Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Tuesday, June 18, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Earth Matters › Wilderness & Resources
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
Alaska proposes federal takeover of NYC's Central Park
Declaring turnabout is fair play, Alaskans tired of interference from 'East Coast environmentalists' offer a legislative retort.

By

John Platt
Mon, Jan 30 2012 at 4:56 PM
 26

Related Topics:

Wilderness, National Parks, Parks
Central Park

Photo: Dave Bledsoe/Flickr

Alaskan state legislators are tired of interference from East Coast environmentalists into their state's affairs. Hoping to make a point with what Republican state Rep. Kyle Johansen calls "political satire," legislators have introduced a bill that would declare New York City's Central Park "to be a wilderness area and to prohibit any further improvement or development of Central Park unless authorized by an act of Congress."
 
Johansen told the New York Times that he is trying to point out the "hypocrisy" of "those East Coast folks who write a lot of checks to shut down Alaska, while in their own backyard, Manhattan has been turned from a pristine wild island supporting an amazing Muir web of life to having only Central Park left as a green belt."
 
The bill, HJR31, was introduced into the Alaskan state legislature last week. It comes in response to resistance toward opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska to oil development and drilling. Many Alaskan state legislators from both political parties support drilling in AWNR, which became a federally protected area in 1960 and was later expanded in 1980. Congressional approval is required for oil development in the 29,687 square miles of ANWR's "Area 1002."
 
According to the bill's sponsors, Area 1002 represents 8 percent of Alaska, while Central Park represents 6 percent of Manhattan, so it's a fair trade.
 
The bill digs deep into Central Park's history, pointing out that before Henry Hudson landed in Manhattan in 1609, the area was home to at least 1,000 species and 55 different "ecological communities, including 25 terrestrial communities, wetlands, pond and stream communities, and estuarine communities."
 
Interestingly, the Times also dug deep, revealing that candidates for New York's Senate seat really did debate handing Central Park over to the National Park Service back in 1976.
 
Central Park is currently protected as a New York state park, and it falls under the Public Trust Doctrine, which prohibits any non-recreation use of the park without prior state legislature approval, Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe told the Times.
 
The Times' readers had fun with the proposal. "Let them try and take it," wrote one commenter. "I know some guy's from the Bronx and Washington Heights who will meet up with them and give them a tour. Let Alaska go back to keeping an eye on Russia."
 
According to the official Central Park web site, the park is home to 25,000 trees representing 152 species. According to the official AWNR web site, the refuge is home to "42 fish species, 37 land mammals, eight marine mammals, and more than 200 migratory and resident bird species."
 
Also on MNN: When a mixed-used parking garage a charming addition to a neighborhood

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 26
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
Enter your name Feb 03 2012 at 7:00 PM

Damn hippies

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Martin Feb 03 2012 at 6:20 PM

Alaska is not a country, and the ANWR belongs to EVERYONE in the United States of America. So hands off!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Dec 01 2012 at 10:25 AM

Well I'm gonna make it a country! And I'm serious too!!! The US has gotten out of hand and is being tooken over by muslims and Homosexuals.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Feb 03 2012 at 7:00 PM
Alaska is not a country, it is a state and the land in its borders should belong to the state. By your logic, all public land belongs to the United States of America. Federal land all over the country is used for resources. ANWR is not unique and it is ridiculous to treat it as such. Alaska is 1/3 the size of the continental US and there are only 500,000 people living in it. It is empty. Are we not supposed to use any of it? If anything needs protecting it is the tiny strip of land in NYC that the
.... More
New Yorkers have not paved over.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Don Feb 03 2012 at 7:23 PM

All public land *does* belong to the United States of America. By the way, states are subservient to the Federal Government, as in, not as powerful. There was a war about that, remember?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
RainyAlaska Feb 03 2012 at 11:51 AM

That was too funny!!! It's so true. Most people don't take the time to learn the facts about Alaska. They just assume (a lot). I love the quote about the guys from the Bronx. I'd love to see a bunch of NCYers up against some Alaskans. LOL.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Loopman Feb 03 2012 at 11:00 AM
In my own, possibly warped perspective, I would have to suggest that both side look at the cause and affect assoicated with both proposals. What would the cuase ana affect be if Central Park were to be placed under the perview of the Parks Dept. Worst case, the city of NY would no longer have to pay for the upkeep and care of the park. Is that such a bad thing? Likewise, look at the cause and affect of opening the Section 1002 to oil drilling. Thousands of jobs would be created and millions
.... More
of barrels of oil would get sucked out of the ground that would have no impact on the current price of oil and gasoline and the only ones that get what they wanted is the big oil companies. Oh, what's that you say? That's already happening today with fracking and other oil extraction methods? Well, gee imagine that. We're already getting screwed and the big oil companies, with the help of all the greedy a$$holes up in Alaska, want to make it hurt even more. Now that should make us all feel warm and fuzzy all over, huh???
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
KP Feb 03 2012 at 4:42 AM

I fail to see the downside to this proposed bill. How is it satire if it's legitimately a good idea?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Feb 03 2012 at 11:02 AM

NYC has proven to be a good steward of this piece of former pasture land. Unlike Alaska, where they plan on destroying wilderness, the city took this land, set it aside and has maintained it. It's safe from destruction in pursuit of monetary gain

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
hez316 Feb 03 2012 at 6:32 PM

And since the other 95 % is already developed, let's not give Alaskans the same choice?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Feb 03 2012 at 11:37 AM

spoken like a true citzen of the east coast

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
jim sadler Feb 01 2012 at 9:33 PM

The current pollution, over population and climate warming are serious enough issues that all nations may be subject to intervention to derive responsible compliance. The old game is now dead and a new wave must be welcomed by all. There is no choice.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Bob Jan 31 2012 at 6:33 PM

That would be great if whoever wants to develop Central Park was really to blame for federal laws regarding wild areas in Alaska. If Sarah Palin hadn't already proven it, I'd say this gesture offers pretty good evidence that Alaskans (or at least their politicians) have no idea how the US government works. Too bad Bob Ross isn't around; he could show us how to paint happy trees growing next to pipelines.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Indigenous Alas... Feb 03 2012 at 6:37 PM

Oh Gawd, you HAD to mention Sarah! *shudders*

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
KLM Jan 31 2012 at 3:57 PM
There is a small error in the article (not in the bill). The ANILCA section 1002 area is less than 8% of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. ANWR is less than 5% of Alaska. Section 1002 is about 0.35% of Alaska. That's a bit smaller than the portion of New York State that is occupied by Schenectady County (area values from Wikipedia). In my opinion, a very small part of that land would actually be touched even if a large oil discovery were found there. Estimates are on the order of 2000 acres
.... More
of roads and pads. That's on the order of the area of Manhattan from 50th to 110th Streets (the same as Central Park), if you leave out Central Park. I'd invite you to come visit today. But bring a coat, it's -45°F outside.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Savona Bailey-M... Jan 31 2012 at 3:33 PM

The suggestion is really stupid. Alaska stop trying to create a class war. The environment is now everyone's concern. You had temps that was 49 below zero. NYC had 55 degrees in January. Don't you think there's a problem?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Frank Jan 31 2012 at 4:28 PM

Comparing wide open range to a heat island, why don't you leave Alaska alone?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Jan 31 2012 at 9:54 PM

The heat island effect of a city is a idea that comes from the same science and facts that make up the argument for climate change. are you saying that the heat island effect is scientifically relevant yet climate change is not? Should we believe science or shouldnt we?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Feb 03 2012 at 11:41 AM

I'll pass on the Liberal cool-aid.. i dont like the taste

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Feb 01 2012 at 5:11 AM

Nobody should believe an agenda driven psuedo-scientific finding.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
stormi63
stormi63 Jan 31 2012 at 10:15 AM

Good going Alaska!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Feb 03 2012 at 7:00 PM

Not a dumbass

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Cheryl Feb 03 2012 at 11:32 AM

hey, at least they're thinking!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Bub Jan 31 2012 at 9:19 AM

Wouldn't a National Park trump local firearm laws? People would be able to walk around with loaded shotguns in the park. That would be priceless.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Feb 06 2012 at 4:15 AM

State and local laws determine what is legal to carry inside the park. If someone can't wander around with a gun in Boston, they can't take one into Boston National Historical Park either. If they can wander around with a concealed firearm in the state of Alaska, they can do the same in Denali. The only exclusions are the federal buildings where federal employees are regularly working. Firearms are still off limits there.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

Pages

  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Log in or register to post comments

EDITORS' PICKS

tease BBQ grills

line

tease bees

line

tease road trip

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  2. Watch: Sir David Attenborough deals with a band of cannibals the British way
  3. What a grocery store without bees looks like
  4. Yurts: Everything you ever wanted to know but were afraid to ask
  5. Facepalm of the week: Non-GMO salt!?
  6. 10 false facts most people think are true
  7. 5 recipes for garlic scapes
  8. 7 surprising things Pope Francis has done in his first 100 days
  9. Student science experiment finds plants won't grow near Wi-Fi router
  10. Emergency Bra saves you and a friend
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS