• Welcome
  • Community
  • Blogs
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Join
  • Log in
Follow MNN    
MNN - Mother Nature Network - Envrionmental News
improve your world

 

Friday, May 25, 2012
  • Earth Matters

    Browse All » Animals Weather Energy Politics Space Translating Uncle Sam Wilderness & Resources

  • Health

    Browse All » Allergies Fitness & Well-Being Healthy Spaces

  • Lifestyle

    Browse All » Arts & Culture Travel Natural Beauty & Fashion Recycling Responsible Living

  • GREEN TECH

    Browse All » Computers Gadgets & Electronics Research & Innovations Transportation

  • Eco-Biz & Money

    Browse All » Green Workplace Personal Finance Sustainable Business Practices

  • Food & Drink

    Browse All » Beverages Healthy Eating Recipes

  • Your Home

    Browse All » At Home Organic Farming & Gardening Remodeling & Design

  • family

    Browse All » Babies & Pregnancy Family Activities Pets Protection & Safety

Tweet
Pin It
Email Bookmark and ShareShare
WorldShares lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20 points now.
Learn More

Earn Points
What's this?
MNN.COM›Earth Matters›

Wilderness & Resources

Assignment Earth: Mountain top removal

Read more: ASSIGNMENT EARTH, NATURAL RESOURCES

In Appalachia, a last-minute change in mining rules by the Bush Administration affects how coal companies can dump debris in watersheds -- a major environmental impact from mountaintop-removal mining operations. (Video: Assignment Earth)

 

Read the transcript

[explosions, running water, and large machinery noises throughout]
>>  In Appalachia, blasting away mountain tops to reach coal underneath provides jobs for thousands and electricity for millions of Americans.  But this type of mining destroys forests and streams.  Environmentalists say new federal mining rules will only make things worse.
>>  We’ve expected this weakening for a long time.  It’s a parting gift to the coal industry, really, from the Bush Administration.
>>  The old buffer-zone rule was tougher on paper, but rarely enforced.  Since the mid-1990’s, more than 1,000 miles of streams in Appalachia have been buried by mining debris.  Coal companies say the new rules will give greater protection to watersheds.
>>  The allegations that this is going to open the gates for a lot of environmental harm and a lot of additional mining, that just simply isn't true.
>>  After mountain peaks are blown up, massive machines move in to extract the coal.  The mine is then covered, but millions of tons of rock and dirt are left over. 
>>  You've got to have a place to put it.  And where you put it is in the lower elevations.
>>  The industry term is “valley fill.”  It is a common practice in Appalachia, where one-third of the nation’s coal is mined.  Invoking the Clean Water Act, opponents have blocked new mining permits in Kentucky and West Virginia since 2007.  But that is now set to change.
>>  With the transparency, with the clarity, and with all of that coming, we’re hoping that litigation is minimized.
>>  Under the new rules, coal companies must minimize environmental impacts and find reasonable alternatives to dumping their waste within 100 feet of a stream.  But words like “reasonable” are not defined.  And phrases like “to the extent possible” are not explained. 
>>  That’s really an attempt to hide the true purpose of the rule making, which is to weaken the law by taking credit for requiring minimization, which is already part of the law and has been for 25 years.
>>  Coal companies say the new rules will put more people to work and actually tighten safeguards by forcing them to pile more debris over the mountaintops they level.  Opponents say the rules give coal operators legal cover to dump rock and dirt in the upper valleys of mountains where streams begin.
>>  If it weren’t so sad, it would be funny.  The Bush Administration goes out on a low note here, failing to enforce the Clean Water Act and now weakening the Surface Mining Act, and claiming that it’s strengthening it.
>>  The Obama Administration cannot stop coal companies from filling in valleys without first changing the mining rules it has inherited, and they were five years in the making.  Mining opponents hope Congress and the new President will act much more quickly than that to undo them.
>>For Assignment Earth, I’m Gary Strieker.


You might also like:
Related Topics: Assignment Earth, Natural Resources

Related Videos

Assignment Earth: New uranium mining in New Mexico
Assignment Earth: Controlling dangerous chemicals
Assignment Earth: Plans for offshore oil drilling worry native Alaskans
Assignment Earth: New rules for Yellowstone bison

Comments

Follow this conversation
Add your comment
View:
  • All (0)

Add your comment

Sign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below.
    Log in or
    create an account
     
    •  
Used only for emailed comments and will not be displayed with your post
Notify me with an email when other people comment on this article.
The posting of advertisement, profanity or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our Terms of Use

EDITORS' PICKS

tease to asteroids

tease to pet facials

tease to emotional eating

ADVERTISEMENT

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered

CONNECT WITH MNN

Follow @twitterapi
 Tumblr
 Google +

ADVERTISEMENT



Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Advisory Board
  • Editors' Blog
  • Press
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Service
  • WorldShares

MNN Tools

  • Advice
  • Blogs
  • Day in History
  • Eco-glossary
  • Infographics
  • Lists
  • Photos
  • Videos

Connect

  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Contests
  • Idea Lab
  • Mixed Greens
  • Newsletters
  • Polls
  • RSS

Channels

  • Earth Matters
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Green Tech
  • Eco-Biz & Money
  • Your Home
  • Family
  • State Reports

Follow MNN

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Google+
  • StumbleUpon
 

Copyright © 2012 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE
 
SPONSORS