Political pundit on the latest from Washington, D.C.
How would you feel if the spill wasn't BP's fault?
A new report says the cause of the spill was a design flaw that BP couldn't be responsible for.
Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:57 AM
A Wall Street Journal report
provides a possible scapegoat for BP in last year’s oil spill. Investigators say the blame for the disaster does not lie with BP but instead with a design flaw in the rig’s blowout preventer.
Essentially, the report says that the two giant shears that are supposed to deploy to overlap when a blowout occurs couldn’t shut because a bent drill pipe got in between the shears. The gap between the shears was 1.4 inches wide. Through that gap passed 4.9 billion gallons of oil that decimated the Gulf Coast. The report is extensive and is worth a look.
So now what? Is this the end of the finger-pointing? Is BP off the hook? It’s hard to say.
It’s been a long year. After the oil spill, we witnessed hearings and blundered responses from all sides. As more details surfaced about BP’s loose regulatory atmosphere, we also learned about the atmosphere of blunders at the Minerals Management Service, which at the time was tasked with looking after BP. The political response included the usual finger-pointing. One side offered apologies for holding the hearings
, while the other side made a failed last attempt to promote cap-and-trade
. All the while, there were restaurants, hotels and piers along the Gulf Coast that remained empty — not to mention drill rig workers who had to scramble while their industry remained in limbo.
The first question is: Do you believe that the spill wasn’t BP’s fault?
Then the next question should be: Does it matter?
The third question is the hardest: What now?
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.