Texting while walking: Should it be banned?
In the aftermath of the fountain incident, a look at several states trying to make distracted walking illegal.
Photo: Jason Verway/Flickr
link:
//-->
|
Pin It
|
Texting while walking: Should it be banned?In the aftermath of the fountain incident, a look at several states trying to make distracted walking illegal.By John PlattFri, Jan 28 2011 at 10:17 AM EST
12
Photo: Jason Verway/Flickr Will Rogers famously wrote, "You can't legislate intelligence and common sense into people." And yet, in the wake of Cathy Cruz Marrero's now-infamous fall into a fountain while walking and texting, lawmakers in several states want to legislate against similar activity.
Proposed laws in New York and Arkansas would restrict people from "using cell phones and music players such as iPods by people running and walking on the street or sidewalk," according to a report from WFMZ and the Associated Press.
In New York, state Sen. Carl Kruger's proposal would ban pedestrians from using any electronic device while using a crosswalk in a city of more than 1 million residents. If it passes, violators would be subject to a $100 fine. Kruger has been seeking to pass this regulation since 2007.
Arkansas' law is a bit tougher, banning pedestrians, runners and cyclists from wearing headphones in both ears any time they are on, or near, a road or highway. Wearing just a single ear bud would be okay under the proposed law.
Similar pending legislation in Oregon would make it against the law for bicyclists to use cell phones or music players, while a slightly broader bill in Virginia would keep cyclists from using any "hand-held communication device," according to a report from the New York Times.
This movement to legislate distracted walking has a purpose: Pedestrian fatalities are on the rise. According to a report from the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA), pedestrian deaths rose slightly in the first six months of 2010, the first time that has happened in four years. "One of the reasons we think the trend may be turning negatively is because of distracted pedestrians," a GHSA spokesperson told the Times.
Kruger, meanwhile, told the Times that people used to invoke common sense while crossing the street. "We're taught from knee-high to look in both directions, wait, listen and then cross. You can perform none of those functions if you are engaged in some kind of wired activity."
The problem isn't new, nor is it restricted to fatalities. A 2008 ABC News report discussed doctors' concerns about the rising number of injuries from distracted texting. "The more people try to multitask and do so many things at once, the more likely we are to see people with injuries from trying to do too much at once," Dr. Mark Melrose told ABC.
Are consumers taking the threat seriously? Only 632 people have signed an online oath to "be part of the solution" at the website TxtResponsibly.org, which was founded in June 2009 but appears to have been dormant since August 2010.
Still, maybe people will listen to the fountain-dipping Marrero, who told WFMZ "Texting and walking — take it from me, it's dangerous."
Related on MNN: Watch the viral video of Marrero falling into a fountain
MNN homepage photo: TarahDawdy/Flickr
CLOSE
link:
You might also like:
Comments
Madison
03/28/2011 19:23 PM
I don't think that the government should be able to tell us everything that we can and can't do. I get most of the law and why the government made them, but sometimes they can just go to far. They should'nt be able to tell us if we can listen to music or text while walking. That's just going too far. Is'nt this supposed to be a free country?
RD
01/31/2011 10:11 AM
Decisions and laws have to be made by our government because a lot of people have that "look out for No.1" attitude and think their stupid actions in public doesn't harm anyone. Example being, DUI, it's against the law and if we left it up to each individual we would have a lot more deaths than we do (and people still haven't learned). Texting while walking and driving are other prime examples where people feel they are doing no one any harm when in fact these stupid actions do cause deaths and.... More
hippioflov
01/31/2011 09:46 AM
Where does all this making us safe legislation go? Read Rash - a sci-fi book that takes such legislation to its logical and silly extreme. You can read it in a few hours.
Walter
01/30/2011 23:52 PM
Distracted people on cell phones is a good thing. This helps get rid of the people with stupid genetics. There should be a lot more people texting and walking in streets.
Ann Monis
01/30/2011 12:48 PM
I've been texting while walking for years. I have yet to walk into anything, fall or get hit by a car. I learnt how to text and walk. Why should the stupidest people ruin it for the rest of us?
morgan painter
01/30/2011 01:27 AM
Forgive me for being calloused, but I have lost my patience with stupid people. Years ago when people wandered about aimlessly, not watching their surroundings, the saber toothed tigers would pounce and remove them from the gene pool so they could not reproduce. Now, society has formed so much security for them, they are multiplying like rodents. I do feel bad for the lady who fell in the fountain and was embarrassed by having a video placed on the net. She didn't deserve to be made a spectacle.... More
Steve Montgomery
01/29/2011 12:20 PM
The only way to look to cool when working the phone. Also, just pulling into a corner and keeping low-voiced is also as dignified. Let's, at least, try and not LOOK shallow, eh?
Steve Montgomry
01/29/2011 12:16 PM
Emit a 'zombie' when walking past one. They're holding up the concourse with their ambling. Airport zombies tend to frequent the corridors. If you can yell 'zombie' into the phone, it will help.
Serena
01/28/2011 17:24 PM
There is a name for those distracted people that get hurt-survival of the fittest. It is NOT ok for a government to tell us what we are or are not allowed to do while walking/biking/running or doing anything else we want to do. Hurt others on purpose-not ok. Hurting others because we are distracted has nothing to do with the phone and everything to do with decision making by the person. We should not be told how to act and what decisions to make by our government.
NK
01/28/2011 12:56 PM
DT, the person texting, listening to music, and all other forms of electronic distraction are not only putting themselves in danger, they are also putting others in danger.Yes, a single person may fall into a fountain in a mall, but a single person may also walk straight into the path of an oncoming car, the driver of which swerves or slams on brakes to avoid hitting the pedestrian or bicyclist, causing an accident. The proposal is for the protection of everyone.
DT
01/28/2011 11:48 AM
I don't understand why we should protect those in society that chose to allow themselves to be distracted in such a manner that is harmful to themselves. Banning electronic devises isn't the answer. You can't put the blame on electronics but yet the blame should fall to the person using such items. Two people engrossed in conversation can be distracted but we would not seek to ban our friends from talking to us. We must adapt to some reasonable saftey rules. A person who.... More Add your commentSign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below. |
ADVERTISEMENT |
Copyright © 2012 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE |
| SPONSORS |