Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Thursday, May 23, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Earth Matters › Wilderness & Resources
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
EPA examines well blowout for hazardous substances
The EPA is conducting a study on the safety of fracking and its impact on drinking water, and initial results are expected in late 2012.

By

Reuters
Tue, Apr 26 2011 at 4:18 PM

Related Topics:

EPA, Natural Gas, Shale Gas, Fracking, Water Pollution
fracking

FRACKING: In hydraulic fracturing, drillers blast water, chemicals and sand deep underground to break rocks and release natural gas. (Photo: Ralph Wilson/AP)

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Regulators said on Tuesday they have asked Chesapeake Energy to give information on any hazardous substances released by a Pennsylvania natural gas well that blew out last week.
 
The regional U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has asked for details, including sources of the discharge and the extent of environmental damage.
 
"We want a complete accounting of operations at the site to determine our next steps in this incident and to help prevent future releases of this kind," said Shawn Garvin, the EPA regional administrator.
 
The EPA said it requested the information on Friday about fluids used at the well in hydraulic fracturing, which is also known as fracking. Pennsylvania is taking the lead in investigating the blow out.
 
Chesapeake said it intends to comply with EPA's request and has already communicated with the agency about its response to the incident. Chesapeake is one of the gas producers that voluntarily reveals the fracking fluids it has used at completed wells.
 
The EPA is conducting a two-year study on the safety of fracking and its impact on drinking water. Initial results of the peer-reviewed study are expected in late 2012.
 
In fracking, drillers blast water, chemicals and sand deep underground to break rocks and release natural gas.
 
The EPA also asked Chesapeake whether radiological compounds were present in the fluids or sediment generated as part of the development of the well and effects on any drinking water supplies.
 
Chesapeake, one of Pennsylvania's biggest shale gas producers, last week suspended all seven of its fracking operations in the state after the incident released thousands of gallons of drilling fluid into the surrounding area.
 
On Monday Chesapeake said it replaced a damaged wellhead and gained control of the well that gushed the fluids. Since the well blow out on April 19, Chesapeake shares have risen 3 percent, mirroring a similar rise in the S&P 500.
 
The U.S. EPA said its information request was authorized under the Clean Water Act and other statutes.
 
One analyst said the federal government may keep a close eye on fracking operations after Congressional hearings questioned the quality of the oversight.
 
"Enhanced oversight from the federal EPA is to be expected," Christine Tezak, an energy policy analyst at Robert W. Baird and Co, said in a research note on Tuesday.
 
(Reporting by Timothy Gardner, additional reporting by Edward McAllister in New York; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
 
Copyright 2011  Reuters Environmental Online Report

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:

EDITORS' PICKS

tease snake

line

tease book destinations

line

tease rebound cities

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  2. Superfoods: 11 berries to improve your health
  3. 5 of the best-looking cars ever
  4. Kidnapped women will have chance to adopt Ariel Castro's dogs
  5. Why we turn to dogs when disaster strikes
  6. 10 false facts most people think are true
  7. Bride finds self-esteem by taking a diet from her mirror
  8. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  9. Tornado survivor finds dog during live TV interview
  10. Easy homemade soap
+ Add this to my site

Advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS