Talk of blowing oil leak up is cyclical
Bill Clinton takes his turn to advocate for blowing-up the oil leak. The issue seems to be uniting traditional political adversaries.
OIL SLICK WILLY: If Bill Clinton says we should consider blowing up the oil leak does that make it right? (Credit: AP)
WorldShares
lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20
points now.Learn More Earn Points
|
link:

Comments
I feel think clinton is correct to say we first need to fix the problem. but to think that they are good people is beyond me in all dimensions. they are not doing a damn thing to help. and they know that. Clinton is failing massively when it comes to morals. I want a politicians to state the facts and stop kissing *** to those who put money in his pocket. GROW UP!
157 miles away, we exploded two atomic devices in the 1960s, and then for contrast, set off multiple high explosive devices. We know the salt often found there seals *very* well. Here's the details: kiloseven.blogspot.com/2010/06/open-letter-to-keith-olbermann-on-being.html
Kiloseven's comment seems well-researched and referenced. The great unanswered question is all this speculation by bloggers and lawyers and flacks is why the explosives solution (not necessarily nuclear, surely this could be done with conventional explosives?) isn't in the works. Surely there must be some reason. It's not like the well is salvageable, so if this SEEMS like such an obvious choice, someone, somewhere must see a problem. Wonder what it is?
I fear that conventional explosives won't do the job, for they don't generate the stellar heat required to fuse the rock, salt, and/or sand. BP is close-mouthed about the composition of earth they drilled through to reach the reservoir of oil, and were I Barry O'bama, I surely would pry those facts out of BP, tout suite. In the absence of their cooperation, I would surely ask 10 Downing Street for their consent to test the sealing device on BP HQ; wish this had occurred a year or two ago,.... More
Aren't toxic dispersants bad enough? You would propose polluting the ocean further with nuclear radiation the radioactive dust created when a nuclear weapon explodes. "This radioactive dust, consisting of hot particles, is a kind of radioactive contamination. It can lead to the contamination of ground and the animal food chain.In a land or water surface burst, heat vaporizes large amounts of earth or water, which is drawn up into the radioactive cloud. This material becomes radioactive when it.... More




























