SPECIAL FEATURES:
Email
What is the Gulf of Mexico dead zone?
The giant, lifeless expanse appears every summer, but historic flooding along the Mississippi River could make 2011 a record-breaking year.
Tue, May 24 2011 at 6:30 AM
Related Topics:
The Mississippi River is America's aquatic aorta, pumping life through 2,350 miles of U.S. heartland. Its network of tributaries covers 1.2 million square miles, drains 30 states and is the third-largest river basin on Earth, after the Amazon and Congo.But due to a confluence of factors, the Mississippi has also become an accomplice in the deaths and displacement of countless marine animals — not to mention the economic suffering of humans who depend on them. As the river empties into the Gulf of Mexico, it inadvertently feeds the area's "dead zone," a low-oxygen wasteland that flares up every summer, rendering swaths of ocean unlivable. And thanks to historic floods in 2011, experts say this year may be much worse than usual.
The Gulf dead zone is the largest in the U.S. and second-largest of more than 400 worldwide, a total that has grown exponentially since the 1960s. Smaller dead zones have appeared in other U.S. waterways, too, including Lake Erie, Chesapeake Bay, Long Island Sound and Puget Sound, and on many global coastlines.
The Gulf dead zone owes its size — nearly 4 million acres in recent summers — to the mighty Mississippi, which collects tons of agricultural and urban runoff from Midwestern farms and cities like Minneapolis, St. Louis, Memphis, Baton Rouge and New Orleans. When all that flows into the Gulf, it feeds oversized algae blooms that indirectly cause "hypoxia," or low oxygen levels.
That process is now on steroids in 2011, as the swollen Mississippi River breaks flood records that have stood since the 1920s and '30s. Periodic flooding is normal, but the river's surrounding landscape has also changed dramatically in recent decades, with more paved surfaces to worsen natural floods, and more synthetic fertilizers, animal waste and other nutrient-rich pollutants waiting for a ride south. As marine scientist and dead-zone expert Nancy Rabalais tells MNN, the chemical-laden floods of 2011 could fuel the biggest Gulf dead zone ever seen. "The best predictor is the river's nitrate load in May," Rabalais says. "And the amount that's coming down right now indicates it's going to be the largest one ever. It could be 5, 10, 15 percent larger."
That's not just a problem for sea life, either: With gas prices high and many fishermen and shrimpers still recovering from the Gulf oil spill, chasing their prey past a supersized dead zone might be cost-prohibitive, Rabalais adds. "When the water is hypoxic to less than 2 parts per million, any fish, shrimp or crabs in that area have to leave. So that will significantly decrease the area where you can conduct fishing," she says. "Inshore fisheries in Louisiana have smaller boats, so many of them just won't be able to fish or trawl. The distance required and the fuel costs right now could keep them in port."
When algae attack
Dead zones are ecological disasters, but they're caused by an otherwise upstanding citizen: phytoplankton (pictured), the floating cornerstone of the oceans' food web. Under normal conditions, they toil thanklessly below the surface, making life as we know it possible. They produce about half of the oxygen we breathe, and play crucial roles in ecosystems the world over.Yet for all their benefits, phytoplankton aren't known for self-restraint — overfeed them and they'll suddenly surge out of control, forming huge "algal blooms" that can stretch for miles, often choking out other life. Sometimes they release a flood of toxins, such as devastating red tides, and sometimes they're bizarre yet apparently benign, like the furry, 12-mile-long "blob" that was discovered off the north coast of Alaska in 2009 (see video below).
Algae accumulations are common in many waterways around the planet, and a bloom doesn't necessary spell doom. The Alaska blob eventually drifted out to sea with no visible harm done, and smaller blooms occasionally float down even small rivers and streams. But depending on the type and the amount of algae involved, a run-of-the-mill plankton party can quickly escalate into a "harmful algal bloom," or HAB.
Only a fraction of the world's algae species are toxic, but things get ugly when they get together. Probably the most notorious toxic algae are those responsible for red tide — rosy plumes that billow below the surface (pictured), soon followed by the stench of poisoned, rotting fish. The toxin usually irritates the eyes and skin of people who swim during red tides, and can even become airborne, creating a "stinging gas" that hovers over a beach. Other toxic algae may pass their poisons slowly up the food web by bioaccumulation, causing ailments like ciguatera fish poisoning, which can involve nausea, vomiting and neurologic symptoms.Nontoxic blooms are no saints either, since the large, slimy mats they generate often interfere with a wide range of coastal business, from the feeding habits of right whales and fishermen to the antics of would-be beach-goers. They can also smother coral reefs and seagrass beds, endangering the diverse animals living there, including some commercially important fish.
Not even the worst algae blooms, however, create hypoxic zones on their own. A true dead zone is a team effort — individual algae within a bloom die and rain into the depths below, where they're digested by deep-water bacteria, a process that consumes oxygen. Yet even with this sudden oxygen drain, wind-driven ocean churning normally stirs down enough oxygenated surface water to cure any temporary hypoxia. Certain natural conditions, namely warm weather and a layering of fresh and salty surface water, are often needed for a dead zone to form.The northern Gulf of Mexico, of course, has plenty of both. Its dead zone grows in the summer because, since heat rises, warm surface waters and cooler bottom waters create a stable water column, discouraging the vertical churning that would carry down oxygen from above. In addition, the Gulf is constantly being doused with freshwater from the Mississippi River, forming a fluid buffer on the surface that traps oxygen-depleted saltwater below (see illustration).
The biggest overall contributor to the Gulf of Mexico's dead zone, however, is the entire Mississippi River Basin, which pumps an estimated 1.7 billion tons of excess nutrients into Gulf waters each year, causing an annual algal feeding frenzy. Those nutrients come largely from agricultural runoff — soil, manure and fertilizers — but also from fossil-fuel emissions and various household and industrial pollutants.
Cars, trucks and power plants contribute to aquatic overnutrition by spitting out nitrogen oxides, but they represent "point source" pollutants, meaning their emissions come from discernible sources that can be monitored and regulated. Much more frustrating to control are nonpoint source pollutants, which comprise most of what's washing into the Gulf. This diverse flood of pollutants flows from driveways, roads, roofs, sidewalks and parking lots into streams and rivers, but much of it comes from large-scale farming in the Midwest. Nitrogen- and phosphorus-rich fertilizers are widely blamed for recent spikes of hypoxia in the Gulf. (See the NOAA video below for more.)
Fish aren't usually killed by the dead zone unless it traps them against the coast, since they can outswim the dropping oxygen levels and move somewhere else. The ones that get away could take a valuable coastal fishing industry with them, however, wreaking economic havoc on shore. The ones that stay may suffer even worse — carp that continuously live in the hypoxic zone have been found to have smaller reproductive organs, raising the prospect of population crashes alongside mass migrations.
Some bottom-dwelling creatures don't have the option of leaving the sea floor, making them the No. 1 casualty of dead zones. Certain worms, crustaceans and other animals choke as the oxygen is all sucked away by bacteria, meaning they don't come back when the oxygen does; instead, a smaller number of short-lived species takes their place. Large snails, starfish and sea anemones largely disappeared from the dead zone 30 to 40 years ago.
