SPECIAL FEATURES:
Scott Brown takes heat for vote on clean air bill
League of Women Voters criticizes the Massachusetts senator for supporting attempts to decrease carbon and pollution standards.
Wed, May 04 2011 at 1:30 PM
TEAM OF RIVALS: Republican Sen. Scott Brown (right) may be more popular with Massachusetts voters than Gov. Deval Patrick (left), but he's taking heat for a controversial vote. (Photo: Office of Governor Patrick/Flickr)
Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) has become the target of a pro-environment advertising campaign because of a recent anti-environment vote.
In April, the junior senator from Massachusetts threw his support behind Amendment 183 of Senate Bill 483, which would have eliminated clean air standards aimed at reducing smoke stack and tail type emissions. Brown was unsuccessful in his vote — but he did give opponents some ammunition.
The League of Women Voters took out a banner ad on the website of Brown’s hometown newspaper, Boston.com, which asks why Brown supports the reduction of standards that protect the air that children breathe. The ad also includes a poignant video that puts Brown in a difficult position.
The video, which is posted below, lives on the site PeopleNotPolluters.com. “Here in Massachusetts, clean air standards prevent thousands of hospital visits, serious asthma-related illnesses, and even deaths. Scott Brown should protect the people not polluters,” the voice on the ad says. Other environmental organizations in Massachusetts, including the local branch of the Sierra Club, point out that Brown was the only member of the Massachusetts congressional delegation to vote against clean air standards. According to OpenSecrets.org and the Federal Election Commission, Brown has received more than $108,000 from the oil and gas, electric utility and coal and mining companies since he ran for the office just over a year ago.
Despite the negative attacks, Brown is not holding back. He called the League of Women Voters “pawns” of his critics. Others in Brown’s corner have criticized the advertising campaign for using children against the senator.
Brown — who enjoys favorable numbers in the Bay State, numbers that are higher than those held by Democrats Sen. John Kerry, Gov. Deval Patrick and President Barack Obama — faces reelection in 2012. To date, no strong Democratic challenger has emerged to take on Brown for the seat once occupied by the late Sen. Edward Kennedy. Considering Brown’s popularity, the League of Women Voters’ campaign might a test of the senator's vulnerability.
Take a look at the video and let us know what you think in the comments below.
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.
You might also like:
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.

KPC
May 04 2011 at 7:43 PM
It is hard to believe that he could not have known that, though this vote would make the Koch brothers happy, it would not fare as well in MA.
This really is a tough week for Brown - in addition to attacking the messenger on this rather than his bad vote, he was caught in lie and at minimum an intentionally misleading comment in one Fox interview:
- the lie was that he said that he spoke of possibly going to Afghanistan for two weeks of training because someone leaked it - when in fact, it was Brown
.... More
himself speaking to a Boston Globe reporter.
- He also said that he had seen photos of a dead OBL and had been briefed - when in fact is that the briefings had no photos - and the one he saw was from the internet.
- Log in or register to post comments
- Report This Post

Moudsie
May 04 2011 at 4:57 PM
Okay, so Scott Brown was just on TV and said (I think -- it's so hard to figure out what they actually mean) that even though he voted to do away with the regulations on clean air [to vote with the other boys in his club of GOPers] it didn't pass -- and he wouldn't do that to his children and the people of the Commonwealth. So, does that mean he voted in support of doing away with any regulations, because he knew it wouldn't pass, so that makes it okay? And then he said he felt this ad was "political"
.... More
as "they" wanted the seat back for the Democrats. No, really, political -- hey, Scott aren't you in politics. I guess he goes along with the adage "baffle 'em with BS." OMG
- Log in or register to post comments
- Report This Post

Email







Join the conversation