Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Monday, May 20, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › MNN BLOGGERS
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
FDA delays acting on BPA
The FDA will wait on new research before acting on BPA.
Mon, Dec 28 2009 at 2:00 PM
 3

Related Topics:

BPA
It was supposed to be here by the end of November, but now it looks like it may be months or even years before the FDA officially offers its updated position on BPA, or bisphenol A. The agency is apparently waiting to see the results of a host of new government-funded studies before taking a stance on the contentious issue of banning BPA from products designed for children.
 
The results from some of the studies will be available in a few months; others will take years. It's unclear exactly how long the agency will postpone its decision.  
 
The FDA has been presented with a number of studies in support of a BPA ban, including animal studies showing that large doses of BPA can cause abnormal sexual development. However, there is bitter disagreement among scientists about the risk posed by the small doses most people are exposed to.
 
This FDA delay is unexpected for those who have been watching and waiting for the agency to make a decision. In June, the FDA's new chief, Margaret Hamburg, promised that the agency would reconsider its earlier conclusion that BPA is safe. A few months later, the FDA's Science Advisory Board held a public hearing during which the board received testimony from many groups calling on the FDA to ban BPA from food and beverage containers. The FDA seemed poised to act on that information. But in October, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced it would spend $30 million on a new round of BPA studies. 
 
Granted, it would be silly for one government agency to make a steadfast decision on the BPA issue while another government agency is throwing millions of dollars into researching it. But doesn't the FDA have enough information right now to at least update its previous position (declaring BPA as completely safe?) At the very least, it would be helpful if the FDA declared a date by which they will officially announce their BPA position. Because without a doubt, by the time the NIH is nearing its study completion, there will be other studies just beginning ... just how long will the FDA wait?
 
What do you think? Should the FDA act now on BPA or wait several months (or even years) for more data to support their position?
 
Photo: marcelo varsiana

The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.

Previous Post
Kids' bling loaded with lead
Next Post
High hopes for 2010

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 3
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
Roger Williams Dec 29 2009 at 4:23 PM
"Mr. Williams sounds exactly like a representative of the chemical industry or the CATO institues." Well, I have absolutely nothing to do with the chemical industry. As for being a Cato-ist, I voted for Barack Obama. There is nothing wrong with the "precautionary principle". And I am not cavalier about man-made substances coarsing through my blood system. I just think some reporters are really just activists in disguise, not professional journalists and that many career politicians are simply
.... More
not be trusted. Evidence of that, in my opinion, is the wildly irresponsible remarks and reactions to BPA.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Roger Williams Dec 28 2009 at 6:53 PM
"But doesn't the FDA have enough information right now to at least update its previous position (declaring BPA as completely safe?)" FDA's previous position was that BPA poses no threat to anybody, except maybe to the fetus in the womb and young infants, but that needs more study to determine. FDA's position is basically supported by every regulatory institution in the world (yes, including Canada). The problem isn't BPA, it's very bad reporters and sleazy politicians who want to pander to voters.
.... More
So, no, FDA's decision is not surprising and not a bad one.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Wallace LeStourgeon Dec 29 2009 at 1:42 PM
Mr. Williams sounds exactly like a representative of the chemical industry or the CATO institues. What the general puplic does not know is that our own hormone, estrogen, testosterone, corticosteroids are active in our body in the ppb (parts per billion range). If BPA were the only endocrine distupter perhaps it would not be a problem but the chemical industry never wants to talk about all the other chemicals with similar activities in the body. They also never want to talk about the fact that
.... More
today 45% of all males will be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime (the NCI SEER database) and they continue to argue that environmental chemicals are safe. It is clear that the only people who take a cavalier attitude about these matters are those who stand to profit by its use. What is wrong with the European "precautionary rule"? It has kept atrazine and pthalates and certain brominated flame retardents out of their bodies.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

EDITORS' PICKS

tease painting

line

tease devil's kettle

line

tease calories

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. What causes tornadoes?
  2. How space tourism could help save planet Earth
  3. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  4. Military dog comes home from Iraq traumatized
  5. The 9 nastiest things in your supermarket
  6. New psychiatric manual stirs controversy
  7. How to get rid of stink bugs
  8. 5 life lessons learned by working at McDonald's
  9. 15 houseplants to improve indoor air quality
  10. When is tornado season?
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered

ABOUT Jenn Savedge

Green parenting author on raising eco-friendly kids.

More about Jenn RSS feed

Recent Posts

  • New book will keep your kids busy this summer (and all year long)
  • Colorado adopts shelter dogs and cats as new 'state pet'
  • Pregnant women living in greener areas have bigger babies
+ Add this to my site
Advertisement
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS