Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Tuesday, June 18, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Earth Matters › Wilderness & Resources
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
Gulf of Mexico oil spill: BP scrambles to cap leak with robots
Company uses robotic underwater vehicles to capture an estimated 42,000 gallons of oil that are leaking into the ocean each day.

By

Agence France-Presse
Mon, Apr 26 2010 at 8:44 AM
 8

Related Topics:

Environmental Regulation, Oceans, Offshore Drilling, Gulf Oil Spill, Oil & Gas

CLEANUP UNDER WAY: The spill as seen from space. (Photo: NASA)

British oil giant BP used robotic underwater vehicles Monday to try to cap a leaking well and prevent a growing oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico from developing into an environmental disaster.

 
Satellite images showed the slick had spread by 50 percent in a day to cover an area of 600 square miles, although officials said some 97 percent of the pollution was just a thin veneer on the sea's surface.
 
BP has dispatched skimming vessels to mop up the oil leaking from the debris of the Deepwater Horizon rig, which sank on Thursday, two days after a massive explosion left 11 workers missing and presumed dead.
 
The company said at least four underwater robots, similar to scaled-down submarines, are being employed for a first-of-its-kind attempt to stop the leak by plugging up the leaking well.
 
Doug Suttles, chief operating officer of BP Exploration & Production Suttles told a press conference outside New Orleans Sunday that workers will use a "blowout preventer" — a piece of back-up equipment installed near the wellhead, but which has failed to function properly since the rig went down — to try to plug the leaks.
 
"It has not been done before, but we have the world's best experts working to make it happen," said the BP executive, who warned that if the attempt fails, it might take as long as two to three months to staunch the leaking well.
 
BP said it was trying to activate the giant 450-ton, 50-foot high machine using remotely operated submersible vehicles. At the same time, it is also preparing to drill relief wells that would permanently shut off the oil flow.
 
map oil spill site"Essentially, they're trying to put a cork in a bottle of champagne," Richard Metcalf, a mechanical engineer at the pro-industry Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Association told AFP.
 
BP estimated that the leaks, some 5,000 feet down on the seabed, emanate from two holes in the riser that connects the wellhead to the sunken rig and are releasing 1,000 barrels, 42,000 gallons, of oil a day.
 
The coast guard, which conducted two overflights on Saturday and Sunday to assess the extent of the pollution, described it as a "very serious spill."
 
Five aircraft and 32 spill response vessels — skimmers, tugs, barges and recovery boats — were hoping to resume efforts to mop up the slick after weather delays on Saturday.
 
So far, the slick is not threatening the coast of Louisiana more than 40 miles away, where it could endanger ecologically fragile wetlands that are a paradise for rare waterfowl and other wildlife.
 
"In the trajectory analysis we don't see any impact to any shoreline within the next three days," Charlie Henry, scientific support coordinator of the U.S. government's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, told journalists.
 
BP said chemical products had also been poured into the slick to help the dispersal process and more were in stock.
 
And Steve Benz, head of the independent Marine Spill Response Corporation, said that at BP's request he was mounting the largest response effort in his group's 20-year history and BP officials expressed confidence that they will be able to contain the spill offshore.
 
Still, environmentalists were sounding an alarm about the possible threat to Louisiana's fragile wildlife, and experts said the spill has the potential to be the worst seen in the United States since the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil tanker spill, considered one of the worst man-made environmental disasters.
 
That spill poured nearly 11 million gallons of crude into Alaska's Prince William Sound, devastating some 750 miles of its once pristine shores.
Meanwhile, there was still no news of the 11 missing Horizon crew members.
 
The U.S. Coast Guard, which helped evacuate another 115 to safety after Tuesday's spectacular blast, which shot balls of flame leaping into the night sky, aborted its massive air and sea search on Friday.
 
Investigations are ongoing into the cause of the accident, which would be the worst in decades on a U.S. offshore platform if the missing men are not found.
 
AFP American Edition

 

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 8
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
forresttaft Nov 04 2010 at 6:20 PM
BP is such a joke… they should all be arrested along with the US govt. How long ago did they cap the leak? And how many legitimate claims are still “pending” from damages they suffered back in the beginning of the summer? I happen to know three people that were affected directly by BP’s shady PR tactics and manipulation of our laws, one of whom was a journalist who was almost arrested and charged with felonies for taking pictures of oil covered animals near the coast. Not only is it bad
.... More
enough that thousands of fishers’ lively hoods are ruined for god knows how many years to come, they were paid a pathetic amount of money to clean up BP’s own mess. To add even more insult to injury, BP used Corexit 9527, which contains mainly 2-butoxyethanol, which is very toxic. You wouldn’t have to be a scientist to know that, since in the first week of using it over 70 fisherman ended up at the hospital. Of course if you even inquired about this, I’m sure the govt (which is pretty much owned by oil companies) would deal with you quite quickly, let alone taking pictures of it in an attempt to run a story on it. If you didn’t know already, the govt is doing what they do best… crapping on the 1st amendment: naturalnews.com/029130_Gulf_of_Mexico_censorship.html. My friend who almost got arrested on felony charges simply went out on a boat into about 30 feet of water and used a water proof cam to photograph one of the many oil plumes forming at the bottom of the surface (which BP vehemently denies). Now here comes the hilarious part. He switched the film in his camera with a blank one in the event they were stopped by police, which they were as soon as they got back to shore. They let him go but still took his name down, and what do you know... later that night, 2 guys wearing black hoodies attempted to break into his house. He caught pics of them on his home security system (he saved the pics… adt burglar alarms camera break in photos). Hmm, I wonder who paid these guys to break in and what they were after? Definitely not BP or our govt, that’s for sure!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
nwindianaguy7 May 11 2010 at 11:43 AM

Enter your comments here
idea 1: crimp the line shut with hydraulic jaws.
idea 2: install a "pancake" if it has flanged joints.
idea 3: install a internal expandable plug and rerod with friction clamps.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Bruce Apr 29 2010 at 5:17 AM
BP is known in industry as the worst major in regards of safety. Their culture promotes a just in time attitude. This time they were not just in time. Having worked in the industry for 25 yrs., if you blindly asked me to guess which major was responsible for a oil blowout and environmental catastophere in the GOM, BP w2ouild be the answer. look at their ecent history with Texas City, almost losing the Thunderhorse platform, and their lack of maintaining infrastructure on the North Slope. While BP
.... More
laughingly says the right things in the press, they have a clear utter disregard for the environment and safety. This is a company that should not be allowed to operate on US territory.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Sharon Apr 27 2010 at 3:11 PM

something to consider: could draining all the oil out of the earths crust maybe (just maybe) create all these earthquakes, volcanos etc. If oil is comming out of the earth pressurized, then releasing the pressure as we drill more and more deeper wells may just have something to do with our earth shifting. Just a thought.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Apr 29 2010 at 7:06 PM

Enter your comments here

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Bruce Apr 29 2010 at 5:19 AM

NO

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Nick Apr 26 2010 at 9:46 PM

Why can't the military put a large bunker buster explosive on top of the well to colapse the well to seal the hole and stop the leak.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Lonepsi Apr 30 2010 at 5:42 AM

Imagine one second if a blowup do not works well: a seabed destroyed and one, two or more leaks.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

EDITORS' PICKS

tease yosemite

line

tease home remedies

line

tease dog to work

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  2. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  3. 11 ways to open a stuck jar lid
  4. Too beautiful to be real? 16 surreal landscapes found on Earth
  5. CFL vs. incandescent: Battle of the bulb
  6. Henry Cavill's 'Man of Steel' workout and diet
  7. Easy homemade soap
  8. 15 houseplants for improving indoor air quality - A breath of fresh air
  9. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  10. 10 false facts most people think are true
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS