Political pundit on the latest from Washington, D.C.
With Rahm's departure, will there be a new tone?
Outgoing chief of staff pushed for a bold agenda that came with consequences.
Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:18 PM
BEHIND THE SCENES: Rahm Emanuel's results-oriented approach left energy policy in limbo. (Photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)
“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”
From there it was clear the administration’s agenda would be bold. America was in crisis mode. The incoming chief of staff was clear: the Obama administration was going to support policy measures that addressed the crises America faced.
For the economic mess, we got the stimulus package, and a promise for some Wall Street regulatory reform down the road. But before Congress would get its chance to sound off at Goldman Sachs, there was a crisis called healthcare to deal with.
Emanuel had been hesitant to take on the issue. He knew it would drain energy from the administration, but energy was something the president had at the time. While the stimulus vote in Congress had revealed the beginnings of deep partisan war on Capitol Hill, the Obama gas tank was full.
Healthcare became an energy hog. It transformed the Obama administration from a Toyota Prius into a Hummer going up hill full of sandbags. Through reconciliation, healthcare made it across the finish line, but the damage had been done.
The Obama tank ran out of gas just in time to tackle energy. As oil spewed into the Gulf of Mexico, the world’s attention focused on stopping the leak. On Capitol Hill, attention narrowed to offshore drilling regulation. Despite Interior Secretary Ken Salazar’s attempts to clean up the Minerals Management Service (MMS), the department remained a mess by the time the disaster hit. The Obama administration had a perfect storm of a crisis on its hand.
The Emanuel team crafted an Oval Office speech for the president. But as Obama pleaded with Americans to support a new philosophy on energy policy, nothing happened. The engine simply couldn’t take anymore.
So with the announcement that Rahm is out and Pete Rouse is in as chief of staff, will the Obama administration continue playing such a high-stakes game of political poker? The game has come with legislative victories in healthcare and financial reform, but those high points have come at the expense of energy and other issues. It’s hard to tell where this is all going, but the tank is empty.
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.