• Welcome
  • Community
  • Blogs
  • Photos
  • Join
  • Log in
Follow MNN    
MNN - Mother Nature Network - Envrionmental News
improve your world
Thursday, February 9, 2012
  • Earth Matters

    Browse All » Animals Weather Energy Politics Space Translating Uncle Sam Wilderness & Resources

  • Health

    Browse All » Allergies Fitness & Well-Being Healthy Spaces

  • Lifestyle

    Browse All » Arts & Culture Travel Natural Beauty & Fashion Recycling Responsible Living

  • GREEN TECH

    Browse All » Computers Gadgets & Electronics Research & Innovations Transportation

  • Eco-Biz & Money

    Browse All » Green Workplace Personal Finance Sustainable Business Practices

  • Food & Drink

    Browse All » Beverages Healthy Eating Recipes

  • Your Home

    Browse All » At Home Organic Farming & Gardening Remodeling & Design

  • family

    Browse All » Babies & Pregnancy Family Activities Pets Protection & Safety

Tweet
Pin It
Email Bookmark and ShareShare
WorldShares lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20 points now.
Learn More

Earn Points
What's this?
MNN.COM›

MNN BLOGGERS

Karl Burkart

Why Google could actually kill Facebook

With rumors flying about Google's much-anticipated Facebook killer, many speculate if the company can pull it off. It can, and here's why.

Thu, Jul 01 2010 at 2:25 PM EST
 12

Logo mashup Image: Mashup by Karl Burkart
Ever since Digg founder Kevin Rose spilled the beans on Twitter about Google's soon-to-arrive Facebook-killer (how many social media brands can you fit in one sentence!) the internets have been abuzz with speculation as to whether they can actually pull it off.
 
Facebook's growth seems unstoppable, topping nearly half a billion users, but the social networking behemoth is facing a growing tide of trouble. It has been assaulted recently for its overly liberal privacy settings, causing a wave of people to quit the network. Moreover, Facebook has been strangely aggressive as of late towards certain groups like Boycott BP, which was mysteriously taken down yesterday. (It was later restored.)
 
This has prompted a slew of startup contenders like Diaspora that want to make a totally user-controlled peer-to-peer network that would put the power of privacy directly in the hands of the individual user. 
 
Most doubt that any company, save Google, could actually take on Facebook, but everyone still wonders whether Google's arsenal of funds and its army of genius-IQ engineers are sufficient to stop the Facebook tide before it takes over the world (except of course India and Brazil where Google's Orkut social network is the dominant player).
 
This is a HOW question. There's no doubt that Google could come up with something awesome, but will it be awesome ENOUGH to get people to leave Facebook? My sincere hope is that Google is asking the WHY question, not the HOW question — WHY would anyone want to leave Facebook? It turns out there are two major reasons why people would indeed move to greener pastures, and if Google can exploit Facebook's exposed dual Achilles heels, I believe they will succeed.
 
Facebook's biggest problem stems from a poorly strategized development path. Because it has grown so fast and because so much of its product development effort has focused on opening up the social graph to third-party app developers, the company missed something very, very important ... the user experience. Businesses adore Facebook for its nifty advertising tools and easy access to consumer data, but that has come at a high price ... the alienation of Facebook users.
 
 
1. Concentric rings of privacy
The greatest weakness for Google to exploit is Facebook's total disregard of the user's need to segment their "friends." Facebook currently offers only three levels of privacy — stuff only your friends see, stuff friends of friends can see, and stuff all Facebook users can see. The list tool allows you to create private subsets of your friends, but it is far from intuitive and used by few Facebook members.
 
How many job terminations have resulted from someone in the HR department seeing a little too much from last night's party? Facebook horror stories are endemic of the network's failure to streamline the process of creating basic privacy levels. To be truly useful, the online social network of the future NEEDS to be modeled on natural social behavior. We all stand at the center of a series of "concentric rings" of privacy. All acquaintances are not "friends" and all friends are not "confidants."
 
