How dependent are we on foreign oil?
As the U.S. considers new offshore drilling, a major motivator is reducing its reliance on foreign oil. Here's a look at where U.S. oil imports come from.
By Russell McLendonWed, Mar 31 2010 at 11:45 AM EST
8
Oil helped fuel the United States' prosperous 20th century, and the growing country built its infrastructure with that in mind. But the sprawling suburbs and far-flung freeways ended up locking America into long-term dependence on the nonrenewable sludge, which passed coal as the nation's favorite fossil in 1951.U.S. oil production peaked 19 years later, and America suddenly was faced with outsourcing a pillar of its business model. From 1900 until 1969, the country's oil imports had risen by an average of 70.7 million barrels per decade, but in the '70s they rose by nearly 1.9 billion. Making matters worse was political instability in the Middle East, where the United States got much of its imported oil at the time. Following the 1973 Yom Kippur War and again during the 1979-'81 Iran hostage crisis, Americans cut back on oil use, and gasoline consumption dipped for the first time since World War II. But that conservative spirit didn't last.
|
WorldShares lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20 points now.
Learn More |
Earn Points
What's this? |
Supply and command
Despite building a friendlier portfolio of oil providers since the '70s, however, the United States still heavily relies on several complicated sources. About 1.6 million barrels a day still come from the Persian Gulf — enough to yield 32 million gallons of gasoline, fueling roughly 2 million cars with 16-gallon gas tanks. And while longtime ally Saudi Arabia supplies most of that (nearly 660 million barrels in 2008), history has shown international oil alliances can fluctuate wildly. Iraq (229 million barrels), Kuwait (80 million) and Oman (6.7 million) are also consistent Middle Eastern sources.
Another 19 percent of U.S. oil imports come from Africa, mainly Nigeria (361 million barrels in '08). That country's pipelines and other oil facilities have suffered from militant attacks since 2005 — including vandalism, kidnappings and violent takeovers — causing some foreign workers and companies to flee. Other top African suppliers of U.S. oil include Algeria (200 million barrels), Angola (188 million), Libya (38 million), Chad (38 million) and Equatorial Guinea (28 million).
Western Hemisphere sources present problems, too. Venezuela has had a belligerent political relationship with the United States in recent years; while it exported about 380 million barrels of crude oil here in 2008, that's down from 474 million in 2004 and 508 million in 1997. Mexico, currently the United States' No. 3 overall foreign supplier, is beginning to suffer its own drop in production, and many analysts believe Mexican oil production has already peaked.
A line in the sands
Even oil from Canada — close to the United States politically, culturally and geographically — carries baggage. Output has steadily declined in the crude oil fields Canada relied on for the last 50 years, and while the country has had success with oil shale and offshore drilling, neither is as efficient or simple.
Oil shale, a sludgy sediment embedded in deposits called tar sands or oil sands (see photo at right), makes up nearly half of all Canadian oil output and is expected to grow in coming years, more than offsetting the country's dwindling production of conventional crude. In addition to reaping the benefits of the vast tar sands to the north, the United States also has the largest oil shale deposits in the world — holding up to 1.8 trillion barrels of petroleum — underneath the Rocky Mountains, especially Colorado, Utah and Wyoming.But getting oil this way is a messy, expensive and energy-intensive process. Oil shale is to oil much like what lignite is to coal: an undercooked, premature version of it. Oil began as ancient aquatic organisms that settled to the bottoms of seas and lakes after they died, became buried in the Earth's crust, and were pressed and heated over hundreds of millions of years. Oil shale is simply oil that's not as far along in this process, having been subjected to less pressure and heat over the millennia.
Since it's solid, bitumen (the heavy oil extracted from the shale) must be mined rather than pumped, which means extracting it often carries all the same ecological dangers of strip mining and open-pit mining. It also requires heavy use of natural gas and water, which further adds to the environmental footprint of using oil as fuel. And once the shale is mined, it must be heated up to extremely high temperatures to extract liquid petroleum from it, a process that has kept oil shale from being commercially viable almost everywhere but Canada.
