• Welcome
  • Community
  • Blogs
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Join
  • Log in
Follow MNN    
MNN - Mother Nature Network - Envrionmental News
improve your world

 

Friday, May 25, 2012
  • Earth Matters

    Browse All » Animals Weather Energy Politics Space Translating Uncle Sam Wilderness & Resources

  • Health

    Browse All » Allergies Fitness & Well-Being Healthy Spaces

  • Lifestyle

    Browse All » Arts & Culture Travel Natural Beauty & Fashion Recycling Responsible Living

  • GREEN TECH

    Browse All » Computers Gadgets & Electronics Research & Innovations Transportation

  • Eco-Biz & Money

    Browse All » Green Workplace Personal Finance Sustainable Business Practices

  • Food & Drink

    Browse All » Beverages Healthy Eating Recipes

  • Your Home

    Browse All » At Home Organic Farming & Gardening Remodeling & Design

  • family

    Browse All » Babies & Pregnancy Family Activities Pets Protection & Safety

Tweet
Pin It
Email Bookmark and ShareShare
WorldShares lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20 points now.
Learn More

Earn Points
What's this?
MNN.COM›

MNN BLOGGERS

Karl Burkart

Solar goes Hyper in the U.S.

HyperSolar magnifying film can increase solar panel efficiency by up to 300%, making solar competitive with fossil fuels.

Wed, Feb 09 2011 at 4:08 PM EST
 175

Solar Panel Magnifying Layer Image courtesy of HyperSolar
As the U.S. government continues to heap billions in subsidies to the world's wealthiest coal and oil companies, the solar industry has been struggling to make it in the United States. This is sad for many reasons, not the least of which is that we're missing out on one of the biggest growth industries in the world.
 
Currently there are 16 gigawatts of installed solar power globally. That number will grow to about 1,800 gigawatts in the next 20 years, making it one of the best job creators. U.S. engineers invented the solar panel, and the U.S. should be dominating that market. Instead, foreign manufacturers (particularly in China) have taken our IP and run with it, as we become increasingly dependent on foreign oil and dirty coal operations to meet our power needs. 
 
Fortunately HyperSolar, a new U.S. company, offers a ray of sunny hope on the clean energy frontier. 
 
The company does not manufacture solar panels. It makes them ultra-efficient using a field of science called photonics. Similar to a microchip that moves individual bits of data around at hyperspeed, HyperSolar's thin magnifying film routes and separates specific light spectrums, delivering them exactly where they're needed to make an array of PV solar cells ultra-efficient.
 
I saw an early prototype for such a magnifying optical layer a few years back, but the company was "dark" at the time, so I couldn't write about the innovation. But I'm as excited now as I was then for good reason — HyperSolar's optical layer can increase PV efficiency by up to 300 percent!
 
Theoretically that means cutting the installation cost of a solar array in half. Instead of a home solar system costing $30,000 (or more) it would only cost $15,000 (or less), making the upfront investment much lower and payback periods much quicker. 
 

 
This is a great example of a disruptive technology that could get us to the holy grail of "grid parity" — meaning that solar would be as affordable as other sources of energy like coal and natural gas. And no more polluting coal mines or fracking for natural gas! The sun (for at least the next 5 billion years) will provide free and abundant energy. It's up to us whether we want to invest in that technology or continue to destroy our beautiful landscapes for a few more years of "cheap" (i.e. heavily subsidized) coal. 
 
Innovations like this make several recent reports ring true. If we have the political will to overcome the stranglehold of the fossil fuel industry on our nation's energy policy, we could become 100 percent renewably powered in a 2030-2050 time frame. Check out these two reports and a new study by the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) about how large-scale wind power is now cost-competitive with natural gas:
  • Physorg.com: 100 percent renewables by 2030
  • WWF: 100 percent renewables (no nuclear) by 2050
  • AWEA: Wind cost-competitive with gas
So, what do you think? Can we kick the fossil fuel habit?
 
Also on MNN: 
  • Maxwell's demon converts information into energy
  • NYU professor removes camera from back of his head
Previous Post
Can gaming provide solutions to modern society's problems?
   Next Post
Wind power helping to keep the lights on in Japan
You might also like:
Related Topics: Energy Independence, Politics, Renewable Energy, Smart Grid, Solar Panels

Comments

Follow this conversation
Add your comment
View:
  • All (175)

anonymous
Liz Karschner 03/21/2012 09:16 AM

If this technology goes to market, more homeowners will be able to afford solar on their homes...me included. I just hope the solar efficiency keeps going up with the price going down to make it affordable for everyone.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Enter your name 09/04/2011 12:02 PM

Please stick to the facts and stop blatantly hawking an agenda so much. This article, like many of your recent contributions, is a blend of interesting and useful data mixed into a slurry of rhetoric-laced opinion and wild conjecture. You have a gift for technical writing, but this bad habit is reducing the value of your articles and your credibility as a writer. Given your level talent, I hope you overcome serious flaw before it drags you permanently down to the level of a mere hack.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ely 04/22/2011 12:54 PM

To quote that it has 300% better efficiency doesn't mean anything. 300% better than what? If you take the average solar panel efficiency (around 10%) that brings us up to 30% but who knows? This is just spin reporting.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ahmed 08/23/2011 11:31 AM

30% or even 10% efficiency is not bad at all. Just take into consideration that you get an output of 30 calories out of an input of FREE 100 calories. It's not like the case of a diesel generator, when you pay for fuel and the don't get the expected amount of electricity. These are great efforts that would bring hope for greener & safer future for coming generations.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Callum 04/18/2011 13:45 PM

Great news there! But just want to p*ss on your bonfire. The yanks didn't invent the solar panel sorry. It was a french guy called Antoine Cesar Becquerel

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Erv 04/23/2011 10:38 AM

The Frenchman developed the theory and the American invented the device that made it relevant.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
john doe 05/06/2011 21:27 PM

so you agree the french invented it and the americans used his invention? i suppose you also think americans invented the jet engine, the internal combustion engine and electricity because you also make them?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 08/21/2011 23:24 PM

Electricity was discovered it wasn't invented.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 07/05/2011 14:40 PM

Edmond Becquerel, a French scientist, discovered the photo-voltaic effect. He did not make solar panels nor did he even theorize how one could be produced.

William Grylls Adams, an English professor, and Richard Evans Day, also English, created the first crude solar cell. It did not create enough power to run any electrical devices they had but proved that a solar panel was possible.

The first solar panel that generated enough power to be usable was done in Bell Labs in the.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Huston 03/19/2011 18:26 PM

I see a lot of debate over weather or not this will heat up or cool down the earth... The laws of thermal dynamics state that the universe is always directed towards disorder. Things become more random, etc... We will never, no matter how efficient we become, get around this, we will always generate heat. Heck we waste more energy than we use just making it, let alone transporting it. It's a good thing that the Earth does vent off energy too; an amazing self equalizing mechanism she.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
jim sadler 05/04/2011 11:09 AM

When a solar panel absorbs energy it is absorbing energy that is bombarding the Earth anyway. That is far better than releasing stored energy by burning. Yes if it spins an electric motor or is used to power a PC the appliance will release some heat at the other end of the process. But it is energy that already would have struck the Earth anyway. Burning fuels to cook or stay warm is at the same level of a cave dweller. Solar is a real breakthrough.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 09/05/2011 16:49 PM

but barbequed ribs are sooo good.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Torbjörn Jilar , Professor in Energy Technology, Sweden 03/02/2011 05:23 AM

Dear Readers in the field of Solar Electricity,

This concept presented by Hyper Solar is for sure very Innovative and also completely relevant from the physical point of view ! I regard magnyfying solar irradiation in this way is a smart idea in order to bring costs for PV electicity down on more competitive levels. Now, what´s needed is a production scheme to realise this on an industrial scale and also a policy in the buiding sector which supports the installation and integration of.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Richard 02/05/2012 12:53 PM

Is it possible to create a spray on PV layer that can be applied to any surface?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
solar panels bundaberg 02/24/2011 22:04 PM

the article from wwf states that 100% renuable energy will be produced by 2050 ... there is still a long way to go ... who knows it can happen or it might not happen ??? and billons of dollors would be wasted ...

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Runswithbeer 02/21/2011 09:07 AM

Currently Wholesale prices for Solar panels in China are in freefall trading around $1 a watt. When they hit the magic 50 cents a watt price then solar power will become competitive with fossil fuels. I'm not replacing my power company with solar if it amounts to prepaying for 20 years worth of power upfront. I'll do it when the total cost of the equipment is under $5,000 installed for a 5kw/hour capacity system. We're not that far from that pricing point now. All I can say is GO CHINESE. The.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Jay 02/21/2011 06:11 AM

Again words like "theoretically" are used to explain the coming wonders of free energy that are always 20-50 years away. What happens until we reach that promised land is never really explained.

And, a claimed 300% increase in efficiency results in a 50% cost savings for a home installation? Must be using union labor...

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
nick 02/22/2011 08:52 AM

I think what the article didn't spell out was the fact that the hypercell layer is expected to be more expensive than a simple glass layer thereby increasing the cost of a solar panel while increasing its efficiency. This sounds like an excellent trade-off, as 'hypercell' panels should come down in price over time, and the effective cost savings could approach or exceed the 300% mark.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Timmy 02/21/2011 10:50 AM

Free energy? I must have missed that part... I didn't see anything about "free energy," I just saw a claim of increased efficiency in a fairly inefficient technology.

Maybe I'm just not clever enough to understand what I'm reading? (Well, maybe SOMEONE here isn't clever enough to understand what they are reading...)

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ahmed 08/23/2011 11:55 AM

in any power plant to produce electricity, whether operated by oil, coal, wind or water power - installations are a MUST to convert from one type of energy to another. These installations cost money anyway. When people say "FREE" energy when discussing solar or wind energy, they refer that the input for the system is FREE, unlike traditional fuels (coal, oil). you can't expect to get entirely free energy unless there's no conversion is needed - for example if you use wind energy to fly a.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Jeff 02/21/2011 10:48 AM

..it is possible the 300% increase in efficiency requires a more expensive manufacturing process. They didn't say "a 300% increase in efficiency with the same production costs."

But, hey, far easier to reflexively demonize unions than to engage your brain for a few moments and realize that unions have nothing to do with the story, right?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ahmed 08/23/2011 12:01 PM

it's obvious that production cost will increase somehow, otherwise, a 300% increase in efficiency would cut the cost to 1/3, and not to only 1/2 like stated.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
M.K. 02/20/2011 15:28 PM

As far as I know, we are still living in a free society, and if you do not approve of something you are not compelled to purchase it with the exception of car insurance. The right wing nuts love to critisize everything except letting churches and church related activities get away without paying their fair share of taxes, and letting idiots purchase deadly guns and ammunition. The same folks that argue against solar power are the ones that scream the loudest when the price of gasoline goes up. .... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ahmed 08/23/2011 12:14 PM

actually i don't understand how some people don't see that heading to solar & wind energy is a MUST! how many coming years they think we can depend on oil, coal, or even nuclear fuel?!

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ahmed 08/23/2011 12:09 PM

agree :)

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
jim sadler 05/04/2011 11:17 AM

Actually condo owners in Florida are required to insure the exterior of their buildings to protect the banks from losses. Then we are required to have another policy to cover the interior of our homes under the reasoning that following a storm or other event things like mildew can take over and effect an entire building if the unit owner is not insured sufficiently to fix the problems immediately. Even notions like a driver's license are expenses generated in order to protect the general public.
.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Kimberly 02/23/2011 22:59 PM

"and if you do not approve of something you are not compelled to purchase it with the exception of car insurance."

Yeah, and now health insurance and then....what next?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Herron Farms Dawsonville 04/23/2011 06:32 AM

And lets not forget Tax's

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Matt 02/22/2011 10:42 AM

But if the government were to tax religious organizations, that would be a violation of the much-touted-by-the-left separation of church and state. Are you ok with it in this case because it benefits you?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
jim sadler 05/04/2011 11:36 AM

Part of the reason that churches are tax exempt is that the money that they spend on the public good. Churches normally do worthwhile things. Tax money is also intended to do worthwhile things. Churches should not have a tax expense. The other factor is safety. If a church could be taxed the auditors would need a membership list in order to make certain that all contributions are reported. The Jews have a great deal of personal experience of what can happen when "lists" are available to a.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Rocky 02/21/2011 02:20 AM

The left wing nuts had control of congress for 4 years, 2 of them with a left wing president. I did not see them in a big hurry to change any of the items your were complaining about. Easy to see from your post you are anti-religion. That is your right in a free society. Unless you have your mind glued totaly shut, you would have to admit religion does bring some positives to society (I am not says all religions and not everything about even some religions). Unless you are one of those who.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Sandy K 02/20/2011 13:17 PM

I live in Southern New Mexico. Two-and-a-half years ago we put a 2.4 kw solar system on our rooftop. We are tied to the grid. We haven't paid a single electric bill since we installed the system. We get lots of sun and we sure need the air conditioning in the summer. I'm glad that research is coming up with more efficient ways to generate renewable electricity.

I want the US to not be dependent on other countries for our oil. I'd like to see electric cars. I know solar isn't for.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ahmed 08/23/2011 12:28 PM

glad to hear such a success story. you know, solar energy will be a MUST not only for the US and western countries. even here in Egypt, we currently pay a lot of attention and efforts to install wind and solar power plants - we have a lot of sun radiation here :). although we produce oil, but it's a plan for the future and coming generations. it's also the case in many African countries, which don't have fuel resources at all, and have difficulties securing their needs. wish you best of success..... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Idaho Tom 02/20/2011 13:46 PM

Hi Sandy, that's a bit difficult to believe. I am absolutely not saying that you're not telling the truth. It's just that with an AC running for a typical 3 bed-room home (just assuming), televisions on, cooking using oven pan, maybe your husband/wife working on the garage, someone took a shower and using the hair dryer, although everything happening all at once might not be that common, the typical electricity used can exceed 5kw for an average household. Do you get paid by the utility company.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Idaho Tom 02/20/2011 13:48 PM

Ooops, a correction, I mentioned 2.4 kW is not a lot of energy, it's actually a unit of power. So, that's not a lot of power.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
chuck snow 02/21/2011 14:56 PM

You forget that a grid connected system like her's feed excess power to the grid when it's not being used, then pulls more out of the grid (at night, when it's cloudy) when household use exceeds panel output. The sum total of power used in a year is less than the sum total of power produced by the panels. When she's brewing coffee and running that hair dryer in the morning, she's pulling from the grid. When she's at work and the lights are off, she's providing power to the grid.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
john doe 05/06/2011 21:32 PM

you forget that whilst a grid sounds great, during the peak load when everyone wants to be doing these things NO ONE is feeding power in because its NIGHT TIME. its marvelous that whilst she is at work she is feeding power in BUT all this does is keep the grid ticking over in low use period. the big generators kick in during peak load time and charge big dollars for their energy on the spot market. unless you build monster battery parks somewhere the whole notion of a grid system is just a.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Basilio 02/20/2011 11:01 AM

It is amazing how the subject and technology discussed here applies to a company trying to say that they have a new design and asking for people to buy their stock.
We have seen all that in the past. Snake oil salesman abound on the internet.
They even get professors, scientists in their boards to make it more real.
Can these guys get a life?
If they were really that innovative all they needed to do is to patent their design and go to any large producer and if what.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Oltan 02/20/2011 09:16 AM

It is just another concentrator. Maybe cheaper than others, big deal! Quoting a number like 300% improvement is nothing but marketing hype, simply dishonest.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Basilio 02/20/2011 10:31 AM

If you had any clues you would know that this is not a concentrator but actually a "SEPARATOR". There is big difference there. I am not telling you what it is because your brain does not have the capacity to know the difference.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Insight 02/21/2011 10:32 AM

"I am not telling you what it is because your brain does not have the capacity to know the difference."

What an astonishingly childish comment.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
matt 02/20/2011 22:28 PM

Enter your comments

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Oltan 02/20/2011 10:40 AM

Listen Basilio, I know more of these things than you'll ever able to dream. I did not go into detail. Separating, as you put is, the sun's spectrum maybe new to you, but it is standard in the field of high efficiency, e.i. expensive, solar technology. Repeat, this field extremely mature, there no magical breakthroughs left, just slow plodding.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Permafrost 02/20/2011 07:26 AM

Nature relies on sunshine falling on the ground to keep the Earth's temperatures stable. Absorbing the suns energy and converting it to electricity will result in vast areas under solar arrays becoming permafrost, leading the global cooling. The greater the efficiency of the solar cells, the faster the global cooling will occur.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

The_Mick
The_Mick 02/28/2011 18:41 PM

Under natural conditions, a significant proportion of sunlight (and sun energy) is reflected back into space. Solar panels are designed to trap as much of it as possible. Consequently, solar panels should contribute to a net warming of the Earth. My guess is this is much less a factor than the world's asphalt highways, but it's still a net gain of energy.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Bill 02/20/2011 23:32 PM

When a solar cell converts light to electricity the energy is not destroyed and it is not reflected back into space. virtually all of the energy will EVENTUALLY be converted to heat even if it is used in efficient devices. The operation of a solar powered air conditioner will generate heat through the operation of the electric motor, for instance (this is in addition to the home's/building's interior heat being carried outside).

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Had Thermo 02/20/2011 12:07 PM

By your logic there should be permafrost under every building. News flash: there isn't except in areas where there is permafrost already (because the sun doesn't heat the ground daily for large portions of the year). And since most solar panels are mounted on existing buildings, your assertion is doubly ridiculous. But even if it was true, the additional cooling could help the global warming...

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
NoFrost 02/20/2011 11:13 AM

Ba-hahaha!!!

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Loretta 02/20/2011 09:16 AM

I can't possibly imagine the Earth being covered with so many solar arrays that it would comprise enough shade that it results in permafrost. Also, increasing the efficiency of the solar cells does not change the amount of the sun's energy that falls on the ground vs the solar panels. It just that the solar panels are able to USE more of the energy that falls on them.

Tongue-in-cheek comment: Maybe a little bit of global cooling with counteract the supposed global warming??

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ben 02/20/2011 02:27 AM

I could be wrong on this, so bear with me... but I'm pretty sure my electricity is not generated by gasoline. So everyone keeps complaining about our dependence on foreign oil... so how is replacing coal/ nuclear power with solar-power going to reduce how much gasoline we use?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • >>
  • >|

Add your comment

Sign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below.
    Log in or
    create an account
     
    •  
Used only for emailed comments and will not be displayed with your post
Notify me with an email when other people comment on this article.
The posting of advertisement, profanity or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our Terms of Use

EDITORS' PICKS

tease to asteroids

tease to pet facials

tease to emotional eating

ADVERTISEMENT

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered

CONNECT WITH MNN

Follow @twitterapi
 Tumblr
 Google +

About Karl Burkart

Internet entrepreneur on green media and technology.

RSS feedMore about Karl

Recent Posts

  • Rock star charity seeks to Power the World
  • What do Leonardo DiCaprio, Linkin Park, Hayden Panettiere and Sergio Marone have in common?
  • Inhofe launches wacky 'Climate Hoax' book despite severe climate impacts in Oklahoma
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor

Long live the longleaf:

Partnership to restore the South’s majestic tree is expanded more >

Idea Power: Carbon Capture 101

Four Steps, One Solution more >

Idea Power

Biomass Comes to Nacogdoches County, Texas more >

Big step forward with solar power

The Cimarron Solar Facility in New Mexico represents a key milestone in the growth... more >

What Does Southern Company, a Community Land Trust and a Pentecostal Church Have in Common?

All three of us are helping protect a tiny, colorful fish on the endangered... more >
BETTER WAYS TO MAKE AND USE ELECTRICITY

Karl's BLOGROLL

EcoGeekFast Company
MongabayPhysorg Tech
Red Green and BlueTrendHunter Eco
TreehuggerGetting Hot in Here
Triple PunditWeb Ecoist

ADVERTISEMENT



Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Advisory Board
  • Editors' Blog
  • Press
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Service
  • WorldShares

MNN Tools

  • Advice
  • Blogs
  • Day in History
  • Eco-glossary
  • Infographics
  • Lists
  • Photos
  • Videos

Connect

  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Contests
  • Idea Lab
  • Mixed Greens
  • Newsletters
  • Polls
  • RSS

Channels

  • Earth Matters
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Green Tech
  • Eco-Biz & Money
  • Your Home
  • Family
  • State Reports

Follow MNN

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Google+
  • StumbleUpon
 

Copyright © 2012 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE
 
SPONSORS