• Welcome
  • Community
  • Blogs
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Join
  • Log in
Follow MNN    
MNN - Mother Nature Network - Envrionmental News
improve your world

 

Sunday, May 27, 2012
  • Earth Matters

    Browse All » Animals Weather Energy Politics Space Translating Uncle Sam Wilderness & Resources

  • Health

    Browse All » Allergies Fitness & Well-Being Healthy Spaces

  • Lifestyle

    Browse All » Arts & Culture Travel Natural Beauty & Fashion Recycling Responsible Living

  • GREEN TECH

    Browse All » Computers Gadgets & Electronics Research & Innovations Transportation

  • Eco-Biz & Money

    Browse All » Green Workplace Personal Finance Sustainable Business Practices

  • Food & Drink

    Browse All » Beverages Healthy Eating Recipes

  • Your Home

    Browse All » At Home Organic Farming & Gardening Remodeling & Design

  • family

    Browse All » Babies & Pregnancy Family Activities Pets Protection & Safety

Tweet
Pin It
Email Bookmark and ShareShare
WorldShares lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20 points now.
Learn More

Earn Points
What's this?
MNN.COM›

MNN BLOGGERS

Karl Burkart

Japanese breakthrough will make wind power cheaper than nuclear

A surprising aerodynamic innovation in wind turbine design called the 'wind lens' could triple the output of a typical wind turbine, making it less costly than nuclear power.

Mon, Aug 29 2011 at 2:47 AM EST
 500

Snapshot from video
NOTE: Some major wind projects like the proposed TWE Carbon Valley project in Wyoming are already pricing in significantly lower than coal power -- $80 per MWh for wind versus $90 per MWh for coal -- and that is without government subsidies using today's wind turbine technology. 
 

Quick Poll

What's your spending philosophy on home improvements?

View results

The International Clean Energy Analysis (ICEA) gateway estimates that the U.S. possesses 2.2 million km2 of high wind potential (Class 3-7 winds) — about 850,000 square miles of land that could yield high levels of wind energy. This makes the U.S. something of a Saudi Arabia for wind energy, ranked third in the world for total wind energy potential.
 
Let's say we developed just 20 percent of those wind resources — 170,000 square miles (440,000 km2) or an area roughly 1/4 the size of Alaska — we could produce a whopping 8.7 billion megawatt hours of electricity each year (based on a theoretical conversion of six 1.5 MW turbines per km2 and an average output of 25 percent. (1.5 MW x 365 days x 24 hrs x 25% = 3,285 MWh's).
 
The United States uses about 26.6 billion MWh's, so at the above rate we could satisfy a full one-third of our total annual energy needs. (Of course, this assumes the concurrent deployment of a nationwide Smart Grid that could store and disburse the variable sources of wind power as needed using a variety of technologies — gas or coal peaking, utility scale storage via batteries or fly-wheels, etc).
 
Now what if a breakthrough came along that potentially tripled the energy output of those turbines? You see where I'm going. We could in theory supply the TOTAL annual energy needs of the U.S. simply by exploiting 20 percent of our available wind resources.
 
Well, such a breakthrough has been made, and it's called the "wind lens." 
 

 
Imagine: no more dirty coal power, no more mining deaths, no more nuclear disasters, no more polluted aquifers as a result of fracking. Our entire society powered by the quiet "woosh" of a wind turbine. Kyushu University's wind lens turbine is one example of the many innovations happening right now that could in the near future make this utopian vision a reality.
 
Yes, it's a heck of a lot of wind turbines (about 2,640,000) but the U.S. with its endless miles of prairie and agricultural land is one of the few nations that could actually deploy such a network of wind turbines without disrupting the current productivity of the land (Russia and China also come to mind). It would also be a win-win for states in the highest wind area — the Midwest — which has been hard hit by the recession. And think of the millions upon millions of jobs that would be created building a 21st century energy distribution system free of the shackles of ever-diminishing fossil fuel supplies. 
 