Keeping hypoxia at bay
The Mississippi River has briefly flowed backward before, during the 1811-'12 New Madrid earthquakes, and that might not sound so bad given all the pollution it's currently feeding into the Gulf. The problem isn't the river itself, though, but what's in it. Regulating nonpoint source pollutants is difficult since they come from so many different places, and fears of cramping the Midwestern farming economy have helped forestall major regulations to control nutrient runoff. The EPA and several other federal and state agencies formed a dead zone task force, and the EPA's Gulf of Mexico Program recently hosted Iowa officials in Louisiana to award them for their efforts to reduce runoff. There are ways to combat existing nutrient pollution, such as planting wetlands or raising shellfish colonies to absorb nutrients, but many farmers are already making small changes on their own, like no-till planting or improved drainage systems. See the links below for more on dead zones and ways to reduce runoff:
- EPA: Managing Nonpoint Source Pollution from Agriculture
- USGS: The Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone
- NOAA: Hypoxia and Nutrient Pollution
- NOAA: Harmful Algal Blooms
- CDC: Harmful Algal Blooms
Alaska algal bloom video courtesy North Slope Borough, Alaska
Dead zone video courtesy NOAA
Photos courtesy NASA, NOAA, USGS
Editor's Note: This story has been updated since it first appeared on July 28, 2009.
You might also like:
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
EDITORS' PICKS
Advertisement
TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON
- 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
- 20 ways to reuse coffee grounds, tea leaves
- 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
- How much money do you save when baking your own bread?
- Best air-filtering houseplants, according to NASA
- 10 false facts most people think are true
- 15 houseplants to improve indoor air quality
- 8 hair care treatments you can make yourself
- Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
- 9 habits that may do more harm than good
NEWSLETTER
Advertisement
yay
If we know what is largely causing the dead zones, why don't we go to further lengths to prevent them? It says it's because we don't want to "cramp the Midwestern farming company" or something like that, yet the dead zones are "cramping" many other things. Like the people that fish in that area--that takes away jobs for them, and it makes it so the fish might not be safe to eat. Why does it seem like we're sacrificing these things for one thing that has so many side effects?
Has anyone seen anything on the effect that consuming the water near the Mississippi river run-off Dead Zone causes or eating the fish has on humans?
We straighten the flow of our streams and rivers too much. They need to be churned up more to oxygenate the water more allowing biological breakdowns to happen farther upstream and in greater quantity.
Read Michael Pollen's book - The Omnivore's Dilemna. We produce bushel after bushel of cheap, commoditized corn using industrial, petroleum fertilizer that runs into the river. Industry needs a cheap raw material to make packaged foods with. As usual, society foots the bill.
I never knew the algaecides I use in our pond contribute to so many problems downstream
While they may be a major factor, farms aren't the only cause of this dead zone. The way most municipalities and developments manage their storm water retention systems also has a very significant effect.
Here is an article on the subject:
http://ezinearticles.com/?A-Call-to-Ban-Copper-Sulfate-%28an-Algaecide%2...
OMgosh dude that is really messed up man!
RT
www.anon-web-tools.tk
that is neat
The past few summers that we've been to the beach, we've seen the effects of this dead zone, whether in the form of algae laden water or red tides that you aren't allowed to swim in. Good to know that someone is paying attention to it and that there is something that can be done.
This is the nastiest article I've ever seen! Not sure I'll be eating any fish coming from the Gulf of Mexico after reading this. With so many contributors to this mess, i don't see a viable option to fix it. It doesn't seem to be limited to just farming, but all industrial polluters of the Mississippi.
This problem will just get worse as time goes on unless there is a major movement to fix it!
If you're still a bit confused (as I was), that second video embedded in the page explains the Dead Zone really well.
I understand that the absence of fish due to the dead zone is bad for the fishing communities in the area, but if the water is full of fertilizer run-off, etc., do we want to be eating those fish anyway?
@Momof2: I agree that as soon as we can clean up the polluted water, we'll get the fish back and have a healthier Earth and healthier bodies.
I've been hearing various people saying that "organic can't feed the world" and "agri-business farms are a must" but the reality is that their fertilizer and pesticides and god-knows-what is running down the rivers and into our major water systems....so we hurt ourselves several ways - eating pesticides, polluting our water, and destroying our fishing industry.
I wish I would be around in 200 years...historians aren't going to believe the various ways we worked at killing ourselves....
Very comprehensive piece about a little-known subject. Thanks, as always, for sharing.