What's up with Copenhagen, Annex II?
What the richest (Annex II) nations need to do to avoid another Africa walkout in Copenhagen.
Photo by 350.org We're going around and around in circles on technical side issues rather than the core issue. The countries which have put pledges on the table which are within the range required by science are Norway and Japan. That's it.

The issue of targets has been one of the main sticking points in the stalled negotiations to agree a successor to the Kyoto Protocol. Large emerging economies such as China and India are refusing to adopt their own binding emission targets until rich nations agree to targets that are in line with that recommended by climate scientists.In response, industrialised nations have been reluctant to sign up to more demanding goals, fearing an economic advantage for those emerging economies that face less demanding emission targets.
- Australia
- Austria
- Belgium
- Canada
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Japan
- Luxembourg
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Norway
- Portugal
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Turkey
- United Kingdom
- USA
link:
| Previous Post What's up with Copenhagen, Annex 1? | Next Post What's up with Copenhagen, Obama? |


































