Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Tuesday, May 21, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Green Tech › Research & Innovations
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
New 'jelly' batteries could provide cheap, safe power for small electronics
Innovative polymer gel batteries promise a safer alternative to traditional lithium batteries.

By

John Platt
Tue, Sep 13 2011 at 11:41 AM
 41

Related Topics:

Energy Efficiency, Battery Technology, Energy
Jelly battery

DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME: This a block of polymer gel that has been pierced with screws to illustrate that the batteries will be safe even if punctured, unlike traditional lithium batteries. (Photo: University of Leeds)

 
Is your laptop too heavy? Blame your battery — but thankfully, bulky, heavy and potentially dangerous lithium batteries won't be around forever. Ian Ward, a physics research professor at the University of Leeds in the U.K. has come up with a new polymer gel — in other words, a jelly — that could be used to create a new kind of lithium battery that would be cheaper, lighter and more efficient.
 
"The polymer gel looks like a solid film, but it actually contains about 70 percent liquid electrolyte," Ward said in a prepared release. "It's made using the same principles as making a jelly: you add lots of hot water to 'gelatin' — in this case there is a polymer and electrolyte mix — and as it cools it sets to form a solid but flexible mass."
 
According to a news release, the new polymer gel can be formed into a thin, flexible film through a low-cost process. This film, which would lie between a battery's electrodes, would eliminate one need of traditional lithium batteries — to have multiple cells kept apart by a porous polymer film separator.
 
In addition to reducing weight and size, these new batteries could be made at about 10 percent of the cost of creating current batteries, Ward told IT Pro magazine.
 
The innovation could improve the safety of lithium-ion batteries, which have a tendency to overheat and possibly burst into flames, like the 54,000 batteries recalled by HP last year. "Conventional lithium batteries use electrolytes based on organic liquids; this is what you see burning in pictures of lithium batteries that catch fire," said another battery expert, professor Peter Bruce of the University of St Andrews, in an interview with BBC News. "Replacing liquid electrolytes by a polymer or gel electrolyte should improve safety and lead to an all-solid-state cell."
 
The technology has been licensed to an American company, Polystor Energy Corporation, which is conducting trials to commercialize the gel batteries for use in portable consumer electronics.
 
The idea of using gel to conduct or generate electricity is not new. This video shows how you can create an electric circuit at home using lemons, potatoes and Jell-O dessert:
 
 
And while we're at it, here are some other creative things you can do with Jell-O.
 
Also on MNN: 
  • Video gaming can improve vision for adults with lazy eye
  • United States if the Environment: What are your state's strengths and weaknesses?

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 41
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
The Professor Sep 19 2011 at 9:31 AM

On Gilligan's Island, we had sea water and coconuts. Perhaps we could conscript the unemployed and have them stir sea water in coconuts to generate energy as part of a jobs creation/energy program. (And to answer the question you are dying to ask: MayAnn.)

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Mike Land Sep 18 2011 at 12:17 PM

Is this the same technology as car jel cell batteries? We used to use them in our land rovers because they climbed hills and went into rivers and got wet or at extreme angles. But the problem was that a jel car battery had a average life of just 1 year.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 18 2011 at 10:41 PM

hemhem...gel

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
RoverJack Sep 18 2011 at 9:04 PM
Funny, same technology is used on a fleet of piston powered training aircraft, each average 700 and more hours a year (2000 hours is about equivalent to 100,000 miles usage of a car) and the gel cell batteries last about three years of up down, 3-4 gs, and heavy use. Perhaps those batteries in the Range Rover are a lot like the Range Rover itself; good parts poorly put together. Hate to say it, but as a Range Rover owner I'm very in tune to the Rover catastrophe. Imagine such a once grand automotive
.... More
name now owned by a no-name automaker in India. Sad it is.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Retired Engineer Sep 18 2011 at 12:10 PM

Note: this technology is being licensed by Motorola to Polystor. This is a big deal!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
scir91onYouTube Sep 17 2011 at 10:15 AM

i once had a dream that i had made an airconditioned pair of sneakers! they kept feet cool in the summer!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Fatty Matty Sep 17 2011 at 9:12 AM

Hope this works out better than the solar and wind energy scams....Solyndra anyone?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Blunttalk Sep 18 2011 at 6:13 PM

Solar is very viable and can be made cheaply. There is a new design that actually allows the panels to be shingle thin, look like shingles as they as produced in rolls. This technology however is being surpressed to continue to maximize profits.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 18 2011 at 5:54 PM
Where are you getting this mis-information from? Fact... recent govt. rebate programs are funding more than half the cost of solar installations, no maintenance is required for solar, manufacturing solar panels provides employment and is much better than "drill Baby drill", my solar panels are waranted for 20 years against any loss of efficiency and my solar panels provide for half of my electrical consumption, Switching to alternate renewable energy sources will change our energy dependency on
.... More
oil and will help save our environment. And lastly, it's "seem" not "seam".
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 18 2011 at 11:19 AM

"they need to be replaced about every 10 years."

That's a flat out lie. In fact most reputable solar companies have a 20+ year warranty on energy output. Wind turbines have a life expectancy of 20-30 years.

I suppose you support nuclear power, whats the half-life on spent nuclear fuel?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Awesome! Sep 18 2011 at 10:23 PM
Spent thorium fuel has a half life of like 12 years, which makes it safe after 300. It also produces far less waste than standard heavy water reactors. Thorium is a nuclear technolgy that is already proven, it just needs to be commercalized. But since we haven't built a plant in like 50 years. Nuclear can be scary because people don't understand it, but NOTHING rivals the power density of nuclear power, except fusion, which at this point we can't do. Solar power can take the edge of our power needs,
.... More
but it doesn't fix it. Its just part of the mix. Nuclear power and a hydrogen economy could completely replace our dependence on fossil fuels. Keep in mind, its not either/or. Its whatever we can make economical, safe, and work. Nuclear power generates alot less waste than you think. The worlds nuclear waste after 50 years of the worlds production using inefficant reactors fills a football stadium to a foot. Compare that to coal slurry, or car fumes that affect a substantial percentage of the earths atmosphere, and the answer is clear. Plus new Thorium based moltan salt reactors can actually burn just about anything nuclear, including waste. It breeds fuel from waste, which is used to create more fuel, which creates more waste, which can then be baked into fuel again. Its brilliant, seriouslly, look it up.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 18 2011 at 8:27 PM

The chances of the solar panel company to honor that warranty are slim to none. Most companies won't be around 20 years from now or will have changed hands so many times they won't honor a previous company's warranty. Knowing that I'd still go solar if I had the money.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Naturelover Sep 18 2011 at 11:14 PM

I am using solar panels for energy back up. and have had for for over 4 years, and they are fine. They were not that expensive, and instead of the Government spending money on wars, and black projects they could help Americans with alternative energy not nuclear, or gas, but then the big corporations wouldn't make no mo money, so it's a big Monopoly game. Just ask Stan Meyer. Gp ahead ask him! Yep that's what I thought..

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 18 2011 at 10:04 PM

Sharp? 20+ and not going anywhere.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
realityshow Sep 17 2011 at 9:33 PM

A lot of our current electricity generation is already provided by solar and wind, so it's hardly a scam.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
valm Sep 17 2011 at 1:39 AM

"The technology has been licensed to an American company" Go America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 18 2011 at 5:07 PM

But it wasn't licensed FROM an American company. We didn't invent it. FAIL America,.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 18 2011 at 10:25 PM

Whose side are you on?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Gel head Sep 16 2011 at 9:07 PM

No where in the article do they mention the elements that make up the battery. A gel discribes the material characteristics but not the compostion (e.g. Lithium). The Author needs to take a chemistry course and learn the Periodic table.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
rocket science Sep 17 2011 at 10:05 AM

you need to re-read the article, he said "polymer gel"

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 17 2011 at 8:39 AM

The article clearly says "a new kind of lithium battery". I think the author is fine with his chemistry and this reader needs to work on his reading comprehension.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Rasterr44 Sep 16 2011 at 3:54 PM

Actually I had a vision regarding a car that was a battery. Everything was made of mediums that could store an electrical charge which ran the electric motors and also recharged itself from its movement. Radical but I had this over 50 years ago!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 20 2011 at 2:33 AM

Interesting concept........on a lighter note, if the seat tore or the dash cracked......it could electrocute you:)

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
rocket science Sep 17 2011 at 10:07 AM

won't work dude. friction losses alone dictate that. not to mention electrical losses just in heat alone

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 17 2011 at 1:25 AM

A perpetual energy machine is not a new idea, but it also isn't feasible. Yes, there are ways to approach one and make things more efficient but the idea of perpetual energy is something we can only dream of, as no chemical reaction is capable of keeping 100% of it's energy (or mass.. the two being intertwined and all). I maybe did a bad job explaining at as I'm not a physicist but maybe someone else can explain it better.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

Pages

  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Log in or register to post comments

EDITORS' PICKS

tease painting

line

tease devil's kettle

line

tease calories

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  2. What causes tornadoes?
  3. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  4. 10 false facts most people think are true
  5. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  6. 20 ways to reuse coffee grounds, tea leaves
  7. 15 houseplants to improve indoor air quality
  8. The 9 nastiest things in your supermarket
  9. When is tornado season?
  10. 5 life lessons learned by working at McDonald's
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor
Civic Accelerator: A Platform for Social Entrepreneurship
A competition between 10 finalists, the program offers seed money for enterprises that inspire, more...
Reinventing the meeting
AltruHelp addresses 5 reasons millennials don't volunteer
The online social platform aims to boost flagging volunteer rates among this generation by making more...
Reinventing the meeting
BOULD housing project creates green ‘learning laboratories’
A Denver-based civic venture constructs high-quality green housing for low-income families while more...
Reinventing the meeting
Students use CareerVillage to get advice from real professionals
Young people from low-income communities submit career questions via the website and get answers more...
Reinventing the meeting
Generation Citizen strengthens democracy by empowering youth
Program partners college students with high schools to challenge the younger students to find more...
Reinventing the meeting

Follow us:

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS