Nuclear energy: Good or bad?
A primer to atomic power's hottest topics.
link:
Comments
ya ***** im balin
this is help
i think nuclear energy is very reliable as it uses very little uranuim to create lots of energy and it causes very little pollution
hi
Hey I love helping the enviroment every day after school i go around the neighborhood and find trash and i pick it up. I also clean up griffiade.
This is so fun Thank you for every thing (P.S> I HAVE DIABETIES AND I'M SPEACHEL ED)
ah i realy feel bad for you. BUT GOOD JOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
good
Nuclear energy is better option we know that nuclear energy have some disadvantages like dispose off the waste, 1000 MW plant required 4,70,000 gallon of water for cooling purpose and warm water contain some radiation but every thing consist some merits and demerits and if we talk about the merits of nuclear energy 1 gm of uranium gives the same amount of energy of 4.5 ton of coal. Uranium does not consist any greenhouse gases like CO2 (which is the main cause of global warming), NO2 or S.... More
trying to do work >:D
In terms of power and natural resources, off-shore drilling in North America offers a better alternative than to increased nuclear power plants. Not only do we move away from oil dependency, but we will also have a decline in unemployment rates in the United States. To many, especially businessmen, some environmentalists, and politicians, more nuclear power means more Watts, when in reality if a reactor actually does meltdown due to natural causes or human error, the radiation released will.... More
there will always be human error in everything but we can get more out of the nuclear power one nuclear power plant can produce power for 19 percent of the united states of america
Im in ms. murphays class
whats it say?
some of these comments that i read are realllllly ignorant and im 13 some of u gus just need to think before you put dumb comments up
This situation is good. Everyone says that nuclear is bad becuase of the radiation. That should not even be in the conversation because the rad iation that is created is less than that created by the coal plants. its also cheaper and that pisses me off when people say that the government is not helping the econemy and yet they don't want the cheaper way of creating electricity.
This situation is good. Everyone says that nuclear is bad becuase of the radiation. That should not even be in the conversation because the rad iation that is created is less than that created by the coal plants. its also cheaper and that pisses me off when people say that the government is not helping the econemy and yet they don't want the cheaper way of creating electricity.
I D G A F(:♥
This is so dum you all are right it willl kill and save you life so get over it does kill it does cost money lots of money.
I am doing a speech on nuclear technology and i have found may facts about nuclear technolgy that will make you wet your pants.
I am doing a speech on nuclear technology and i have found may facts about nuclear technolgy that will make you wet your pants.
nuclear energy is both bad and good. look into it, kids.(:
WE WILL ALL DIE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, SO WHY NOT ENJOY LIFE AND THINK AGAIN ABOUT HATING NUCLEAR ENERGY!!!
its true we all die one day but what about our generation and childern?live and die but at least save the world for future,its good some times think about others! think before u write some thing.
me and my freinds are working togather to do a report and we read this and we showed all our freinds the comment who cares and we arethought it was funny and had a little bit of a point but it made us all laugh
well the arguments for both sides are all well and good but im going to side with wind and solar for now due to the long term effects the radioactive material poses on the environment.
Renewable energy is the way to go! How long is the resources for nuclear energy going to last? 100 to 200 years maybe. Thats not a long time. Solar and wind energy will always be there.
GO Renewable energy
Solar and wind energy are expensive and unreliable. What if we live somehwere where the sun's never out? Uranium is abundent and very easy to mine, and it will continue formin through the rock cycle.
Nuclear Energy is bad we could all get killed from it from 1 mistake
You sir/mam are retarded and should do your homework
actually, coal power plants produce more radiation than nuclear power plants. alomst all of the nuclear power plants are well handled and theres little to no danger. also, nuclear energy does not produce any greenhouse gases, so it doesn't pollute at all! although nuclear waste is a problem, we can recycle it, eliminating nuclear waste!
Nuclear energy is a very reliable source of energy. When was the last time the nuclear power stopped working? I can't remeber either. Nuclear power is often related with weapons and nuclear power plants were thought to explode like a nuclear bomb. But physics prove that nuclear power plants can't explode like a nuclear bomb. It is said that radiation leaks can cause cancer, and other diseases, but nuclear medicine can lead to the treatment of cancer and other diseases. It only takes a small.... More
Nuclear energy is horrible because we haave to store it and then it can leak out and get into our ground water and then we are drinking radio active material. Wind solar and other foarms are way better. Also nuclear cost so much money and is so dangerous.
First off nuclear energy is stored as electricity and pressure so its not going to leak and what we would do is store the waste so far underground that it will not be any harm to us and its going to eventualy leak into the core of the earth and be incinerated instantly or we will recycle it and it becomes easyer and easyer to build them on a budget, also a coal plant gives off 3 times as much radiation as a nuclear power plant and on top of that it gives off carbon monoxide witch is relieced.... More
Nuclear energy is MUCH cheaper than wind and solar, espicially in the long term. Also, Nuclear power plants last for a very long time. We can reuse nuclear waste so that it won't leak into the ground water, although the U.S. does not allow that yet...
actually, nuclear energy is not that expensive to create
That is the worst argument I have ever heard..
Emissions: on a per electric energy unit basis nuclear power releases the lowest amount of greenhouse gases (EVEN LESS THAN SOLAR AND WIND POWER)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmenvaud/584/...
Cost: Although the cost of nuclear power plants is
I suppose nuclear energy will be one of those never ending disputes from both sides. The positives of nuclear energy in its ability to produce clean energy versus the negatives of reprocessing and long-term storage.
Not being anything near a nuclear expert, couldn't the reactors be constructed sub-surface to reduce any risks with a malfunctions? There are reasons I can think of that may not make that proposal realistic although I've never seen any information to reflect the potential either.... More
