Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Saturday, May 25, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › MNN BLOGGERS
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
Green vs Greener: It's catching on
The language of environmentalism is important-- what's the difference between "green" and "greener"?
Thu, Jul 23 2009 at 1:04 PM

Photo credit: Flickr user Flipped Out

Great minds think alike.
 
Or at least greener minds do.
 
I was really excited to read a post by Treehugger's Collin Dunn over at Planet Green (which is owned by the Discovery Channel which also owns Treehugger) that talked about the difference between "green" and "greener". I wrote about the same topic a few weeks ago and it's very cool to see the idea popping up independently around the green blogosphere.
 
It's a hugely important concept. Green means doing something that has zero negative impact on the environment. Greener means it's better than how it's conventionally done. Green is a fixed target, greener, by definition, is a moving one, always behind pushed down the horizon as we approach the eco-nirvana of green.
 
Collin came up with some great examples of the difference between green and greener.
 
• Recycling is greener; cradle-to-cradle, zero-waste design is green.
• Hybrid cars are greener; bicycling is green.
• Grass-fed beef is greener; not eating meat is green.
 
I would add a slight qualifier to the bike being green- bikes won't truly be 100% green until the infrastructure supporting the design, manufacturing, distribution, marketing, and end of life care is all renewable, and sustainable.
 
None of us are green until we're all green.
 
Collin wraps his post up well:
 
What does all this mean? First of all, green is the goal, the thing that we're working toward each day. This isn't meant to be a diatribe against these "greener" steps, or an indictment of those who are doing them. Greener is good; what isn't so good is when we get lulled into thinking that they're enough. That brings me to the next takeaway: Green is hard, and that's okay. We're facing big problems, and we need big changes to create the fast solutions that we need to solve the climate crisis. Consider this greener vs. green meme an aspiration, not a condemnation. We all want to improve our general well-being, so keep green in mind as something to aim for, rather than settling for green enough for now. It's a moving target, so don't get confused by all the different messages, and use the target to keep you moving toward green.
 
Swing over and read the entire post and leave your thoughts in comments here. My original post is here.
 
Are you on Twitter? Follow me (@sheagunther) there, I give good tweets.
 
And if you really like my writing, you can join my Facebook page.
 

 

The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.

Previous Post
Eco fail: Subway car reef project disintegrates
Next Post
Watch: The World According To Monsanto

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:

EDITORS' PICKS

tease weird things

line

tease cellars

line

tease fishing

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. Student science experiment finds plants won't grow near Wi-Fi router
  2. How to get a second crop of tomatoes -- for free
  3. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  4. 10 cats made famous by YouTube
  5. Man looks for missing cat, finds 'UFO' instead
  6. Food fraud: 10 counterfeit products we commonly consume
  7. 10 false facts most people think are true
  8. Men and women literally see the world differently
  9. 15 houseplants to improve indoor air quality
  10. Bras don't actually work, says French study
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS