Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Saturday, May 25, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › MNN BLOGGERS
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
Mitsubishi's LaserVue TV delivers big energy savings
Mon, Dec 08 2008 at 11:37 PM
 5

Related Topics:

Energy Efficiency

Photo: Mitsubishi Electric

It wasn't too long ago when the refrigerator held the heavyweight title for biggest home energy hog, accounting for more than 13% of total electricity usage.  Thanks to the EnergyStar program, appliance manufacturers were driven to make refrigerators more and more efficient.  But a new contender has arrived, one which could far eclipse the refrigerator in terms of energy consumption -- the big screen plasma.

Every year, the plasmas grow in size and resolution and drop in cost, making that coveted 60" high-def screen both more desirable and attainable.  But a 60" plasma can devour up to 540 watts/hr or more, surpassing the energy use of a standard refrigerator. (Note: plasma TV's have been making great strides in energy efficiency and some 50" 2009 models are as low as 300 watts.  Check out the great CNET comparison chart).

Doing the math

Nielson reports that the average American watches 142 hours of television per month x 12 months. At 540 watts that is a whopping 920 kWh per year. And that's just when the television is on.  Most televisions continue to burn energy while off.  This is called its "phantom load," and it accounts for an additional 3.7 kWh (at an estimated 0.5 watts/hr x 20 hours of 'off' time).  Your total for the year?  Having that 60" plasma will require 957 924 kWh and cost the average American about $111 (at 12 cents/kWh).  

This is one reason why the US Dept. of Energy (DOE) recently issued a staggering report that projected home electronics usage would double by 2025 (3.5% every year).  The energy required to power our TV's will go from the current 33 billion kWh to 66 billion kWh.  That will require about 10 new power plants and will produce 23.1 million tons of CO2 just for our TV's!

Fortunately, there is a solution to our high-def environmental woes.  And it will deliver a visual experience that will far surpass even the fanciest plasma TV's.  It is called Laser TV.

Eye-popping color

I had the chance to see the LaserVue on display recently, and as I passed by I saw a crowd of people just standing still and staring, mouths slightly open in a hypnotic trance. I turned to see what they were all looking at, and there it was.  More like a mirage than a television image.  The Mitsubishi demo featured tropical fish swimming underwater, and I am not exaggerating when I say that I literally felt like I could reach out and touch the fish.  The color was so real, and the motion so fluid, that my mind instantly forgot I was looking at an electronic device.

What explains this remarkable image quality?  Because Mitsubishi dispenses with the use of phosphors (used in the plasmas) or filters (used in LCD's).  Ever since the birth of the TV, we have been tied to these technologies which transmute white light into other colors by passing the light through a medium. Though we have continually improved TV's, the best TV manufacturer's have still only ben able to achieve about 50% of full color range (what we now call hi-def).

But in the Mitsubishi screen, the light is delivered directly by an array of lasers, and so the colors are real, not "translated," delivering the full color range perceivable to the human eye.  For this same reason the clarity of the image is preserved even during rapid movement.  The LaserVue is also 3d enabled, so when 3d media production hits its prime, this technology will be able to deliver a completely realistic 3d image.  

Good news for environmentalists

And the best news is that all this color is delivered at about 1/4 the energy use of a 60" typical hi-def plasma. Instead of that 934 kWh's per year, we're now talking about a much more modest 230 kWh's per year, which beats even a basic 36" TV.  This seems to be the recurring theme. Ultimately being green is not about giving up something, but about inventing a way to do it even better.  We are only limited by the design problems we set forth for ourselves, and in this case Mitsubishi has proved the point.

 

 

The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.

Previous Post
Hyundai introduces revolutionary gel batteries
Next Post
Jetta wins green car of the year

