FDA delays acting on BPA
The FDA will wait on new research before acting on BPA.
Mon, Dec 28 2009 at 2:00 PM EST
3
It was supposed to be here by the end of November, but now it looks like it may be months or even years before the FDA officially offers its updated position on BPA, or bisphenol A. The agency is apparently waiting to see the results of a host of new government-funded studies before taking a stance on the contentious issue of banning BPA from products designed for children.The results from some of the studies will be available in a few months; others will take years. It's unclear exactly how long the agency will postpone its decision.
The FDA has been presented with a number of studies in support of a BPA ban, including animal studies showing that large doses of BPA can cause abnormal sexual development. However, there is bitter disagreement among scientists about the risk posed by the small doses most people are exposed to.
This FDA delay is unexpected for those who have been watching and waiting for the agency to make a decision. In June, the FDA's new chief, Margaret Hamburg, promised that the agency would reconsider its earlier conclusion that BPA is safe. A few months later, the FDA's Science Advisory Board held a public hearing during which the board received testimony from many groups calling on the FDA to ban BPA from food and beverage containers. The FDA seemed poised to act on that information. But in October, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced it would spend $30 million on a new round of BPA studies.
Granted, it would be silly for one government agency to make a steadfast decision on the BPA issue while another government agency is throwing millions of dollars into researching it. But doesn't the FDA have enough information right now to at least update its previous position (declaring BPA as completely safe?) At the very least, it would be helpful if the FDA declared a date by which they will officially announce their BPA position. Because without a doubt, by the time the NIH is nearing its study completion, there will be other studies just beginning ... just how long will the FDA wait?
What do you think? Should the FDA act now on BPA or wait several months (or even years) for more data to support their position?
Photo: marcelo varsiana
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those
providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of
MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies
with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy
of any of their information.
 WorldShares
lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20
points now.Learn More Earn Points
|
Twitter
Stumble
Digg
Share
CLOSE
link:
link:
| Previous Post Kids' bling loaded with lead | Next Post High hopes for 2010 |
Comments
Roger Williams
12/29/2009 16:23 PM
"Mr. Williams sounds exactly like a representative of the chemical industry or the CATO institues."
Well, I have absolutely nothing to do with the chemical industry. As for being a Cato-ist, I voted for Barack Obama. There is nothing wrong with the "precautionary principle". And I am not cavalier about man-made substances coarsing through my blood system.
I just think some reporters are really just activists in disguise, not professional journalists and that many career.... More
Roger Williams
12/28/2009 18:53 PM
"But doesn't the FDA have enough information right now to at least update its previous position (declaring BPA as completely safe?)"
FDA's previous position was that BPA poses no threat to anybody, except maybe to the fetus in the womb and young infants, but that needs more study to determine. FDA's position is basically supported by every regulatory institution in the world (yes, including Canada). The problem isn't BPA, it's very bad reporters and sleazy politicians who want to pander.... More
Wallace LeStourgeon
12/29/2009 13:42 PM
Mr. Williams sounds exactly like a representative of the chemical industry or the CATO institues. What the general puplic does not know is that our own hormone, estrogen, testosterone, corticosteroids are active in our body in the ppb (parts per billion range). If BPA were the only endocrine distupter perhaps it would not be a problem but the chemical industry never wants to talk about all the other chemicals with similar activities in the body. They also never want to talk about the fact.... More
