Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Tuesday, May 21, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Earth Matters › Energy
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
First hydrogen fuel cell for the home
First commercial hydrogen fuel cell for the home has gone into its final testing phase and will be available in Japan the spring 2009.

By

PlentyMag.com
Mon, Mar 30 2009 at 4:52 PM
 20

Related Topics:

Hydrogen Fuel

 
 
Japanese electronics company Matsushita, best known for its Panasonic line of home electronics and appliances, will claim first place in the race to put commercial home fuel cells on the market, but a slew of other companies are in tow.
 
The fuel cell can optimally provide 70 percent of the energy needs for a 1,280 square foot house with four people. According to Matsushita, the cell can reduce energy consumption by 22 percent and CO2 emissions by 12 percent as compared to all other power sources. The unit is guaranteed to last 40,000 hours, which amounts to ten years of operation, roughly the same amount of time it will take a consumer in Japan to recoup their initial investment. (The government will subsidize the purchase, although how much remains undetermined. The company estimates a $10,000 investment by consumers.)
 
Customers will purchase the fuel cell system from a local gas company, who will install it, a fairly simple process says Matsushita.
 
While fuel cell technology takes many different forms, in this case, the cogeneration home fuel cell hooks up to the city’s natural gas lines, extracting hydrogen from the gas in a fuel-processing device. The stream of hydrogen is combined with oxygen through a series of polyelectrolyte membranes, a process that creates electricity, heat, and water. The home fuel cell produces between 500 watts and a 1 kilowatt of electricity and captures the heat to warm a tank of water, used for showers, dishes etc.
 
The company views the product as a contribution to Japan’s goals of reducing global CO2 emissions 50 percent by 2050.
 
Matsushita was evasive, however, about the amount of energy required to manufacture its fuel cell. In general fuel cells require a great deal of energy; for example, this unit contains more than 2,000 components. Whether the production of the units negates the energy and CO2 savings gained by customers is unclear.
 
Could the home fuel cell work in the US today? It could. With a few tweaks to the voltage and filters that deal with impurities in the natural gas, technically speaking, the fuel cell would work. Will it be here soon? They say there are no specific plans, but Matsushita hopes to make the home fuel cell available in the EU, Africa, China, and the Americas sooner than later.
 
Story by Victoria Schlesinger. This article originally appeared in "Plenty" in July 2008.
 
Copyright Environ Press 2008

 

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 20
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
MIke Meyer Mar 06 2013 at 1:01 AM

Nedstack in Holland has a wonderful product line and has a 1 giga watt Fuel cell in use and market units down to 2.2KW to 9.5Kw which could power a Home.... they currently use them to run remote cell towers...... Making there unit work in a house is not that big of a problem. you use a Gas Reformer to make Hydrogen from Natural gas you don't Burn anything your byproduct is Water and some Heat these units are PEM type cells.. small nedstack.com

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Eric in Indiana Jan 01 2013 at 6:43 PM

little late to this post. but it would seem from a common sense stand point that based on the whole humans cause global warming arguement I must say houston we have a problem, as the Ice age ended when there were hardly iany humans and no machines. there for it would only stand to reason that to correct this horrible travisty that we should all stop breathing to show solidarity for the this pressing issue.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Bill Nov 15 2012 at 9:52 AM

The real advantage of these independant home systems is that terrorists cannot sabotage them like the main grid.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
chinaman1013 Dec 25 2011 at 8:27 PM
the CO2 being produced is mentioned merely to inform us it has not been reduced entirely. present energy production produces much more CO2 and countless other toxins released each day into the atmosphere. The ideas outlined in other posts are brilliant in theory collecting and harvesting the good from the CO2 emmissions. The shortfalls of government and energy companies will always continue to hinder progress in technology due to their greed produced by the consumers reliance on them. Unless these
.... More
technologies can be mostly privately funded and placed into mainstream, the energy companies will continue their stranglehold. They are effectively compared to the heroin dealer on the street corner. they know they got you hooked you will be back for more on a regular basis until you find an alternative fuel cells can be that methadone. Imagine driving an electric car that reproduces all needed electricity through small air resistance turbines and friction generators running on the insides of each rim
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
daniel Feb 28 2011 at 12:55 AM

they need to redo their math... 40,000 hours is not even half of their 10 year claim! It's about 4.6 years!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Sharktooth Nov 18 2010 at 11:50 AM
Modern Steam turbine generating power plants convert coal into energy at an efficiency of 35-39% efficiency. Fuel cells, 60-70%Why not setup banks of fuel cells in neighborhoods? Sell the electricity, sell the waste heat to consumers. This could really make a dent in out energy use. Possible to cut the energy use by 1/2. Fund the entire enterprise by using the money saved in energy. Local power generation saves on infrastructure maintainance of the big high tension lines, also saves on the
.... More
losses of transmitting power. Instead of spending additional money on energy, we could spend it on hiring people to design, build, and maintain the fuel cells. Would be a great job creator. Cut CO2 emissions. Cut the amount of coal needed for power generation.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
bullmoose50 Nov 12 2010 at 1:27 PM

Here is my solution...get the fuel cell that converts water into power and CO2...THEN pipe the CO2 into a greenhouse! Fuel AND food at the same time!

(Not that I believe the greenhouse-gas garbage being spouted by the libs; but hey, why not make it work on both ends??? )

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
ram Feb 12 2011 at 9:09 PM

whether you cover the plants(in case of a greenhouse) o0r no cover, net CO2 reduction is the same. think about it.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Bud Jan 30 2010 at 9:20 PM
There are some real Haters on this site. Be positive and use your brains. This concept is brilliant. Hot water and electricity for every home without relying on local companies to continue increasing energy costs. The trick is to convert water into hydrogen, hydrogen into electricity and heat, then back to water. If you convert HHO into Co2 then you create more green house gases, and yes that is verifiably bad for the polar bears and life as we know it. If you don't believe then you might as well
.... More
get a coal furnace and leave the rest of us alone. Where can I get one of these? Sounds a lot better then solar panels.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
matt Dec 08 2009 at 12:44 PM

joe you're an idiot

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Not eco-freak. ... Nov 21 2009 at 12:26 PM
The problem with CO2 emmisions is not good. But it is not what I want to focus on all the time. Yes, this is useful. It can lower costs, it can heat things while making power at the same time, and it's better for the environment. But that is where it should be in my list, last. The thing is, it's still important. Trees need CO2 to live, but there are getting to be too few trees to soak up enough to be safe. Yeah, we should cut back on CO2 emmisions but what's more important is to get the trees to
.... More
breath it and release the oxygen back into the envirnment that we need. It was a cycle that animals would make CO2 and then plants would use it and make O2 and we would use that, make CO2 and back again. Humans screwed it up and we'll have to wait millions of years to see if it can be fixed.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Tired of the Fa... Dec 09 2009 at 2:15 PM
CO2 is bad? Oh come on! Plants need CO2! Most living creatures on this planet exhale CO2! Ummm, and thus CO2 is bad for our health? And CO2 causes global warming?! OMG! Are people out there really that nieve? So, if what we are experiencing now is global warming, then what caused the glaciers and ice caps that once completely covered North America to melt? Hello?! Is there anyone left out there with any common sense at all? This whole global warming nonsense is just that nonsense...created
.... More
in the minds of some trillionaires who want to rape the nieve public of more of their capital...wake up and realize the lie! Semper Fi MAC!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
daniel Feb 28 2011 at 12:58 AM

Dear "Tired of False Hope", are you dumb or just ignorant? Yes, excess CO2 causes global warming... go back to science 101!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Aug 12 2012 at 1:35 PM

No your the idot science 101 shows that global warming is a complete lie.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
daniel Feb 28 2011 at 12:58 AM

Dear "Tired of False Hope", are you dumb or just ignorant? Yes, excess CO2 causes global warming... go back to science 101!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
erv Jun 25 2010 at 4:25 PM
Half of your statement is true. There are natural processes that make and use CO2. The problem is that we're making too much at one time for the processes to handle the added CO2. Therefore the extra CO2 accumulates and creates this warming affect that is called Global Warming. We're piling more CO2 on top of what already ended the Ice Age. That natural level keeps the Ice Ages at bay. Duh! The difference between ignorance and stupidity is education. If you don't know facts you're ignorant. If you
.... More
know that facts and ignore them, you're stupid.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
robm Oct 27 2010 at 6:52 PM

If we are really having global warming as all the experts say . Why is it that Greenland is Frozen over when in the year 1100 is was Green? You know when the Vikings discovered it and named it "Greenland".... And if plants live off of Co2 in theory they should be growing faster and more luxuriant than ever before .

Just a couple of thoughts
...

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
meatbal Apr 03 2011 at 9:15 AM

The reason that Greenland has its name is that the Vikings wanted people to stay away from iceland. They named the green one Iceland and the icy one greenland. Nice to know a simple mind trick works 900 years later ( at least on some people).

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Joe Oct 19 2009 at 3:37 PM
This is a device I want because of usefulness, not this CO2 propaganda crap. Why can't companies sell their products on how good it will be for the consumer directly and stop shoving this propaganda down our throats? Cut my electricity bill? Cut my dependence on local municipal utility districts? Give me electricity when the power goes out? Give me electricity 24/7 in the dark, day light, calm or storming day? Heat my water and or my home at no extra expense? No pollution that can directly effect
.... More
or harm my family or residence? SIGN ME UP "Cut CO2 'emissions?'" CO2 is not a pollution, just ask a tree, it would die without it.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Demetrius Jan 20 2010 at 12:23 AM

YO JOE!!!!!!!!!!!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Log in or register to post comments

EDITORS' PICKS

tease painting

line

tease devil's kettle

line

tease calories

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  2. What causes tornadoes?
  3. 10 false facts most people think are true
  4. Best air-filtering houseplants, according to NASA
  5. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  6. 20 ways to reuse coffee grounds, tea leaves
  7. Do e-cigarettes help smokers quit?
  8. 5 mind-bending facts about dreams
  9. The 9 nastiest things in your supermarket
  10. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor
Energy University: How Power Works
We are surrounded by electricity, or "electron-jumping," every day. more...
Southern Company: Better ways to make and use electricity
DC to NYC in a Tesla Model S
Two couples set off for an emissions-free weekend trip to New York City in the all-electric Tesla more...
Southern Company: Better ways to make and use electricity
Protecting a Unique Natural Habitat
The Crosby Arboretum in southeast Mississippi is helping educate the public about the natural more...
Southern Company: Better ways to make and use electricity
Exceptional Anglers
Special needs kids in Alabama get an opportunity to do what many take for granted -- enjoying the more...
Southern Company: Better ways to make and use electricity
An Unlikely Home
High-line electric transmission towers are home sweet home for the threatened bird species more...
Southern Company: Better ways to make and use electricity

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS