Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Monday, May 20, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › MNN BLOGGERS
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
Solar goes Hyper in the U.S.
HyperSolar magnifying film can increase solar panel efficiency by up to 300%, making solar competitive with fossil fuels.
Wed, Feb 09 2011 at 3:08 PM
 178

Related Topics:

Energy Independence, Smart Grid
Solar Panel Magnifying Layer

Image courtesy of HyperSolar

As the U.S. government continues to heap billions in subsidies to the world's wealthiest coal and oil companies, the solar industry has been struggling to make it in the United States. This is sad for many reasons, not the least of which is that we're missing out on one of the biggest growth industries in the world.
 
Currently there are 16 gigawatts of installed solar power globally. That number will grow to about 1,800 gigawatts in the next 20 years, making it one of the best job creators. U.S. engineers invented the solar panel, and the U.S. should be dominating that market. Instead, foreign manufacturers (particularly in China) have taken our IP and run with it, as we become increasingly dependent on foreign oil and dirty coal operations to meet our power needs. 
 
Fortunately HyperSolar, a new U.S. company, offers a ray of sunny hope on the clean energy frontier. 
 
The company does not manufacture solar panels. It makes them ultra-efficient using a field of science called photonics. Similar to a microchip that moves individual bits of data around at hyperspeed, HyperSolar's thin magnifying film routes and separates specific light spectrums, delivering them exactly where they're needed to make an array of PV solar cells ultra-efficient.
 
I saw an early prototype for such a magnifying optical layer a few years back, but the company was "dark" at the time, so I couldn't write about the innovation. But I'm as excited now as I was then for good reason — HyperSolar's optical layer can increase PV efficiency by up to 300 percent!
 
Theoretically that means cutting the installation cost of a solar array in half. Instead of a home solar system costing $30,000 (or more) it would only cost $15,000 (or less), making the upfront investment much lower and payback periods much quicker. 
 

 
This is a great example of a disruptive technology that could get us to the holy grail of "grid parity" — meaning that solar would be as affordable as other sources of energy like coal and natural gas. And no more polluting coal mines or fracking for natural gas! The sun (for at least the next 5 billion years) will provide free and abundant energy. It's up to us whether we want to invest in that technology or continue to destroy our beautiful landscapes for a few more years of "cheap" (i.e. heavily subsidized) coal. 
 
Innovations like this make several recent reports ring true. If we have the political will to overcome the stranglehold of the fossil fuel industry on our nation's energy policy, we could become 100 percent renewably powered in a 2030-2050 time frame. Check out these two reports and a new study by the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) about how large-scale wind power is now cost-competitive with natural gas:
  • Physorg.com: 100 percent renewables by 2030
  • WWF: 100 percent renewables (no nuclear) by 2050
  • AWEA: Wind cost-competitive with gas
So, what do you think? Can we kick the fossil fuel habit?
 
Also on MNN: 
  • Maxwell's demon converts information into energy
  • NYU professor removes camera from back of his head

The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.

Previous Post
Can gaming provide solutions to modern society's problems?
Next Post
Wind power helping to keep the lights on in Japan

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 178
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
NoFrost Feb 20 2011 at 11:13 AM

Ba-hahaha!!!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Loretta Feb 20 2011 at 9:16 AM

I can't possibly imagine the Earth being covered with so many solar arrays that it would comprise enough shade that it results in permafrost. Also, increasing the efficiency of the solar cells does not change the amount of the sun's energy that falls on the ground vs the solar panels. It just that the solar panels are able to USE more of the energy that falls on them.

Tongue-in-cheek comment: Maybe a little bit of global cooling with counteract the supposed global warming??

