Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Saturday, May 18, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Earth Matters › Space
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
End of U.S. shuttle program poses safety risks, panel says
'Lack of clarity and constancy of purpose among NASA, Congress and the White House is a safety concern,' the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel said.

By

Agence France-Presse
Thu, Jan 13 2011 at 6:49 PM

Related Topics:

NASA
Russian rocket

SPACE PROGRAM: The safety panel also noted that once the shuttle fleet retires later this year, the U.S., Europe and Japan will be dependent on Russian Soyuz vehicles for transport to the International Space Station. (Photo: Dmitry Lovetsky/AP)

A climate of uncertainty in the U.S. space program combined with the approaching retirement of the shuttle missions presents safety risks, a government advisory panel said Thursday.
 
"Lack of clarity and constancy of purpose among NASA, Congress, and the White House is a key safety concern," the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel said in its annual report.
 
"From the aspect of safety, the lack of a defined mission can negatively affect workforce morale and the ability to attract and maintain the necessary skill sets needed for this high-technology venture," it said.
 
The report came on the heels of news that NASA was bickering with U.S. senators over plans to build a new spacecraft and rocket to replace the shuttle mission by 2016.
 
The space agency says the current vision for a new rocket and spacecraft would be too complicated to finish in the time constraints set forth by Congress, and too expensive given the budget it is allocated.
 
Meanwhile, the safety panel noted that once the shuttle fleet retires later this year, the United States, Europe and Japan will be dependent on Russian Soyuz vehicles for transport to the International Space Station.
 
While it did not criticize the safety record of the Russian space program, the panel said that because only one form of transport is available, risks will inherently increase.
 
"Any time one depends on a single-source solution, one runs the added risk of interruption in service due to some unforeseen contingency affecting that source," it said.
 
"We have no evidence that Progress and Soyuz will be anything but as reliable as they have been; however, risk rises as the simple offshoot of dependence on a single-source provider."
 
The panel said it would continue to study "the risks inherent in this single-source service scenario" over the coming year.
 
Plans to get a commercial spacecraft in operation to replace the shuttle flights are about a year behind schedule, it said.
 
The advisory group also urged NASA, Congress and the White House to "quickly reach a consensus position on the agency's future and our nation's future in space."
 
The report noted that President Barack Obama has signed a bill "that reoriented the Agency's human spaceflight efforts; however, NASA?s future human exploration mission plans are uncertain."
 
The panel was first established by Congress in 1968 after a deadly fire killed three astronauts on the Apollo I during a launch pad test.
 
Copyright 2011  AFP Global Edition

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:

EDITORS' PICKS

tease kids in woods

line

tease stargazing

line

tease hand

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  2. Stone Age people may have battled against a zombie apocalypse
  3. How much money do you save when baking your own bread?
  4. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  5. Best air-filtering houseplants, according to NASA
  6. 7 recipes featuring fresh fava beans
  7. Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
  8. 10 false facts most people think are true
  9. A day in the life of the human hand
  10. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS