SPECIAL FEATURES:
Email
Make your dog more hybrid, less SUV
Don't let those puppy dog eyes get blamed for climate change. Instead, put your pooch on the fast track to a lower eco-pawprint.
Thu, Mar 11 2010 at 9:53 AM
Related Topics:
Photo: Jupiterimages
If you’re a dog owner and call yourself eco-conscious, guilt might set in after reading the book "Time to Eat the Dog? The Real Guide to Sustainable Living" by Robert and Brenda Vale, which reveals dogs are worse for the environment than SUVs.
The authors, who designed the first sustainable settlement in the United Kingdom in 1996 and are architecture professors at Victory University of Wellington in New Zealand, measured the environmental impact of our lifestyles from the food we eat to how we travel to sports, hobbies and pets based on the Ecological Footprint technique created by Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees.
Bottom line: Our pooches cost the Earth more than a Toyota Land Cruiser. According to the Vales’ research, a medium-sized dog has twice the impact of driving the luxury SUV 10,000 miles. Why? “Basically dogs are bad for the environment because they are large carnivores, so it takes a lot of land to provide their foods,” says Robert Vale. Luckily, there are a few things you can do to get Fido out of the proverbial doghouse.
Put your dog on a diet
Since your canine’s carnivorous diet is the biggest factor in his environmental impact, start by looking at what goes in the dog bowl. Most dog food isn’t produced in an eco-friendly way, and the heavy bags of kibble or cans of wet food have to travel miles to get to your door.
Dr. Viv Harris, veterinarian and author of "Natural Remedies Dogs and Cats Wish You Knew: A Holistic Care Guide," suggests making your own dog food using locally grown or organic veggies. Your vet can help you work out the perfect mix of proteins, carbohydrates, fats, minerals and vitamins to meet your dog’s needs. And with all of the tainted pet food scandals in recent years, your dog may be better off eating homemade meals anyway. After all, many dog foods that claim to be natural still contain byproducts or low-grade meats.
If the do-it-yourself doggie diet sounds like too much work, look for smaller, locally made dog food brands. Or select chicken or rabbit based-kibble, which have a lower impact than beef.
Do your doodie duty
If you ask the Vales, dog poo isn’t such a big deal compared to what goes in the other end. However, if you don’t scoop up the poop, it can contaminate our waterways. If you’re a city dweller and use plastic bags to clean up, choose biodegradable poop bags.
Shop smart
Just like when you shop for yourself, think about the impact of the products you buy for your pets. Choose dog shampoos that are free of sodium lauryl sulfate. For toys and dog beds, avoid plastic and synthetic products and look to natural fibers like organic cotton or hemp as well as products made from recycled goods. We love SimplyFido’s hemp plush collection, West Paw’s Eco Nap dog bed made from recycled plastic bottles, and Planet Dog’s balls made from post-production material that would otherwise be discarded.
Use birth control
Spaying and neutering your dog might sound inhumane, but it’s the eco-conscious thing to do. “Reducing the overpopulation of dogs is crucial,” Harris says. If your dog alone creates a impact bigger than an SUV, just think what its accidental litter of puppies could do!
Choose safe flea and tick treatments
According to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), some flea control products pose a cancer risk to children up to 1,000 times higher than the Environmental Protection Agency’s acceptable limits. Keep these chemicals off little fingers and your pet’s fur by talking to your vet about safer treatments or by choosing from the NRDC’s list of safer flea control choices.
You can also make natural solutions at home. In her book, Harris suggests creating a DIY flea wash. Start with a base of castile soap and add 10 drops of lavender, five drops of eucalyptus, five drops of rosemary and five drops of cajuput oil.
Consider other pets
We’re not suggesting you part ways with your pooch right now, but if you don’t have a dog yet or are considering a second pet, you might want to think outside the dog box. According to the Vales, a goldfish is equal to the impact of just two cell phones; two hamsters or four canaries can be compared to a plasma TV; and a cat is only as bad as a Smart Car. Even smaller dogs are better than big dogs.
Change your own habits
Just like you can buy carbon credits when you take a long-haul flight, you can try to balance out your dog’s impact by making some changes of your own. If you don’t want to give up Fido, maybe you should give up meat or your car instead. Of course, smaller changes or buying carbon credits can help, too.
You might also like:
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
EDITORS' PICKS
Advertisement
TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON
- Student science experiment finds plants won't grow near Wi-Fi router
- Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
- U.S. solider and stray cat save each other in Afghanistan
- 10 false facts most people think are true
- Archaeologists unearth 5,000-year-old 'third-gender' caveman
- Tornado survivor finds dog during live TV interview
- World's oldest beehive discovered in ancient church
- 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
- 9 habits that may do more harm than good
- Why you should not plant bamboo in your yard
NEWSLETTER
Advertisement
This is by far the most insane thing I have ever read! How about these people reduce there carbon impact by finding some hole to go live I had never heard of this site before and I now plan to never visit again and encourage any and all I know to do the same since they allowed something like this to be published!!!! Please join me if you agree.
This article brings up a really important issue: the effects our pets have on the environment. Cats and dogs eat meats and grains, corn mostly. The way most of our food is grown now, meats and grains require water (and lots of it), petroleum products (e.g. gas and fertilizers), pesticides, and lots and lots of land. There are so many pets across this land that they have a substantial positive impact on our ecological footprints. Hate the message but don't hate the messenger.
1. yes, you are correct; the earth has been heating and cooling for its entire existance. granted, the recent heating has been much more extreme than in the past, but that isn't the point. the point (points rather) are these:
1. When you insult the people you try to "educate", no one will listen to you.
2. this article doesn't have jack to do with global warming; the environmental issues they're discussing have to do with consumption of resources, not heating of global climate.
1. yes, you are correct; the earth has been heating and cooling for its entire existance. granted, the recent heating has been much more extreme than in the past, but that isn't the point. the point (points rather) are these:
1. When you insult the people you try to "educate", no one will listen to you.
2. this article doesn't have jack to do with global warming; the environmental issues they're discussing have to do with consumption of resources, not heating of global climate.
This is probably the most insane thing I have ever read. Apparently you have never had the love of one of the most precious animals on earth. I feel sorry for you.
This has nothing to do with whether the author "likes" dogs or how "precious" they are. He made some good points but you obviously can't hear reason if it disagrees with what you want to believe
Kids have WAY bigger carbon footprints than dogs. I choose to help alive dogs over not yet conceived children...Boooo children!
It says the authors are "architecture professors". So how about you stick with talking about buildings and leave the dogs to the people who know dogs.
Mr. Lynch I totally agree with you. In fact, I think you should stick to talking about things that don't really matter much and leave the important thinking to the people who think.
Pages