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 5
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
karl-burkart's picture
Karl Burkart Jan 16 2009 at 2:01 AM
In response to below...Well no, the calcs are not inaccurate or wrong. But I agree they may be inadvertently misleading and I also did not mean in any way to target plasma specifically, as LCD TV's can be just as bad if not worse. So let me make some clarifications, and to your point a struck the word "typical" which is I think the source of confusion. This was a case study based on a 60" hi-def plasma. If you click on CNET's comparison chart of top models (http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6475_7-6400401
.... More
-3.html ) you will see that there are only a few 60" TV's listed like the VIZIO VM60PHDTV and the Panasonic TH 58PZ700 which both use between 520-560 watts/hr. I was using these trying to compare apples to apples -- Mitsubishi claims to have a 60" which has the energy efficiency of a much smaller plasma. There are plenty of wonderful plasmas at 40" and 50" and smaller which as you said use 250 watts or less. I added the note and link above in the post so everyone can compare for themselves. And now that you mentioned it, I think its a good idea to do a post-CES showcase of the best-performing hi-def EnergyStar TV's. So look for that in the near future. There are about 3 new 60" plasmas that are in the 350-375 watt range like the LG 60PG30FC-UA, which is a dramatic improvement. Still doesn't compare to to Mitsubishi though.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Jan 15 2009 at 9:42 AM
You plasma energy comments and statements are misleading, innaccurate and simply wrong! Plasma manufacturers have made tremendous progress in reducing energy consumption while improving industry leading performance and picture quality. Just this year, 2008 models are 20% more efficient than their 2007 models. You must review the Energy Star web site and find all 58/60" plasma HDTV, which are Energy Star compliant, are rated under 375w, NOT 540w, with less than .5% standby power. In fact, plasma is
.... More
now so energy efficient that replacing a Sony 36" CRT using 245w with a 720p Panasonic rated at 155w, for example, will improve energy effeciency by 45%. Standby power in all plasma HDTVs are .5%, NOT 5%. This industry, and all who elect to comment and lead opinion, even the environmental community, have a responsibility to readers to get it right! You owe readers a correction and an apology!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
karl-burkart's picture
Karl Burkart Jan 15 2009 at 1:33 PM
Well no, they are not inaccurate or wrong. But I agree they are inadvertently misleading and I also did not mean in any way to target plasma specifically, as LCD is just as bad if not worse. So let me make some clarifications, and to your point a struck the word "typical" which is confusing. This was a case study based on a 60" hi-def plasma. If you click on CNET's comparison chart of top models (http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6475_7-6400401-3.html ) you will see that there are only a few 60" TV's
.... More
listed like the VIZIO VM60PHDTV and the Panasonic TH 58PZ700 which both use between 520-560 watts/hr. I was using these trying to compare apples to apples -- Mitsubishi claims to have a 60" which has the energy efficiency of a much smaller plasma. There are plenty of wonderful plasmas at 40" and 50" and smaller which as you said use 250 watts or less. I added the note and link above in the post so all can compare for themselves. And now that you mentioned it, now that CES is over I think its a good idea to do a showcase of the best-performing hi-def energyStar TV's. So look for that in the near future. There are about 3 new 60" plasmas that are in the 350-375 watt range like the LG 60PG30FC-UA.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Jan 16 2009 at 3:29 PM
Thank you for attempting to clarify. Your calcs may be accurate, however they are based on 2 year old product information and tested at what appears to be peak power, which is most likely full white screen. CNET did use the EPA power testing standard which simulates normal consumer viewing. No one watches a full white screen. In any event your conclusions are based on old, and faulty information. You mention 'LCD can be just as bad'. My friend, new 2008 models, plasma and LCD, with few exceptions,
.... More
are more energy efficient than those CRTs they will most likely replace! Read my first reply! Two other points: 1. it is unfair to compair a LCD based RPTV to the picture standard, plasma technology...any comparison is not 'apples to apples! 2. your refrigerator comprison therefore is misleading and appears to be a 'sensational' comparison. Refrigerators use 11% of home energy while TV is 3%.! We can disucss this further and I can provide updated and facts! Do you have a #...or you can visit: www. plasmadisplaycoalition.org for facts!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Jan 17 2009 at 12:42 AM

Will definitely cover these new developments.It's amazing how much progress has been made in both plasmas and LCD's in just 2 short years.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

EDITORS' PICKS

tease weird things

line

tease cellars

line

tease fishing

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. Student science experiment finds plants won't grow near Wi-Fi router
  2. The 9 nastiest things in your supermarket
  3. Archaeologists unearth 5,000-year-old 'third-gender' caveman
  4. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  5. 10 false facts most people think are true
  6. Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
  7. 5 mind-bending facts about dreams
  8. Is that snake venomous?
  9. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  10. Are mermaids real?
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor
Making a difference with the click of a mouse: Tech meets philanthropy at Causes.com
Causes.com and AT&T offer Connect for Good, a program that encourages the telecommunications more...
AT&T: Transforming Business
The Distributed Workplace: AT&T Saves Money and Resources with Telecommuting
AT&T minimizes its environmental impact with telecommuting technology, enabling many of its more...
AT&T: Transforming Business
Do One Thing: AT&T employees lead positive change in the community
The 2012 champions of AT&T's Do One Thing - Rethink Possible employee engagement program more...
AT&T: Transforming Business
John Schinter explains AT&T’s three-pronged approach to energy management
John Schinter, AT&T's Director of Energy, explains that one of AT&T's most more...
AT&T: Transforming Business
Water scarcity 101: AT&T explores the relationship between energy and water
AT&T teams up with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) to examine ways to save water in its more...
AT&T: Transforming Business

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS