The continued fight to label GM food
A possible measure on the California ballot this November brings hope that soon we'll see labels on genetically modified foods.
Thu, Mar 15 2012 at 3:55 PM
CORN: One of the big GM crops. (Photo: Peter Blanchard/Flickr )
I have long been concerned about the high prevalence of genetically modified or GM food in our food supply. For someone who avoids food grown with herbicides and pesticides, the idea of changing the genes in a plant so that it produces pesticides on their own, just doesn't seem like a good way to go.
A coalition of farms and NGOs are working to get a measure on the November ballot that would require the labeling of GM foods in California. In the past, those in the food industry have fiercely opposed similar ballots. It is not surprising, because as soon as GM food are labeled on products in the store, sales may plummet for brands whose products contain GM ingredients. Organic sales might be expected to rise.
This measure in California could be the start of a good thing. One of the campaign's slogans is, "It's our right to know." I think that sums it up beautifully. If you don't think that GM foods are a problem, you have complete freedom to buy GM-labeled foods. The point is this; we have the right to know what is in our food.
Food companies and the large farms that grow GM crops are more concerned about keeping their business afloat than the individual impact GM foods could have on our health. They have an invested interest in keeping consumers in the dark about which products contain GM foods. It is a pitiful example of our democracy that such a high number of Americans support the labeling of GM foods, yet it's not a reality — yet.
I am hopeful that the groups are able to get this measure on the ballot, and I am hopeful that if it passes, it will create a chain reaction with other states eventually passing similar measures.
It is time for Americans to make their opinions heard.
Want to know more about this topic? Read on:
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.