New world record for renewable energy

Global investment in clean energy surged 17 percent to a record $257 billion last year, according to two new reports by the U.N. Environment Program.

Tue, Jun 12 2012 at 11:04 AM

Related Topics:

Geothermal power, Wind Power, UN, Economics

SUNNY OUTLOOK: Solar overtook wind as the fastest-growing type of renewable energy in 2011, the U.N. Environment Program revealed this week. (Photo: Oregon Department of Transpor

Renewable energy reached a big milestone in 2011, surging to a record $257 billion in global investments, the U.N. Environment Program announced Monday. That marks a 17 percent jump from 2010, and a six-fold increase over the past seven years. It also marks a breakthrough for the solar power industry, which drew nearly twice as much investment as wind energy last year, according to two new reports by UNEP and the Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21).

Total solar investments grew 52 percent to $147 billion in 2011, the reports reveal, ranging from an explosion of rooftop panels in Italy and Germany to big endowments for large-scale concentrated solar thermal projects in the U.S. and Spain. And while China has led the world in renewables investments for three years, it increasingly faces competition from all over the globe — especially from the United States.

Chinese renewables investments rose 17 percent to $52 billion in 2011, followed closely by America's 57 percent surge that pushed U.S. investments to $51 billion. The U.K., Spain and Italy also enjoyed investment booms, with respective growth rates of 59, 45 and 43 percent, although their totals remain relatively small. The most extreme change came in India, whose 62 percent rise to $12 billion represents "the fastest investment expansion of any large renewables market in the world," UNEP reports.

This is mostly good news for the renewables industry, particularly solar, but the UNEP and REN21 reports have some dark spots, too. While $257 billion is a new record for global investments in renewables, the 17 percent increase is down substantially from the 37 percent growth recorded in 2010. Some countries also saw their renewables investments decline, including Germany (-12 percent) and much of the Middle East and Africa (-18 percent). "Policy uncertainty created by the Arab Spring delayed some projects," UNEP notes, "but a number of important initiatives did still progress."

There were also economic setbacks, even in countries like the U.S. and U.K. that saw overall growth in their investments. Austerity measures and falling prices led some governments to cut subsidies and tax breaks for renewable energy, helping trigger a series of company failures and factory closures, including five major solar firms in the U.S. and Germany. One of the highest-profile of these collapses was California-based Solyndra, which had received $535 million in federal aid but still succumbed to price reductions courtesy of China's prolific solar-panel production.

But according to Udo Steffens, president of the Frankfurt School of Finance & Management and a collaborator on the two reports, such failures are merely the growing pains of a maturing industry. "Renewables are starting to have a very consequential impact on energy supply, but we're also witnessing many classic symptoms of rapid sectoral growth — big successes, painful bankruptcies, international trade disputes and more," Steffens says in a statement. "This is an important moment for strategic policymaking as winners in the new economy form and solidify."

There is also a precedent for this kind of halting progress, adds Michael Liebreich, CEO of Bloomberg New Energy Finance. "In 1903, the United States had over 500 car companies, most of which quickly fell by the wayside even as the automobile sector grew into an industrial juggernaut," he says. "[W]riting off the auto industry based on the failures of weaker firms would have been foolish. Today, the renewable energy sector is experiencing similar growing pains as the sector consolidates."

World leaders will be looking for ways to speed up this growth at next week's Rio+20 Earth Summit in Brazil, and UNEP executive director Achim Steiner says they should resist the temptation to curb assistance for the up-and-coming renewables sector too quickly. "It is essential to continue government policies that support and nurture the sector's growth, and to de-escalate damaging trade disputes," he says. "Otherwise, the low-carbon transition could weaken just at the point when exciting cost reductions are starting to transform the economics."

Here are a few more highlights from the UNEP and REN21 reports:

Renewable sources have grown to supply 16.7 percent of global energy consumption. Of that, the share from traditional biomass has declined slightly while the share from modern renewable technologies has risen.
Renewable power, excluding large hydroelectric, accounted for 44 percent of all new generating capacity added worldwide in 2011 (up from 34 percent in 2010).
Gross investment in fossil-fuel capacity in 2011 was $302 billion, compared to $237 billion for that in renewable energy capacity excluding large hydro.
In the power sector, renewables accounted for almost half of the estimated 208 gigawatts of electric capacity added globally during 2011.
At least 118 countries, more than half of which are developing countries, had renewable energy targets in place by early 2012, up from 96 one year before.

Also on MNN:

The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.

Previous Post
Watch: Giant wildfire burns in time-lapse

Next Post
Turtle 'marriage' ends after 115 years

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comment: 1

Andrew West Jun 12 2012 at 8:23 PM

It is amazing, even disturbing, that we continue to see these articles suggesting that wind and solar make sense OR have any significant part of our energy future. This is public relations at its worst. OF COURSE those getting enormous government subsidies want them to continue, but that misses the point. Math is required here. Have wind and solar made a measurable difference in our energy mix and have they helped to reduce C02 emissions? No. Not at all. It has been a huge disappointment and

.... More

waste of public funds. We are just beginning to learn that developers make money when the deal is done, not based on performance. This sounds a lot like sub-prime mortgages. I think we all need to start telling the truth - especially journalists. Solar and wind schemes have not reduced CO2 emissions and they have only raised electricity rates. "Energy farming" (wind and solar) will NEVER replace coal (or oil) and they are simply an over-priced supplements, not "alternatives." Incentives gave people false hopes about solving the problem and we are now beginning to learn the truth. Polls demonstrate that nearly 60% of Americans "believe solar will replace our dependence on oil," yet it is impossible. Despite significant subsidies in the last 5 years ($1 trillion worldwide) wind and solar are less than 2% of our total electricity generation (solar is .1%). Plus, because they are unreliable any attempt to accept their unpredictable electricity generation requires us to ramp down our base load electricity generation, creating additional costs and more CO2. This 2% addition of renewables hasn't changed CO2 emissions at all - even new demand has been 3X wind and solar. These schemes have made NO difference at all. Cheerleading for wind and solar might extend the incentives, but it won't solve the energy problem. We need clean, affordable electricity. My work is here: http://www.solutioneur.com