Face to face with T. Boone Pickens
Pickens: 'If you don't think that you're gonna see a $200 barrel of oil, you're joking.'
Thu, Mar 05 2009 at 5:05 PM EST
10
Images: Pickens Plan It's hard not to like T. Boone Pickens. At 80 years, he could have retired many times over from a multi-billion dollar career in the old and gas industry. But this is a man on a mission, and you could see the fire in his eyes when he got up close and personal during a press meeting this morning in Santa Barbara.
Pickens was put on the hot seat earlier this morning at the Wall Street Journal ECO:nomics summit, answering questions and responding to a general sense of skepticism about the Pickens Plan (40% of attendees polled by digital hand-held devices were against the Plan). In case you are not familiar with the now famous Pickens plan it goes like this...
There currently is no comprehensive plan to wean ourselves form foreign oil. This is a very big problem. At any point, OPEC which now controls about 55% of our oil supply could chose to "flip the switch," forcing the U.S. to pay much higher prices. With rapidly diminishing oil supplies in the U.S. (Pickens endorses Peak Oil theory) our demand for foreign oil will surely rise, resulting in what Boone calls "the fastest transfer of wealth in history," a transfer from North America to the Middle East.
The transference will be further accelerated when Mexico, our 3rd largest source of oil, runs out (their demand is rising dramatically while their supply has dropped from 2.2 to 1.4 billion million in the last 5 years). And Canada's infusion of oil might be troubled by the increasingly controversial Alberta Tar Sands. In the background we have the spectre of explosive demand for oil in China, India and South America.
There is a looming inevitability that belies the current $44 per oil barrel. Like the quiet before a storm, it's only a matter of time before we hit the violent crossroads of demand and supply.
Pickens has a solution, and it's called the Pickens Plan. After spending $56 million marketing the plan, it is gaining traction. Over 1.5 million people have pledged their support online (a fact, according to Pickens, that has finally gained him real access in the political sphere) and just last week he presented the plan to Obama's energy team in Washington.
But Pickens has had major criticisms to overcome from both sides of the political spectrum. On the left the "greenies," as Pickens refers to them, have been reluctantly coming board, though hardly anyone has forgotten his machiavellian support of the anti-Kerry 'Swift Boat' campaign, his under-the-radar acquisition of surface water rights in Texas, or the divisive Prop 10 which he introduced on last year's California ballot.
On the right, Wall Street (and notably the Wall Street Journal) has lambasted Pickens for violating the sacred tenets of the free market.
But Pickens has a response for both. He has deflected blows from the left by creating an alliance with Al Gore (who backs his plan) and by declaring to the dismay of his Texas oil friends, "I buy Global Warming." To his right-wing critics that say he is disrupting the free market, he retorts:
Free market? Who's kidding who? OPEC is not a free market. We’re in a game where we have no cards. If you’re in a game with no cards, get out of the game.
In 1990 the U.S. was importing 40% of its oil. The number has steadily climbed to 67%. With the current trajectory we will be at 75% in a few years, a tipping point which will threaten both our economic and national security. According to Pickens we are seeing early warning signs of an impending crisis. Just two weeks ago, Saudi Arabian oil futures traded higher than West Texas oil for the first time in history. As he repeated today, "We will see a $60 barrel of oil, before we see a $40 barrel... if you don't think you're gonna see a $200 barrel of oil, you're joking."
I believe Pickens is onto something in more ways than one. First off, his framing of the situation, while all but ignoring the rhetoric of global warming, still serves the cause by focusing on the more tangible threats of weakened national security and unpredictability in the oil market.
As has been proven time and again, while Americans largely believe global warming is a threat, few connect to the issue emotionally, and fewer still actually make lifestyle changes based on the perceived threat of climate change. While suddenly shifting gas prices and the idea of Middle Eastern countries theoretically owning the United States is something every American can relate and react to.
And the plan, as a stepping stone to a more sustainable economy based on renewable energy sources, makes a lot of sense. The key of the Pickens Plan is to focus on converting the trucking industry to natural gas. Trucking and shipping in the U.S. accounts for 70% of all oil consumption, and of the 6.6 million 18-wheelers currently in operation, about 340,000 are up for replacement.
If these trucks were replaced with LNG trucks, we could kick-start a natural gas infrastructure for vehicles. His proposed $80,000 per vehicle incentive would offset the additional costs for the trucking industry and result in a skeleton distribution network of 2,000 stations, creating 450,000 jobs, while reducing a vehicle's carbon emissions by 20% and pollutant emissions by 90%. And according to Pickens we have decades of untapped natural gas reserves. A gallon of LNG could sell for as low as $1.50.
Both Al Gore and T. Boone Pickens agree that natural gas is a temporary (and a partial solution). Electric technology might be great for passenger vehicles in the near future, but will likely not provide the power needed for an 18-wheeler. But as electric technology improves in the coming decades, it's possible that wind and other renewable energy sources could power our entire fleet.
In the meantime, natural gas is looking like a step in the right direction.
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those
providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of
MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies
with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy
of any of their information.
 WorldShares
lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20
points now.Learn More Earn Points
|
Twitter
Stumble
Digg
Share
CLOSE
link:
link:
| Previous Post Wall Street Journal to host ECO:nomics summit | Next Post Al Gore weathers confrontation at ECO:nomics summit |
Comments
riyan.jason
07/21/2009 08:55 AM
The transference will be further accelerated when Mexico, our 3rd largest source of oil, runs out secured credit cards (their demand is rising dramatically while their supply has dropped from 2.2 billion barrels per day to 1.4 billion in the last 5 years). And Canada's infusion of oil might be troubled savings account by the increasingly controversial Alberta Tar Sands. In the background we have the spectre of explosive demand for oil in China, India and South America. .... More
Luke S.
04/21/2009 00:59 AM
This plan gives a clear thinking about controlling the main cause of pollution-oil. But is true that there are vehicles that cannot be supported by the new electric cars. Well there must be broader studies about this problem. The economy is like the earth, hungering for help and at the middle of a great storm for survival. .... More
Guest
Today 00:26 AM
I would like to inform you that there is a new technology for oil/gas detection to significant increase of world energy potential and mitigate the economic crisis.
With new exploration technology (patented invention US 7,330,790) you could make up to three times more oil and gas discoveries than when using conventional technology. And the fact that new technology won't need more investments is also very important. It can significantly mitigate world energy problems.
The technology.... More
Guest
Today 10:48 AM
I know Dr. Berg and I know first hand about his technology. reply to me at fnfllc@earthlink.net if you wish to comtact me.
Guest
03/06/2009 20:44 PM
This should be good.
Richard Burton
03/31/2009 23:01 PM
I need to get in touch with Mr. Pickens about my device to help stop green house gases.
Guest
03/06/2009 17:23 PM
More of our shipping must be shifted to trains, railroads must be dramatically developed.
Having lived in Europe, I can say that the US railroad system is third-world class, incredibly antiquated.
Guest
03/06/2009 10:00 AM
When citing Mexico's production, they did produce 2.2 million (instead of billion) barrels per day and now produce 1.4 million (instead of billion) barrels per day.
Guest
03/06/2009 08:42 AM
Global crude oil production peaked in 2008.
The media, governments, world leaders, and public should focus on this issue.
Global crude oil production had been rising briskly until 2004, then plateaued for four years. Because oil producers were extracting at maximum effort to profit from high oil prices, this plateau is a clear indication of Peak Oil.
Then in August and September of 2008 while oil prices were still very high, global crude oil production fell nearly one.... More