It's also important to point out that growth in wind power capacity is perfectly symbiotic with projected growth in electric vehicles. EV battery packs can soak up wind power produced during the night, helping to equalize the curve of daytime energy demand. So the controversial investment currently being entertained by President Obama to pipe oil down from the Canadian Tar Sands would — in my utopian vision — be a moot point.
 
It is indeed a lofty vision, but the technology we need is now in our reach. And think of the benefits of having our power production fed by a resource that is both free and unlimited. One downside often cited by advocates of coal and gas power is that wind turbines require a lot more maintenence than a typical coal or gas power plant. But in a lagging economy this might just be wind power's biggest upside — it will create lots and lots of permanent jobs, sparking a new cycle of economic growth in America.
 
Editor's note: Want more info? Karl breaks down the math in his next post.
Previous Post
5 breakthroughs that will make solar power cheaper than coal
   Next Post
How would you spend $7 billion?
You might also like:
Related Topics: Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy, Wind Power, Wind Turbine

Comments

Follow this conversation
Add your comment
View:
  • All (500)

anonymous
mike 05/16/2012 05:13 AM

bye, bye birds

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
praveen kumar 05/05/2012 01:43 AM

wer is the shaft connected?
y the middle part is not connected ?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

Tarrant
Tarrant 05/05/2012 08:16 AM

It appears to me that the inner part runs on a track inside the outer part.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
chrisnoway 05/02/2012 13:21 PM

it would appear that so many comments get a little off track perhaps what we really need is a more responsible consumer attitude about how we consume energy and the products we buy and create that require energy to function ! BLAH,BLAH,BLAH

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
3rdfloor 04/30/2012 04:07 AM

Wake -up ? the saudis are saying they can produce enough solar generated from when and if they do it from their desert in one hour to give the planet enough elec. for a day or year or something like that ... Now think of this all you have to do is put a solar panel grid in outer space ,thats rite ,infact put a bunch of them .How do you get the power back ? change it into the same as your micro way you have in your kitchen you have enough power always even if you turn everthing on an leave.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Frank 04/20/2012 10:26 AM

That windmill LOOKS awesome. But i always thought that the cost to build things like that would always outweigh the money you get in return.

I build a windmill at my house out of a car alternator, it works great, but still not cheaper then just paying for electricity. More pictures here: .... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
nidhin 04/16/2012 12:33 PM

Wind energy is actually quite cool to be honest, but the simple fact is that you only get power when there is wind not when you want power. Well I live in between India's largest windfarm (a total installed capacity of nearly 3000MW), but now during the summer when household electricity consumption is highest, it seems that the wind god's too are enjoying their summer vacations, so not even a single wind turbine seems to be turning when we need them the most.

Whereas if you look at.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
garroty_s_pimp 05/05/2012 21:50 PM

Switch to Solar in the Summer. Then you'll have the best of both --wind power and solar power. Seems like a good marriage of technologies--a hybrid power generator. We've done that here in the States already. So, it's your turn over there in India. Va Pour Sa!

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anon 04/20/2012 22:56 PM

Yeah, but if a windmill breaks, you don't have to evacuate a town and worry about being exposed to dangerous nuclear radiation like you would if a nuclear plant melts down.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Haridas Mandal 04/10/2012 05:56 AM

When we talk about alternate energy we talk about the need of a few percent of people who are anyway guranted electricity for their needs and luxury.
Think of the developing world where almost 85 % of the population is deprived of electric power in their homes.Not that there is not sufficient electricity but a few loves to consume too much for them.
What we therefore need a re-look at the needs of the people.And then make electricity a fundamental right to each and citizen in the.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Barry 04/09/2012 13:07 PM

Sounds feasible, but a disaster for the environment, what about installing solar Panels on every roof of all the houses that exist, ie Electrical companies must replace House Roofs with solar panels with a electrical bill discount to every building concerned instead of covering the country side with wind towers and hundreds of acres of land covered in Solar Panels.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Gordon Truesdale 04/08/2012 11:39 AM

What about the environmental impact on birds and insects? Those prairies are huge migration routes.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 04/29/2012 16:32 PM

Disclaimer: Not an ecologist (evolutionary biologist), so I this is really all I know: I was at a biology conference in January and popped into a session on the ecological impact of wind turbines. Apparently wind farms DO result in mass deaths of birds, bats, and insects-- I was shocked at the numbers. On the flip side, though, many wind farms seem to be willing to work with ecologists to reduce the impact as much as possible (i.e. turning the turbines parallel to migration routes and.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 04/01/2012 19:17 PM

this would be great in every state.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

cesar39nt
cesar39nt 03/28/2012 11:07 AM

sheer genius and why have our representatives not announced this breakthrough? because big oil dumps a boatload of donations to every one of them so you see where their priorities lie,not with the American citizen for sure

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
jose 03/26/2012 11:00 AM

How about a few facts on how this new lens works.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
ldean50 03/23/2012 12:53 PM

TransWest LLC and the DOE are building a windfarm in CO and the electricity generated will travel on high-voltage power lines from CO to Las Vegas-expected completion date is 2014. It's supposed to power Vegas, Los Angeles and San Diego. TransWest is owned by CO billionaire Anspach (or something close) the guy that was financing Michael Jackson's comeback tour. Let's see how that turns out.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
ldean50 03/23/2012 12:58 PM

If I lived in CO, I think I would be aggravated by the fact that the windmills are being built in CO - while the benefit is being given to southern CA and NV. But Anspach has big financial interests in Los Angeles. I think we need an "investigative reporter." The only reason I know about it is because I'm involved in historic preservation and this power line is going to destroy the National Landmark known as the Mountain Meadow Massacre site in Utah. I'm on the fence. People need to look at.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
she343 04/25/2012 16:48 PM

this certainly isn't anything new-- I used to live within 5 miles of a nuke plant but the power went to another state (they got better rates for it)-- we got the extra cost and the danger while someone else got the electric!
Indian tribes didn't get any electric for having their lands contaminated from mining uranium ore-- just high cancer rates.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 04/08/2012 23:25 PM

Just think that most of all the power generated by the Hoover Dam goes to the LA area. What we need is power that is generated to supply the local area and any surplus energy then be feed onto the national grid.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
JoRo 03/21/2012 20:37 PM

Fantastic if this is real. Here is an interesting story as well.
http://money.cnn.com/video/news/2011/05/04/n_co_vestas_ceo.cnnmoney/

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Heather 03/21/2012 15:32 PM

"....Let's say we developed just 20 percent of those wind resources — 170,000 square miles (440,000 km2) or an area roughly 1/4 the size of Alaska...."

one forth the land area of Alaska? I want to see you get this past the enviromentalist loonies. Using that much land?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 03/31/2012 03:04 AM

IDK if anyone else noticed but 170,000 square miles happens to be larger than THE ENTIRE STATE OF CALIFORNIA! Every number based off of the calculations of this proposed wind farm is completely unrealistic.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Eric 03/23/2012 12:38 PM

Relative size spread throughout the United States... not an actual 1/4 portion of Alaska...

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
ldean50 03/23/2012 12:36 PM

As one of those environmentalist loonies - I'd vote for it; it is a non-lethal source of energy.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
why do not our Egyptian universities rake action about this 03/20/2012 20:28 PM

It is better and safer ,may be in addition to getting power from neuclear sources
senior translator, researcher , negotiater and blogger
salah m kamel

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
llaadi 03/18/2012 16:00 PM

Funny, just lately I've been wondering why wind turbines have to be so humungous, and they've seemingly only invented ONE style that can git 'er dun? Seems wack. While a lot of NIMBY Pimby old grumps hate the monstrous things with which they plan on lining every mountain range, we could (should) be coming up with smaller scale, individual-level solutions. Every home could have several solar panels and a smaller, lighter weight wind turbine and cut their bills in half or by a third....... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Al Finnell 03/20/2012 22:50 PM

The wind depends on "energy" to produce hp (watts). About 12 mph is required, and there is a thing called the Betts law which calculates the power possible.
I have a patent on a new turbine, and am in in the process of making a 5 meter rig now. This should make it possible for every farm to produce the power for the water pump, and a bit to spare. (for you information, a windmill is direct power, and has very little loss in efficiency. By having a generator, half of all power is.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 03/19/2012 16:53 PM

The only problem, wind technology relies on wind... which means when no wind, no power. So we need something reliable, predictable, don't we? I suppose everyone should have a diesel generator as backup.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
she343 04/25/2012 16:57 PM

not if they were tied into a grid-- wind will be blowing somewhere!
traditional plants also go down for maintenance and repairs-- we just pull from other sources on the grid.
The main thing is to reduce the amount of electric we use (we waste about 40%, we should start there). All answers make more sense if the amount needed is reduced.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 04/08/2012 23:34 PM

Then you don't just rely on wind alone. You have to combine your resources. Solar and wind are good choices. Producing energy from a gas or diesel generator is not cost effective for the average home owner, even if it is only done on a short term basis.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Al Finnell 03/20/2012 22:54 PM

You are spoiled. If you go back 70 years in the US, then a windmill was on every farm. There was a big watering tank to pump into when the wind blew. Normally this happens at early morning and during afternoon. When no wind, no water, so you have to have a big tank to handle the cattle in case of no wind for a day or so.
Get used to "outages" if you do not have a diesel. You plan your stuff around when the power is there.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
jeremy 03/25/2012 19:30 PM

but this isnt 70 years ago. we are looking for ways to better the lives of everyone all the time. loot at all the miserable people 70 years ago too, granted we still have poor and down trodden but look at the difference in the average persons life now compared to then.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ron McCune 03/16/2012 02:19 AM

We have to get away from the use of oil, coal and nuclear power because century's from now we need to leave the world some oil and coal and a clean environment that isn't destroyed by what we do today. It's obvious when we don't even have any more winters like we had 50 years ago that something is wrong. When winter temperatures are like spring weather you have to admit that global warming is here and there isn't no denying it. Progress is made when a better way is thought of and initiated. We.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Mseeker 03/16/2012 12:44 PM

About the climate temperature rise, it's curious that no one ever mention that when the Vikings came in Esperies ( North America) around year 800 to 900 after Christ, the named a big island " Groenland" Witch we call " GreenLand " a place where today lies a gigantic bloc of rapidly melting ice... The place was Green 1200 years ago...
much warmer then compare to our days....

When Christopher Columbus came here round 1492, he used a map from an Persian navigator called: Piri.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Lofty 04/05/2012 18:00 PM

Greenland and Iceland were named so to confuse travelers, or referred to as such by confused cartographers....Greenland WAS NOT a green pasture island 1200 years ago...you are just stupid.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
History student 03/17/2012 00:46 AM

Just to clarify, "Greenland" should actually be called Iceland and vice versa. The Vikings named them such to confuse and avoid other raiders from going to their actually place of habitation, Iceland. So in short Greenland is Icey and Iceland is green. Trust me, it sounds dumb but it is true, look it up.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Archaeologist 03/29/2012 05:16 AM

Sorry but you are wrong. Eric the Red settled Greenland. He named it Greenland to make it sound like a lush land of plenty to lure settlers with him.

The Vikings settled Greenland during a warm period were ice was mainly in the North where the Inuits settled a few decades later. As the weather returned to its normal colder cycle over about 20 years, the settlers experienced extreme hardships with failed crops, livestock starving through the winter and eventual abandonment by their.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Lofty 04/05/2012 18:06 PM

Erik named it Iceland, not to confuse invaders, but to confuse potential settlers...He was trying to attract people. There are several accounts of Erik saying this....You are just stupid also, read a book.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Lofty 04/05/2012 18:07 PM

OOps, relpied to wrong post....gya....the internets!

