SPECIAL FEATURES:
Email
New Zealand court rejects global warming challenge
The New Zealand Climate Science Education Trust, a group that rejects human-produced global warming, alleged that a study's findings were not peer reviewed.
Fri, Sep 07 2012 at 3:04 PM
Related Topics:
A concrete wall lining Atafu lagoon to hold back rising sea levels in the New Zealand dependency of Tokelau. Tiny Pacific nations which are most at threat from rising seas due to climate change. (Photo: Michael Field/AFP)
WELLINGTON — New Zealand's High Court on Friday, Sept. 7, dismissed a challenge launched by climate change skeptics against a government research agency's finding that the temperature had risen in the past century.
The court backed the science that led the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) to conclude that New Zealand's climate warmed almost one degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) between 1909 and 2009.
New Zealand Climate Science Education Trust, a private body that rejects the argument that human activity has caused global warming, went to court alleging NIWA's methodology was flawed and its findings were not peer reviewed.
Judge Geoffrey Venning rejected the allegations in a written ruling handed down Friday, saying NIWA acted "in accordance with internationally recognized and credible scientific methodology."
"The plaintiff does not succeed on any of its challenges... the application for judicial review is dismissed and judgment entered for the defendant," he wrote.
Venning ordered the trust to pay NIWA's costs.
NIWA was not immediately available for comment but a group of six climate change scientists from New Zealand tertiary institutions including Wellington's Victoria University and the University of Otago welcomed the decision.
"The basic science of climate change has been established for well over a century, and almost all scientists active in climate research agree that human activity is causing the climate to change," they said in a statement.
"For a small group of scientists to appeal to a court of law to find otherwise is bizarre."
They said climate change had caused glaciers to retreat in New Zealand over the past century, as well as rising sea-levels globally and a reduction in arctic sea ice.
"This misguided action of a small group adds confusion to a simple issue — the world is warming and future generations of New Zealanders will have to deal with the consequences," they added.
Copyright 2012 AFP Global Edition
You might also like:
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
EDITORS' PICKS
Advertisement
TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON
- 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
- 20 ways to reuse coffee grounds, tea leaves
- 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
- How much money do you save when baking your own bread?
- Best air-filtering houseplants, according to NASA
- 10 false facts most people think are true
- 15 houseplants to improve indoor air quality
- 8 hair care treatments you can make yourself
- Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
- 9 habits that may do more harm than good
NEWSLETTER
Advertisement
Overpopulation is going to kill is first. There is just too many darn people on the planet. That is our destiny, embrace it. The era of mankind will be ending soon. Is that really a bad thing all we are are parsites to this planet. Once we suck it dry we all die.
Precisely. Absolutely right. The Wachowski brothers (and many before them - I cite their work as a modern contextual reference) got it right in the Matrix. We are the cancer of this planet. A flawed species, and we are selecting ourselves for extinction.
we are killing our planet thats a fact. Tooooo many in the Government and other Billlionairs will lose money to fix the problem so get your Great-Grandchildren ready for year around tans and heat strokes.
However it is not just global warming, more like world wide climate change. We are helping it along, but not as much as people say. Climate change has been happening since the earth was made, it's just natural.
Is it also causing the increase in Antarctic ice over the past 30 plus years? I find it strange that convenient changes in the Arctic are mentioned, but the opposite in the Antarctic are ignored.