Scientific methodology requires publishing what the researcher starts with, what he does with it, the results, and his conclusions. The AGW crowd only publish the last two. It's not science unless they publish all four, where people they hate can take a look at it. The science will defend it's self if it is done right. If they don't publish the proof, their claims are not supported, and are not science. Don't like it? Tough. That's the way science works.

why is the hadley center cherry picking the russian temperature data to bias towards urban areas at the expense of rural ones? The Moscow Institute of Economic Analysis alleges. There seems to be a widespread pattern of messing unscientifically withdata and not make that data freely available . How do I answer this one ?

The dawn of the Electric Monk
Douglas Adams, Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency

"Thanks to an Australian solar physicist by the name of John Cook, you can access those skeptics' arguments, and the science-based counter-arguments, on your iPhone."

So is it a really well cross referenced Bible, where you can take any statement, find a quick quote about the statement and read it to the scientist and convert them to the wisdom of your Good Book?

You have become.... More