Despite scientific evidence, Upton presses on
The decisions of Fred Upton, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, don't have to make sense. The man has the power to make big decisions.
Fri, Mar 04 2011 at 7:05 AM
DENY IT: Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) is on a historic march against science, and he may win. (Photo: Max Whittaker/Getty Images)
These days, Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) uses most of his time generating new ways to handcuff efforts to keep our air clean, our water safe and our science sound. What is noteworthy — besides the absurdity — is that Upton continues his quest even as study after study confirms how these protections are saving lives. But let’s not forget that science denial is Upton’s obsession.
The latest report comes from Upton’s arch-enemy, the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA's new study estimates
that reducing fine particles and ground level ozone pollution as outlined in the 1990 Clean Air Act would save, “$2 trillion in 2020 while saving 230,000 people from early death in that year alone.” The report appears to be thorough as it “received extensive review and input from the Council on Clean Air Compliance Analysis, an independent panel of distinguished economists, scientists and public health experts established by Congress in 1991,” according to a story in
The Michigan Messenger.
According to this recent study, Upton’s decisions as chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee could cost lives while putting the country deeper in debt. These are interesting positions for a pro-life fiscal hawk from Michigan. But let’s not start thinking that things have to make sense in Washington.
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.