Low reservations
Aside from its untapped oil shale deposits, the United States has about 21 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, which includes drillable reservoirs as well as oil-storage facilities like the Strategic Petroleum Reserve — underground salt caverns along the Gulf Coast that contain the world's largest emergency supply of crude oil. American oil usage would certainly drop if imports somehow dried up, but even at half of today's consumption rate, U.S. oil reserves would be used up in 60 years. Worldwide, half of all commercially available oil may have already been depleted; even conservative estimates expect oil production to peak by 2040.There are still untapped oil deposits scattered around the world — including some on North America's Outer Continental Shelf and other offshore areas — and even deeper pockets of oil shale in the Rocky Mountains. But as the U.S. Geological Survey points out, "The simple inescapable fact is that the world's supply of petroleum is finite and nonrenewable."
But until natural gas and renewable sources begin filling enough of its energy needs, the United States will likely continue pouring oil on troubled waters. And since Americans still use four times more crude every day than the country can produce itself, much of that oil will likely cross troubled waters to get here, too.
Editor's note: This article has been updated since it was originally published on Jan. 29, 2009.
Photos: CDC, Utah Geological Survey, U.S. Energy Department
Also on MNN:
 WorldShares
lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20
points now.Learn More Earn Points
|
CLOSE
link:
link:
Comments
Sweet Violet
07/05/2010 21:12 PM
How dependent can the United States possibly be on foreign oil when the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is gushing an estimated 100,000 barrels of oil per day into the ocean -- and this has been going on for over two months at this point? Do the math. . . the dependency on foreign oil story is a fiction.
Fred Wallace
10/01/2009 06:28 AM
19.5 million used a day. 9.78 imported + 4.89 domestic = 14.67 total. Where does the extra 4.83 million come from?
Also, the graph shows VERY different figures, at 20,000 imported and 5,000 domestic. Even if the scale is off, that's way more than twice (actually about 4x) imported versus domestic.
If you want to make people believe there's a problem (which there is), present your data properly, with fact checks, sources (yes I see the EIA cited), and speculation\explanation on.... More
rmclendon
10/02/2009 21:28 PM
Hi Fred, thanks for commenting and for pointing out the mistake in the graphic; it's now fixed. As for your question about daily U.S. oil use, the problem is you're comparing two different statistics. The U.S. imports 9.78 million barrels of crude oil every day and produces another 4.95 million, and consumes about 9 million barrels a day of that as motor gasoline. But the country consumes a total of 19.5 million barrels of net petroleum daily, which includes petroleum products other than crude.... More
Anonymous
09/14/2009 07:53 AM
It says 19 years later not 19 years ago. Sorry my bad.
Anonymous
09/14/2009 07:49 AM
Check your math we use 19.5 million per day but only import 9.78 and that is double what we produce? Where does the rest come from, if we don't produce it or import it? You should note that the 19.5 is not just oil usage. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/cfapps/STEO_Query/steotables.cfm?periodType=Ann...
Also oil peaked in the 1970's and not 1990, 19 years ago. .... More
Alan Septoff
08/12/2009 10:03 AM
At present, the Canadian oil sands are the largest and dirtiest energy project in the world. To find out more: http://dirtyoilsands.org
Anonymous
08/12/2009 00:03 AM
The author would do well correct his inference that oil shale and oil sands/tar sands are the same thing. The organic matter in oil shale is known as kerogen, and it is part of the shale's solid matrix (e.g. oil shale appears to be a rock). The organic matter in oil sands is known as bitumen and it is mixed with the sand but not part of it (e.g. it appears to be a tarry substance with silt in it, kind of like a stiff toothpaste).
rmclendon
08/12/2009 15:29 PM
Thanks for pointing this out. We've updated the text so the distinction is clearer.
