smart grid | Next » Is the environmental movement screwed? |
Comments(11)
Posted By Vic Nowoslawski - Fri, Feb 05 2010 at 10:40 AM ESTBagage Extra
Baggage cost should also be added, the airlines charge around $25 per bag one way.
This can add a significant amount to your travel. At least $50 to your round trip flight just for one bag.
So the total should be $170 if you packed two bags. You also have to remember that the fee goes up if you have more than one bag at ticket counter. There is a slight discount if you do this on the Internet.
Here is some additional information about various airlines and their bag.... More
Posted By Jimmy Dolittle - Wed, Feb 03 2010 at 9:51 PM ESTIts safer
I dont know about better, but I know is a lot SAFER.
Posted By jenwin - Wed, Feb 03 2010 at 12:52 PM ESTLove, love the train...
I completely agree. Whenever possible, I take the train for business -- its only a five-hour trip that leaves me relaxed and recharged. Folks on the train are much less stressed and impatient.. people are just simply more relaxed. My colleagues at work don't understand how I could choose this method of travel vs. flying... for me, there's no question what is better.. and try to plan most of my meetings in the afternoon to be able to take advantage of catching the train in the early morn. Plans.... More
Posted By Henrik - Tue, Feb 02 2010 at 4:05 PM ESTGreat
Trains are best!
you haven't mentioned that 1h flight is not really just one hour - but at least 4; and the cost to and from the airport adds up!
well, skipping airport/airplane hassle completely = priceless!
best!
Posted By Jaymi - Wed, Feb 03 2010 at 12:09 PM ESTYup - more than 1 hr
I briefly mentioned it in #4 - noting that it'd take about 1.5 hours on either side of the flight to get in/out and to/from the airport. It's taken me as long as 5 hours to get to/from airports...so much sitting around after getting through security!! LAME. The train on the other hand...I waited at most 15 minutes from arriving at the station to when we pulled away. So much better. :)
Posted By Chris Wiegman - Tue, Feb 02 2010 at 2:20 PM ESTIt's the best way to go
I live in Southern Illinois and have friends and family in Chicago. I could drive it or fly it, but we don't we always take the train. There isn't a single reason why I wouldn't want to take the train. The sad part is though that nearly everyone looks at me like I'm on something when I tell them how I'm going. Even my boss when I offered to train it for work thought I was nuts even after it saved them close to $400.
Posted By Jess @OpenlyBalanced - Tue, Feb 02 2010 at 2:07 PM ESTAnother Train Lover
I also love taking trains, but I particularly like your last bonus! Waving at trains is awesome :). High speed rail up and down the I-5 corridor can't come soon enough!
Posted By Eric - Tue, Feb 02 2010 at 1:57 PM EST40 hour train ride
I took the train from central Illinois to L.A. one time. It was one of the best trips I've ever taken - loved it. Made friends, listened to a TON of music, saw a huge variety of scenery across the entire country... It was awesome. I ended up taking the train for 40 hours, spending 40 hours in L.A., and taking the train 40 hours back, and it was totally worth it - despite everyone's immediate reaction of "well that sucks" when I told them about the travel time.
Posted By Kathy Heimbuch - Tue, Feb 02 2010 at 11:24 AM ESTSo true
I loved this article. I'm a family member who was at the event that Jaymi traveled 13 hours to attend and I saw that she was a happy, relaxed young woman. And yes, I was one of those that said "13 hours! Oh, my gosh!!". But seeing the pictures she sent of the beautiful scenery she passed on her trip made me wish I lived as far away and "had to" take the train to attend the same event she did.
Posted By Kim Woodbridge - Tue, Feb 02 2010 at 9:11 AM ESTLove the train!
I was really happy to read this article. When I go to visit family in Vermont I always take the train, which is a 8-9 hour ride. People think I should drive or fly. Driving takes just as long and my family doesn't live near the airport so the time spent flying and driving and dealing with security just isn't worth it.
And when the train isn't too crowded it's a fun trip - like you said you can walk around, read, nap, use the laptop, etc. And I usually travel with my kid who is 7.... More


Link

Stumble
Tweet











Hope for a resurgence in rail travel
Loved your article. Haven't taken any long-distance train rides lately, but do seek opportunities for historic steam engine rides at vacation destinations.
Took the Durango & Silverton narrow-gauge train a few years ago and it was the highlight of my "Four Corners" odyssey. Such great scenery and fun waving at people. With those trains on a fixed schedule, people would come out of their homes just to wave. That's the USA that I love!