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
llaadi 03/18/2012 15:54 PM

^^^^ That is correct... The misinformation out there is incredible!!

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Odyssey 2050 03/16/2012 00:16 AM

Solar solar wind wind...no more nukes

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
jimvsmij 03/13/2012 13:45 PM

When recently polled, 9 out of 10 Fukushima residents answered "not in my backyard"

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 03/12/2012 16:52 PM

The author makes it sound like 1/4 the size of Alaska is relatively small. Building something of this scale is completely ridiculous! Take a look at a map.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 03/25/2012 15:05 PM

Do you have to put them all in one spot? What if there were 4 or 6 or 8 spots?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
ldean50 03/23/2012 12:38 PM

One quarter the size of Alaska vs. destroying the whole of the earth by oil, fracking and nukes? Is there a math teacher out there that can help us out?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 03/12/2012 16:49 PM

"...[it will] require a lot more maintenence than a typical coal or gas power plant. But in a lagging economy this might just be wind power's biggest upside — it will create lots and lots of permanent jobs..."

Huh??? So we should adopt a maintenance-heavy technology just to "create jobs"? Maybe we should also build our roads with shovels instead of earth-moving equipment. And forget water pipes to our homes; let's employ "lots and lots" of people with buckets. If a job is make-work it.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 03/16/2012 07:18 AM

Maybe our financial wealth is not the issue here.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 03/15/2012 20:50 PM

so what don't you understand about cheaper?

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Renewable Ray 03/12/2012 10:38 AM

Sure, wind is not constant. That's why renewable energy in the commercial distribution spectrum has the same challenges we do in the auto industry.......storage.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • >>
  • >|

Add your comment

Sign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below.
    Log in or
    create an account
     
    •  
Used only for emailed comments and will not be displayed with your post
Notify me with an email when other people comment on this article.
The posting of advertisement, profanity or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our Terms of Use

EDITORS' PICKS

tease to veggie grilling

tease to peak car

tease to bloggers

Earn 100 points for signing up for a free iMeet trial now.
JOIN NOW
Sponsored by

ADVERTISEMENT

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered

CONNECT WITH MNN

Follow @twitterapi
 Tumblr
 Google +

About Karl Burkart

Internet entrepreneur on green media and technology.

RSS feedMore about Karl

Recent Posts

  • Rock star charity seeks to Power the World
  • What do Leonardo DiCaprio, Linkin Park, Hayden Panettiere and Sergio Marone have in common?
  • Inhofe launches wacky 'Climate Hoax' book despite severe climate impacts in Oklahoma
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor

Interview with green strategist Lewis Perkins

Sustainability strategist and Fast Company blogger shares insights on corporate... more >

Go green anywhere, anytime with PGi

See the visual story of how one company is reducing the need for corporate travel... more >

Is there a telecommuting personality type?

Some individuals may be wired to succeed at working from home while others just... more >

Carbon calculator: Know your travel footprint

Travel is a reality for many business people, but not all businesses consider the... more >

PGi green data center: Efficiency brings environmental savings

The following article is based on an interview with Aaron Lafferty, PGi Director... more >
PGi: Better for your business, better for the planet

Karl's BLOGROLL

EcoGeekFast Company
MongabayPhysorg Tech
Red Green and BlueTrendHunter Eco
TreehuggerGetting Hot in Here
Triple PunditWeb Ecoist

ADVERTISEMENT



Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Advisory Board
  • Editors' Blog
  • Press
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Service
  • WorldShares

MNN Tools

  • Advice
  • Blogs
  • Day in History
  • Eco-glossary
  • Infographics
  • Lists
  • Photos
  • Videos

Connect

  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Contests
  • Idea Lab
  • Mixed Greens
  • Newsletters
  • Polls
  • RSS

Channels

  • Earth Matters
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Green Tech
  • Eco-Biz & Money
  • Your Home
  • Family
  • State Reports

Follow MNN

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Google+
  • StumbleUpon
 

Copyright © 2012 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE
 
SPONSORS