There's no arguing that Google has assembled some of the brightest people on the planet at their Mountain View headquarters. And as they continually seem to climb one engineering mountain after another, the scope and breadth of their work expands.
It was certain that with the convergence of electrons and information technology known as the 'Smart Grid,' Google would have some role to play in our energy future. But no one realized just how seriously Google was taking the energy sector until their recent launch of RE through Google.org, a Google spinoff which "... aspires to use the power of information and technology to address the global challenges of our age."
So when they say they've got a formula for a renewable energy future, even one as simple as RE
In their introduction to RE
And they are putting their money behind it. As they explain:
Despite Google's heavy investment in solar technology, solar energy plays a more modest role than expected (about 250 GW) while wind and geothermal grow more rapidly to 380 GW and 80 GW respectively.
The biggest piece of the clean energy pie goes to energy efficiency technologies which account for roughly 400 GW in saved energy by 2030.
One noticeable omission in the proposal that made me particularly happy, on the heels of my story about the false promise of carbon capture, was coal with carbon sequestration (known as CCS). Google did not consider CCS due to the enormous technical challenges that would need to be overcome both in capturing and then burying the carbon.
The Clean Energy 2030 report also dives into the conversion of our transportation fleet to renewable fuels.
So if you want to know what the smartest people on the planet are thinking about our renewable energy future, I highly recommend reading through the report. Somehow hearing it from Google, whose track record proves that achieving the impossible is, well entirely possible, adds a level of reality and executability to what for so long has been merely hypothetical.
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.