If you go to www.traitorjoe.com right now, you’ll see the Greenpeace website claiming victory. On March 23, Trader Joe’s announced that all of its seafood purchases will shift to sustainable sources by Dec. 31, 2012.
Lifestyle blogger Siel told us last year that after scoring badly for two years in a row on Greenpeace’s seafood sustainability scorecard, the environmental activist organization created the Traitor Joe’s website to protest Trader Joe’s seafood choices.
Trader Joe’s doesn’t mention Greenpeace’s efforts in its announcement. It says the decision was made based on customer feedback and their “efforts to offer seafood options that fit customer needs ranging from food safety and taste, to concern over the environment.”
In addition to claiming victory on the website, Greenpeace released a press release.
“We applaud Trader Joe’s commitment to creating a strong sustainable seafood policy. We are particularly happy to see Trader Joe’s acknowledge that we need marine reserves, and that species like orange roughy and Chilean sea bass are incompatible with a sustainable seafood operation. We know their customers will appreciate their recent statement of intent. After all, seafood consumers deserve access to transparent, accurate information about the products they choose,” said Senior Markets Campaigner Casson Trenor.
- Work with third-party, science-based organizations to establish definitions and parameters for addressing customer concerns about overfishing, destructive catch or production methods, and the importance of marine reserves.
- Remove “red-listed” seafood from their shelves. Trader Joe’s stopped selling Chilean sea bass in 2005, orange roughy in July of 2009, and red snapper in March of 2010.
- Provide accurate information on all seafood labels, including species’ Latin names, origin and catch or production method.
- Use their buying power to leverage change in the seafood industry.
So like Greenpeace, I applaud Trader Joe’s.
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.