It sounds silly for most of us trained to dismiss the rants of the ultra-right-wing blogosphere, but Google is not so dismissive. The sheer number of cross-linked anti-Greenpeace blogs far surpasses the handful of pro-environment, pro-Greenpeace blogs.
Within a couple of days of publishing a post by an angry activist arrested for civil disobedience against CO2 polluters in India, Daily Kos reports that Google search results for key phrases in the post were nearly totally dominated by anti-climate "bloggers" who, acting as one highly trained army, beat one consistent false message into the ground — that Greenpeace is advocating violence.
Everyone familiar with the history of propaganda knows that the one who is able to repeat his message more wins — if that message is true or false. And truth be told, those on the side of truth are generally LESS motivated to bleat their message ad nauseam because, well, they are telling the truth and the truth SHOULD speak for itself.
But is doesn't. It never has, and it never will, and if anything the Internet has made the potential for false propaganda to be disseminated more broadly, more quickly, as evidenced by the reaction to the latest Greenpeace vids.
In response writer Brian Fitsgerald had this to say, and truer words were never spoken:
Rosa Parks was not a terrorist. Gandhi was not a terrorist. Law is made when law is broken, and truly big change seldom happens from within the system. Somebody has to throw the tea overboard to get things moving.
Similarly, the REAL climategate is not about scientists attempting to cover up data (a claim which now six months later has been completely disproved) but about corporations funding disinformation about climate science.
In this topsy-turvy world we now find ourselves in, we should be thankful that organizations like Greenpeace are here to keep it real. Here's their latest video, which debuts a cool and appropriately edgy look for one organization that will never stop rocking the boat, no matter how hot it gets:
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.