Talk about wet bandits …
Three Oregon teenagers are in tepid water after security staffers with the Portland Water Bureau observed, via surveillance camera, the trio trying to gain access to the city's 49 million-gallon capacity Reservoir 5 — one of three active above-ground reservoirs located within the confines of Mt. Tabor Park in Southeast Portland — at 1 a.m. on Wednesday morning.
Two of the skateboard-toting teens, ages 18 and 19, attempted to scale the fence around the perimeter of Reservoir 5 (one was successful). The third teen, a 19-year-old, allegedly opted to instead urinate through the wrought-iron fence and directly into the reservoir, which provides the city with clean, treated drinking water.
As a result, the Portland Water Bureau has taken the reservoir off-line and made the decision to flush approximately 38 millions of potable water into the Columbia River — that's enough H2O to fill 57 Olympic size swimming pools. The draining and cleaning process will take anywhere between four to six days. To add insult to injury, the reservoir had just been drained and treated to a biannual cleaning.
An announcement, which also includes taped footage of the teens' antics, released by the Portland Water Bureau admits that the health risks involved with the pee breach are “slight.” However, the Bureau abides to not “purposely served tainted water to the public.”
Elaborates David Shaff, Portland Water Bureau administrator: “Our customers have an expectation that their water is not deliberately contaminated. We have the ability to meet that expectation while minimizing public health concerns. We will continue to provide our customers with safe, clean and cold Bull Run water.”
All three teenagers were quickly wrangled up at Mt. Tabor Park and cited with trespassing; the offending pee-er was also cited with public urination. The teens have also been banned from Mt. Tabor Park for 30 days. Criminal charges are not out of the question.
Shaff elaborates to the Oregonian:
When you see the video, he’s leaning right up because he has to get his little wee wee right up to the iron bars. There’s really no doubt what he’s doing. It’s stupid. You can see the sign that says: ‘This is your drinking water. Don’t spit, throw, toss anything in it.’ He’s four feet away from that sign. Unless he’s from North Dakota and just moved here, he’s got to know that’s our drinking water.
Naturally, the Portland Water Bureau has been criticized for its actions with Portlanders complaining that the dumping of 38 million gallons of drinking water was an egregiously wasteful overreaction and also perhaps insensitive considering the H2O-strapped circumstances elsewhere on the West Coast. Nick Fish, the Portland City Commissioner who oversees the Water Bureau, defends the agency's actions, calling them “conservative but correct:”
I didn't have a choice. I don't have the luxury of slicing it too thin when there's a potential risk, however small, to public health. Frankly, it's one of those calls where you know you're likely to be criticized no matter what. The professionals who report to me all said, 'Dump the water. Don't take any chances.' It's the conservative but correct call.
We know we'll get criticized for this, but we have to put public health first.
Also, during a particularly sweltering stretch of weather during the summer of 2008, a couple of young lovebirds were booted from Mt. Tabor Park after being caught bathing, sans clothing, in one of the reservoirs. Authorities opted not to drain the reservoir after that incident as it was not actively in use at the time.
My question to you: Pee-contaminated tap water obviously isn't something that you want flowing through your faucets. But given the extremely slight risk of the public being affected in any way by this incident, do you think the Portland Water Bureau did the right thing by discarding millions upon millions of gallons of perfectly fine potable water?
Via [The Oregonian] via [The Atlantic]
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.