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Ben Feb 20 2011 at 2:27 AM

I could be wrong on this, so bear with me... but I'm pretty sure my electricity is not generated by gasoline. So everyone keeps complaining about our dependence on foreign oil... so how is replacing coal/ nuclear power with solar-power going to reduce how much gasoline we use?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Leaf Feb 21 2011 at 10:34 AM

Electric cars?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
concerned Feb 21 2011 at 12:10 AM

If we use a permanent renewable clean source of energy in this country; we reduce our need for non-permanent dirty source of energy from some place else. We have the means to change over our cars, homes, and businesses. It's just be so profitable and inexpensive that no one who has been making a fortune on the old dangerous sources; that they don't want us to become independent and give up their profits. There's no reselling the sun or the wind.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Jon Feb 20 2011 at 7:58 AM
Pretty much every major car company in business right now is working on building electric cars for production within a few years. However, the electric grid isn't really equipped to handle an influx of electric cars, especially the possibility of significant portion of owners charging during on-peak usage hours. Having efficient and affordable solar power options will mean these people will be able to offset their on-peak grid usage, increasing the viability of electric cars for many people. Also,
.... More
if we have ultra-high efficiency solar panels on car roofs, that could significantly increase their range during daylight hours, also greatly increasing the viability of electric cars for a large number of consumers.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
wowlfie Feb 20 2011 at 2:05 AM

Show me a seller that makes a 200W panel at an affordable price for mainstream homeowners. Something like $1000 a panel would be affordable. Were a long way from that yet and maybe it will never happen.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Dave Michaels Feb 20 2011 at 7:08 PM

Under 1000.00.
Next

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Basilio Feb 20 2011 at 10:35 AM

get a life, Comment on ways to help not to put things down.
Solar cell panel prices will come down faster than the price for LCD TVs did, if and only there is an end to the bias to produce "cheap" continuous pollution producing energy.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Jon Feb 20 2011 at 8:03 AM

Because 200w panels are ~ $450.

http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS392US392&sourceid=chrome&ie...

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Jon Feb 20 2011 at 8:03 AM

Because 200w panels are ~ $450.

http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS392US392&sourceid=chrome&ie...

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
wowlfie Feb 20 2011 at 2:05 AM

Show me a seller that makes a 200W panel at an affordable price for mainstream homeowners. Something like $1000 a panel would be affordable. Were a long way from that yet and maybe it will never happen.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
George Bright Feb 20 2011 at 3:51 PM
I'm about to install a 6.4 kW system on my roof and I'm looking at paying $470 for 230 Watt panels. That's enough power to zero out my annual electrical usage and the payments on a ten year loan will be the same as my current electric bill. The system is immediately revenue neutral and after the loan is paid off years we won't have to worry about our monthly bill anymore. (And when we get the plug-in hybrid or full electric car in a couple of years, we'll just put in another 3.2 kW array to offset
.... More
that usage - sure beats paying for gas!)
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
SeguetoSolar Feb 20 2011 at 5:26 PM

George - don't forget to ask your solar certified electrician to give you a little solar energy you can use in case of an emergency. Some people have the whole house grid solar but can't use a bit when the power goes out! (How is that for ironic?)

Good luck - Segue to Solar

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
chuck snow Feb 21 2011 at 3:14 PM
The panels on your house aren't supposed to make you energy INDEPENDENT, they are meant to make you energy NEUTRAL. To be independent, you need a battery backup system. The cost and maintenance of such a system only makes it appropriate for houses too remote to be connected to the power grid. In most cases a small gas powered generator is far more convenient, and cheaper, than a battery bank The next gen electric cars might very well be able to "reverse power" your house. Instead of driving, you'll
.... More
be able to use their battery stores to power your home. Since the electric grid is one of the most reliable utilities you have, your comment makes me wonder where exactly you live. . If you have a mile long driveway with big trees towering over your power lines, then the problem is yours. I live in a forested, mountainous region of New York State, and have lost power less than 24 hours in three years. All things considered, it's pretty damn good.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Farrel @ Apex Solar Feb 20 2011 at 2:10 PM

