SPECIAL FEATURES:
Email
Do we still need daylight saving time?
Why everyone from the candy lobby to TV networks is weighing in on the daylight saving time debate.
Wed, Oct 19 2011 at 10:50 AM
Related Topics:
Photo: Mike Warot/Flickr
For nearly a century, Americans have been springing forward and falling back, and this year will be no different. Come Sunday morning, we'll all be snuggled soundly in bed when the clock changes an hour. Daylight saving time is the seasonal surprise that borrows an hour from our circadian rhythm in the spring and gives it back in the fall. (This year, you'll need to adjust your clocks on Sunday, Nov. 6 and Sunday, March 11.)
But whether or not we should disrupt the rhythm at all has spurred passionate debate from many disparate groups.
To better understand the situation, it's best to look at why we do these annual clock changes. Agrarian cultures built their societies around sunlight, waking up with the sun to toil in the field and heading home as the sun lowered beneath the horizon. But the industrial revolution brought with it the freedom to unshackle us from nature's clock.
As long ago as 1897, countries around the world began instituting daylight saving time, adding an hour of sunlight to the afternoon. This meant communities could be more productive — people could work longer, and when work was done it was still bright enough to run errands and stimulate the economy. The added daylight also meant more exposure to Vitamin D and the added time for people to exercise outdoors.
Everyone from factory owners to retailers embraced the change. Even the candy lobby supported the new system, figuring the extra hour of sunlight meant it would be safer for kids to go trick-or-treating on Halloween.
"It has several technical benefits as well," Dr. David Prerau, author of "Seize the Daylight: The Curious and Contentious Story of Daylight Saving Time," explained during a phone interview. "It's been found to reduce energy usage by doing something called load smoothing" — separating out electrical loads throughout the day to better deal with the valleys and peaks of energy usage — "and so you're going to generate energy more efficiently and therefore have less effects on pollution." A study by the U.S. Department of Transportation showed that the country's electricity usage is cut by 1 percent each day because of daylight saving time.
But not everyone is on board with the time shift.
Michael Downing, a teacher at Tufts University and the author of "Spring Forward: The Annual Madness of Daylight Saving Time," says messing with the clock doesn't really save energy. "Daylight saving is still a boon to purveyors of barbecue grills, sports and recreation equipment and the petroleum industry, as gasoline consumption increases every time we increase the length of the daylight saving period," Downing tells MNN. "Give Americans an extra hour of after-dinner daylight, and they will go to the ballpark or the mall — but they won't walk there."
Daylight saving time increases gasoline consumption, according to Downing. "It is a convenient and cynical substitute for a real energy conservation policy."
There's data to back him up. A report by the California Energy Commission's Demand Analysis Office concluded that, "The extension of daylight saving time (DST) to March 2007 had little or no effect on energy consumption in California."
Television networks aren't fans of the time change either. The extra hour of daylight means fewer people are home to watch TV. Viewership ratings traditionally plunge each spring. In 2009, Fox's hit "American Idol" clocked in historic low ratings immediately following the spring time change. On average, primetime shows shed 10 percent of their viewers on the Monday after the clocks are changed.
"I think television networks would like it to be dark as soon as you left the office and headed home for the night," Bill Gorman, of the website TV by the Numbers, told NPR. "And maybe it started raining or snowing a lot as soon as primetime began."
And it doesn't look like those issues will end anytime soon. As part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Congress pushed daylight saving time three to four weeks deeper into the fall.
That change has resulted in sunrises as late as 8:30 a.m. in some areas, causing ripple effects in unexpected places. For example, it has thrown a wrench into the lifestyle of observant Jews whose morning synagogue services are predicated on the sun. In fact, Prerau points out, Israel has a relatively short daylight saving time compared to other countries. "If sunrise is late, religious Jews have to delay going to work or pray at work, neither of which is a desirable situation," he says.
"If you don't like daylight saving time, you have plenty of options," explains A.J. Jacobs, the best-selling author of "The Know-It-All." He suggests moving to Arizona or Hawaii, states that don't observe daylight saving time at all. "Parts of Indiana used to be DST-resistant as well, but I think they've since buckled."
Even for those who do live in such states, it's not all easy living. "It's crazy. People forget about us not changing so they call at ridiculous times," says Anita Atwell Seate, a doctoral student at the University of Arizona in Tucson. "But on the upside, you don't have to adjust your sleep schedule or your clocks."
Is daylight saving time a fait accompli or will time ever just stand still? Downing doesn't see a light at the end of the tunnel. "Since 1966, every 20 years, Congress has given us another month of daylight saving. We're up to eight months now," he says. "And there is every reason to believe that the [U.S.] Chamber of Commerce, the national lobby for convenience stores — which account for more than 80 percent of all gasoline sales in the country — and Congress will continue to press for extensions until we adopt year-round daylight saving. And then, why not spring forward in March or April and enjoy double daylight saving time?"
Also on MNN:
You might also like:
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
EDITORS' PICKS
Advertisement
TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON
- Man tattoos puppy, faces backlash
- The squirrel that wears many hats
- 'Gay' dog rescued from Tenn. animal shelter
- The 8 happiest dogs on YouTube
- 7 ways to ensure you sleep more soundly
- Tornado survivor finds dog during live TV interview
- 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
- The 9 nastiest things in your supermarket
- 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
- 10 false facts most people think are true
From our sponsor
Follow us:
NEWSLETTER
Advertisement
I believe the author was referring to the change made in 2005, where the shift back to standard time was changed from the last Sunday in October to the first Sunday in November.
I always thought this was crazy. My mother would notLet us go trick or treating until it was dark!. When they elected to change the time late some years,that just ment we would have to wait until later to go out,and would be up later if it was a school night.
"instituting daylight saving time, adding an hour of sunlight to the day."
Please explain to me how this is possible. Do we alter the rotation period of the earth.
Also, if you told people that starting next week you will report for work 1 hour earlier there would be outrage but tell them to change their clocks and everyone is happy.
Adjust your life, not your clock.
"instituting daylight saving time, adding an hour of sunlight to the day."
Please explain to me how this is possible. Do we alter the rotation period of the earth.
Also, if you told people that starting next week you will report for work 1 hour earlier there would be outrage but tell them to change their clocks and everyone is happy.
Adjust your life, not your clock.
Let's compromise and go for a 1/2 hour permanent shift.
DST is great in June and July when it stays light until 9PM. Not so great this last week when sunrise was after 7:30 and would really stink in January when it would be 8:20A if DST was all year around. Bad enough when the cat thinks its time to get up at 5AM daybreak in July now, it would be much worse if the clocks didn't go forward and she started waking us at 4AM.
I think we should ban all travel between time zones. We would save a lot of energy and we wouldn't have these extremely dangerous sleep cycle disruptions.
Then instead of shipping goods from China to the US....maybe we would ship things from South America so they don't have to leave a given time zone.
If you look at a globe you'll see that much of South America lies east of North America and is up to 2 hours ahead of eastern time here in the states.
I live in NYC and its time to end this whole switching the clocks back and forth. Last year I ovserved DST all year round and I will do the same this year. Its DST now for 8 of the 12 months of the year. I care less what time it is in the winter. Please leave it either standard time (Preferred) or DST (just to keep everyone happy) all year.
The time changing back and forth is bad for people It disrupts the rest people need and doesn't give any benefit of any kind that I can see. Its nothing but a nuisance that is done twice a year that makes you have to change all your clocks and watches. I don't care which way the time is, as long as it stays the same year around. I'm surprised that there are not more people vocally complaining about it.
The time changing back and forth is bad for people It disrupts the rest people need and doesn't give any benefit of any kind that I can see. Its nothing but a nuisance that is done twice a year that makes you have to change all your clocks and watches. I don't care which way the time is, as long as it stays the same year around. I'm surprised that there are not more people vocally complaining about it.
DST should be year-round. Why not go to DST and stay there. I for 1 prefer it. Always have.
Agreed, I can get more done in the evenings. Coming home from work as it is getting dark is just depressing.
Pages