Each person's inner circle may include just two or three people. The next level out may be 10-20 including family and good friends. In the outer ring ... we may have hundreds of acquaintances that we like and want to include in our lives without giving them access to the inner circles. This data needs to be attributed at the friend level (i.e. when you accept a friend you assign them to a certain privacy level). So our "best friends" automatically get to see everything. While our acquaintances, unbeknownst to them, are blocked from seeing certain images not meant for broader consumption.
 
At least three more rings need to be added to the "friends" zone:
 
 
This sounds simple, but it represents an enormous technological challenge. A whole new set of data needs to be assigned each time the user uploads a picture or wall post. From the user perspective it would look simple — nothing more than a checkbox — but that interface is something that few companies besides Google could tackle.
 
2. Publishing power
If you are like me and you regularly attempt to publish video or article links, you will have grown INCREDIBLY frustrated with Facebook's clunky publishing interface. Literally 30 percent of the time (I tracked it), I am unable to successfully publish a link that shows the thumbnail or video embed. It's a strange bug that I know Facebook is aware of, yet there has never been a permanent fix for it.
 
But that's a small problem compared to Facebook's inability to support the user in personalizing his self-presentation. Facebook is just not cool. That plain grey-blue palette works great for professional and collegiate matters, but if you are a band, artist, poet, or the creator of any sort of media that might garner a following, you're out of luck (unless you can afford a huge media buy). Nobody wants to see the return of those god-awful Myspace backgrounds with sunsets and unicorns, but a little customization would enable the user to take pride in the page as a work of self-expression, rather than an archive of things that happened.
 
Myspace, for all its flaws, was pretty good at fulfilling this need. They had decent tools to message and update your fans, you could customize the look of your page and decide what you wanted to feature, and you could promote a wide variety of media types specifically tailored to your followers.
 
What's astonishing is that for close to a year, Myspace just stared like a deer in Facebook's headlights as clunky, plain Jane Facebook siphoned off nearly all of its U.S. members. The innovation that allowed Facebook to vie for creatives (like bands and artists) was called "the Fan Page." Without it, individuals and brands with loyal followings would never have migrated to Facebook.
 
Facebook's recent decision to get rid of the Fan Page, an act that essentially discourages fan-based networks is almost as mysterious as Myspace's total inaction when it came to enhancing the platform to better serve its fan-based networks. It's now the "Like page" (for lack of a better term) and it has few of the features actually required by artists to properly communicate with "fans." All a page admin can do is send updates, and the updates have now been removed from the recipient's home page (you actually have to click into your inbox and then click the "Updates" folder inside) making updates all but meaningless. Facebook should allow more direct and personal communications between individuals and fan groups within the broader social network:
 
 
To sum up, there is a enormous unmet need right now for a social networking platform that provides powerful publishing tools for its most influential members — bands, artists, creatives — AND that allows segmentation of a user's circle of friends. If Google play its cards right, the social network of the future could be there for the taking.
 
Follow Karl Burkart on Twitter @greendig or Facebook /greendig or RSS.
CLOSE link:
Previous Post
Mac and PC share a dirty secret
   Next Post
White House honors environmental high school in L.A.
You might also like:
Related Topics: Facebook, Green Alternatives, Social Responsibility

Comments

Follow this conversation
Add your comment
View:
  • All (12)

anonymous
Gup 02/22/2011 09:09 AM

They are not for real. Just a nerd trying to make a name. They offer nothing and I tried it, and they send me friends everyday to contact. now I am being a ban for harassing. when i pleaded my case they refused to listen. so why are you sending me people to contact to make friends, and what is the purpose of your site? if not to meet NEW people and make friends, Daaaaaaaaa

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Joni Today 13:32 PM

Hey, it's like this. If you aren't proud of it, don't do it, and certaintly don't do it on a public forum such as myspace, facebook or twitter. You want your privacy stay off the internet. Either way, big brother is here and there. If you've done nothing wrong, or nothing to be ashamed of then you have nothing to fear in that arena.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
josh 07/12/2010 13:00 PM

but its not really that easy. other people can take pictures of things you have done and then tag you, so everyone sees it. sure, you can remove the tag - but if sometimes other people will see it before you get that chance.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Jeff K. 07/06/2010 18:34 PM

Google is HUGE and pretty much can do whatever they want. After all they have the best platform to advertise it on, Google.

Thanks,
Jeff K.
A Used Macbook Enthusiast

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
C Weese 07/06/2010 16:26 PM

Thanks for (finally) a thoughtful article on the pitfalls of FB, rather than an over-hyped "what's next!". I use lists to segregate my FB "friends" into family/real friends and acquaintances/work related people. I use the segregation mostly for things like family photos - no one but family needs to see those. And I assume anything that I type (ie, status updates) has been released to the wild, therefore I should probably make sure it's more or less kosher.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Not Peranoid 07/03/2010 23:48 PM

You guys sound like a bunch of paranoid crazies, yea facebook sucks in certain ways, but it isnt the end of the world. Actually i like allot of the myspace features better, but they had to much hack code involved.

My space in many wasy was as much of a piece of crap as facebook, except facebook you can actually read stuff with out annoying flashing banner bling bling and stupid backgrounds that took forever to download, LOL

Big brother doesnt give a S*** about you except if your doing.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
@amsterdamant 07/03/2010 10:35 AM

And that is even better than new 'segments' I think (although it Is a f*ing lot of work).

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Brian 07/02/2010 20:58 PM

Any company that stands up to tyrannical regimes such as the chinese communist party even when they are sure to lose financially gets my backing!

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
hansragnar 07/01/2010 23:40 PM

as in what was the need for hulahoops ? pet rocks ? what you're missing is that no one needs facebook - except marketing types... it does nothing for me.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Lorrie Mason 07/01/2010 15:18 PM

Its not like anybody has forced me into Facebook but my frustration grows daily with all of the quirks and problems and lack of help (it was difficult to even find a place to ask for help). so Im happy to see this.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ken O'Shaughnessy 07/01/2010 15:13 PM

I think Google can do even better than concentric rings for sorting friends and acquaintances - they already have a proven label system in Gmail & Docs that allows you to assign more than one label to a single item. This would allow a person to receive only posts designated as available to that label or set of labels that they intended.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Lynn` 07/01/2010 14:44 PM

Thanks for this.. I really do hope Google comes up with something.. because I dread logging into FB these days.. for fear that my privacy will be completely shattered and destroyed. "Big brother is watching" has never felt more real since the changes FB made within the last 6mos.. it is truly discouraging.

Anyhow, like I said.. thanks for your blog and info.. ^_^

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

Add your comment

Sign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below.
    Log in or
    create an account
     
    Login
Used only for emailed comments and will not be displayed with your post
Notify me with an email when other people comment on this article.
The posting of advertisement, profanity or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our Terms of Use
THURSDAY'S BEST BETS

       tease to ecollywood

       tease to squatter

       tease to toxic plants for cats

ADVERTISEMENT

TOP MEMBERSJoin Now
  • poland.jr
    21026 points
  • ecomainegirl
    9359 points
  • achase
    9317 points
  • LauraB
    5049 points
  • Momof2
    4502 points
All members

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

CONNECT WITH MNN

Follow @twitterapi
 Tumblr
 Google +

ADVERTISEMENT



Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Advisory Board
  • Editors' Blog
  • Press
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Service
  • WorldShares

MNN Tools

  • Advice
  • Blogs
  • Day in History
  • Eco-glossary
  • Infographics
  • Lists
  • Photos
  • Videos

Connect

  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Contests
  • Idea Lab
  • Mixed Greens
  • Newsletters
  • Polls
  • RSS

Channels

  • Earth Matters
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Green Tech
  • Eco-Biz & Money
  • Your Home
  • Family
  • State Reports
 

Copyright © 2012 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE
 
SPONSORS