The cost of solar is much lower than before. We sell 200 Watt solar panels for $450-500 per panel. Much lower than the guy that said $1000 per panel would be good.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Ben Feb 19 2011 at 11:35 PM

Those are all well known technologies. This is not the only company doing this kind of thing, nor did they discover any of it. The problem with all of that stuff is the cost. Solar isn't about power efficiency, it's about cost efficiency.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Pablo Feb 19 2011 at 6:21 PM

Got a nice lil uranium based heater pumping out 1.21 Giga watts in my back yard. Managed to keep the whole neighborhood powered when their power went out this past snow storm. Seems there is a better way than making toxic solar panels that actually use more energy and create more toxic waste than a coal fired plant.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Had Thermo Feb 20 2011 at 12:15 PM
The energy cost to make a crystalline solar panel (the most expensive) is paid back around 3 years of normal use. With a lifetime of 30+ years, a panel generates energy for 27+ years (barring accidental destruction) with minimal additional cost. Unlike a smokestack off a coal plant spewing small particulates, or a nuke plant generating radioactive waste, a solar panel is a relatively small and discrete thing that can be easily and safely disposed of. No extreme measures are needed, and most of
.... More
the components are actually recyclable by man: frames, glass, etc.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
PrivateTwo Feb 20 2011 at 9:55 AM

Well, your comment is fine, with one big flaw. If you have this in your back yard, and you have now posted it online, how long do you think it will take before you are shut down ?????

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
ilnj Feb 20 2011 at 9:10 AM

You have purified uranium in your back yard? I assume it is a cold fusion reactor? Bravo to you Sir! Please continue to hide your genius behind a mask of insanity!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
James Feb 19 2011 at 6:15 PM

yadda yadda yadda. Every couple of years we get these type of stories about solar energy and they are always a scam or simply not true. Have yet to determine which category this story falls into.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Luke Feb 19 2011 at 11:44 PM

Yeah, and this whole idea that someone could invent a bulb that puts out light when you apply electricity to it is either a scam or simply untrue too. No WAY that technology will ever be viable for the average American home... oh... wait...

Your spectacular lack of foresight doesn't mean that solar technology won't become viable, it just means that you will be a sheepish late adopter at best.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
SolarScam Feb 19 2011 at 3:06 PM

Many are phoney contractors check with the Better Business. Investigate, many people have benn ripped off in NJ. They use a pyramid scheme whereby they install a few panels then wait for another sucker to buy in. I had one hell of a job getting my money back and never sign a contract that is not valid in NJ or in your state.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Welnur Feb 19 2011 at 10:30 PM

It's been well-documented that the BBB is a scam. They require money for ratings and do little to no research on the companies. No payment, F rating.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • next ›
  • last »

EDITORS' PICKS

tease kids in woods

line

tease stargazing

line

tease hand

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  2. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  3. 10 false facts most people think are true
  4. Indian man single-handedly plants a 1,360-acre forest
  5. 20 ways to reuse coffee grounds, tea leaves
  6. The 9 nastiest things in your supermarket
  7. 12 best new features of the Samsung Galaxy S4
  8. Stone Age people may have battled against a zombie apocalypse
  9. Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
  10. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor
Energy University: How Power Works
We are surrounded by electricity, or "electron-jumping," every day. more...
Southern Company: Better ways to make and use electricity
DC to NYC in a Tesla Model S
Two couples set off for an emissions-free weekend trip to New York City in the all-electric Tesla more...
Southern Company: Better ways to make and use electricity
Protecting a Unique Natural Habitat
The Crosby Arboretum in southeast Mississippi is helping educate the public about the natural more...
Southern Company: Better ways to make and use electricity
Exceptional Anglers
Special needs kids in Alabama get an opportunity to do what many take for granted -- enjoying the more...
Southern Company: Better ways to make and use electricity
An Unlikely Home
High-line electric transmission towers are home sweet home for the threatened bird species more...
Southern Company: Better ways to make and use electricity

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS