Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Sunday, May 19, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › MNN BLOGGERS
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
5 things you need to know about green cars
If you're holding back from buying an electric or plug-in hybrid, read this story. Some of what you think you know may turn out to be wrong.
Tue, Sep 27 2011 at 10:58 AM
 107

Related Topics:

Electric Vehicles, Battery Technology, MNN lists, Tesla Roadster, Nissan Leaf
Fisker Karma

PRICE PREMIUM: The Fisker Karma will cost $96,850 ... but there's a $7,500 federal income tax credit! (Photo: Jim Motavalli)

Don’t worry about battery life: The biggest question I get about electric vehicles is about that great big battery pack — will I be out thousands of dollars if the most expensive component in the car gives out on me? People ask this both because they don’t want to be liable for buying a new pack and because they’re worried about the pack ending up polluting a landfill. Neither is likely to happen. The pack in the Nissan Leaf, for instance, is warranted for eight years or 100,000 miles, whichever comes first, and the Chevrolet Volt’s pack (as of the 2012 model year) is good for 10 years or 150,000 miles. Long warranties are essential for getting some of these cars low-emission status in California, whose rules are followed by 13 other states. The longevity record is very good on battery packs, anyway — very few hybrids have needed to replace them. It’s also important to note that nearly all automakers have signed on to battery recycling programs, and packs are expected to also have second lives as backup for renewable energy (for instance, storing nighttime energy from wind turbines to be used during the day).
 
Plug-in hybrids are not range challenged: When the Toyota Prius first came out, the public was generally misinformed about how the cars worked — the belief that hybrids needed to be plugged in was fairly widespread. We’ve finally got past that one, but now we have a whole new challenge with plug-in hybrids, which are plugged in to achieve 15 miles of all-electric range (the Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid), 25 to 40 miles (the Chevrolet Volt) or 50 miles (the forthcoming Fisker Karma). Many people lump them in with battery EVs as short-range vehicles. But when the electric miles are history, the car still has a long way to travel. The gas engine either drives the wheels like a standard hybrids (the plug-in Prius) or acts as a generator (the Volt and Karma) to deliver another 300 miles of travel. And the transition to gas power is seamless — your hair won’t even get mussed up. So, plenty of range in plug-in hybrids.
 
Don’t wait for public charging: Are you worried about owning an electric car because there won’t be anywhere to plug the car in? Calm down. Some 80 percent of EV charging will be done at home, where you’re likely to have a government-subsidized charger in the garage (or outside if you don’t have a garage), and that will always be the best (and cheapest) place to tank up on electricity. The public charger at the local Walgreen’s or in front of the bank (that's an AeroVironment example at right) may well cost more than home charging — because many of the networks are being put in by profit-making companies. Think of public charging as your backup plan when range anxiety sets in. And even if you don’t see a public infrastructure now, you probably will soon — the cars are rolling out slowly, and the charging will go in as they hit the showrooms.
 
Electric cars aren’t as expensive as they seem: Yes, the prices are in the $30K-range (Leaf, Mitsubishi i), $40s (the Volt) and higher ($96,850 for a Fisker Karma, $109,000 for a Tesla Roadster). But luxury cars are always expensive, and you can take whatever price quoted and deduct the $7,500 federal tax credit, as well as a 30 percent (up to $1,000) tax credit for installing a garage charger. And then there’s the very low operating costs. As one rule of thumb, a gas car that gets 20 mpg average would cost 20 cents a mile to operate, and a comparable electric just 3 cents. So you do start saving money immediately, though it may take a while before you pay back that initial investment. I think that automakers are likely to offer lower-priced electric vehicles with, say, 50-mile range instead of 100. That means a half-sized battery pack and a much lower bottom line. Those cars aren’t here yet.
 
It pays to be an early adopter: Consider this. If you’re a Californian and you jumped on the Nissan Leaf waiting list when they first announced it, you probably not only have your car now but also
1) A free charger, courtesy of ECOtality;
2) A huge cut in the bottom line, combining that federal tax credit with the $5,000 state rebate from a fund that's been totally exhausted since last July;
3) The catbird seat in the state high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, because standard hybrid cars like the Prius are now banned from them. All told, your $32,000 Leaf probably ended up costing $20,000. Plus you got bragging rights, a crowd that gathered whenever you parked, and coverage in the hometown paper. The Tesla Roadster is still rare enough that owners get mobbed, but that won’t last forever. If you don’t like getting surrounded and being asked a million questions, perhaps this is not an asset.
 
Here's how the tragic loss of access to HOV lanes looked to Californian hybrid owners last summer. Many panicked Angelenos, including my own cousin, are looking at buying a battery car to get back to the HOV garden:
 

The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.

Previous Post
Obama's fuel economy rules a job killer, auto dealers say
Next Post
Rush is wrong (about General Motors)

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 107
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
kat Oct 05 2011 at 3:03 PM

What about potentially harmful electromagnetic radiation?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Evan Oct 03 2011 at 9:54 AM

I heard somewhere that if you produced a car with the 3 cylinder Prius engine (that does not have to pass emissions for some reason) into a similar sized car, without the weight of all the batteries and electric gizmos in the Prius, the car would get over 60 mpg ! Forget electrics and hybrids, just start making inexpensive, high mpg, commuter cars.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
graphikzking
graphikzking Oct 03 2011 at 10:28 AM
Unfortuntely that information is incorrect. The prius battery pack only weighs about 120 lbs. The electric motor, wiring etc only weigh another 60-70lbs. You're looking at a total weight penalty of less than 200lbs. (1 average sized adult male basically). Also, the prius does NOT have a 3cylinder engine. - The smart car has a 3 cylinder engine and is extremely light weight yet gets 33city and 41hwy. The Prius gets 50 city and 50 highway. If you take out all the Prius gizmos, make the car smaller
.... More
and lighter etc, then you have a Toyota Yaris. The yaris gets about 15 less mpg combined than a prius. The prius is the same size as a Camry inside in leg room etc. I'm anxious to see the new Prius C mpg ratings. The car should weight under 2800lbs and probably get about 60mpg combined. This will be a very nice hybrid if they can keep the price below 20k. 60mpg and under 20k will be a huge huge seller!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
pat.hanna's picture
pat.hanna Oct 03 2011 at 9:27 AM
I'm really tired of all the electric hype. There IS an option that really works, and with the proper stimulus and investment would replace our current lifestyle seamlessly -- Hydrogen Fuel Cells! Not quite as energy efficient and perhaps a little less cost-effective energy-wise, BUT, with a proper infrastructure they would give us the 'range' needed to travel around and be transportationally independent that plugging in your electric vehicle for several hours every 2-300 miles (at best) will never
.... More
provide. Just try to imagine visiting your family or friends who live 6-700 (or more) miles away. How many days of travel time would that entail, including multi-hour stops to recharge your batteries 2 or 3 times? And over time, even our big trucks, the major transportation resource in our food/goods chain could also be converted to run on fuel cells. Fuel cells would 'cost' more in terms of total electricity consumption, but the fuel cell production would be in large industrial complexes, wired and designed to handle the load, not coming directly off of individual user's grids -- which would mean people wouldn't be stranded if storms or other natural disasters knocked out local power for a few days. How bad do you suppose rolling blackouts will become in the summer if millions of electric vehicles are being charged while millions of people are cooling their homes with air conditioners? Electic cars will NEVER provide the personal mobility we have grown to expect and rely on in our society. Also, fuel cell technology would be MUCH cheaper and easier to implement than the large-scale public transit needed to get people around farther than the meager range their electric vehicles would provide.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
coasterpro
coasterpro Oct 03 2011 at 4:13 AM

Electric Hybrids are not the only kind of hybrids. There are many ways to store wasted or unused energy from the vehicle system. I would like to see more effort put into compressed air hybrids, hydraulic hybrids, and flywheels.These systems do not require expensive batteries, are potentially just as good as an electric hybrid, and are easily cheaper.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
coasterpro
coasterpro Oct 03 2011 at 4:01 AM
"Some 80 percent of EV charging will be done at home" Fantastic. Some 34% of Americans rent their homes and that number is increasing every year. Home ownership is going the way of the Dodo and with it the prospect for charging an EV. So the market for EVs is already a fraction of the total car market. Add to that the lack of versatility of pure EVs (ie. no long distance driving, limited commute distance, questionable cold weather performance, etc.) and the market is pared down even further. It's
.... More
easy to see why EVs never took off when they were first introduced decades ago. EV's are specialty vehicles that, while catering nicely to niche markets, can never satisfy the needs of general motoring. Hybrids are a different story of course.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Huh? Oct 03 2011 at 12:27 AM

Government subsidies for the car. Subsidies for the garage charging station. If a technology requires this many subsidies, it means it is not economically viable. The market may be slow (or not fast enough for you) but it gets there when it is time. It is by definition not time. When demand can support electrics with out what will likely be eternal handouts it will be time.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
EVsRoll Oct 02 2011 at 11:38 PM

A couple of notes about range:

1. Most people take local trips in their cars, well under 50 miles. They do not need 300 miles of range except to feel good.

2. Chevy Volt users have hundreds of miles of possible range. It has been noted though that most of them are keeping within the 40 mile battery pack range anyway!

EVsRock!
http://www.evsroll.com

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
logicalConclusion Oct 02 2011 at 11:29 PM
It will probably take at least 20 years to get the plans, permits and resources to build enough electric generating facilities to handle widespread use of electric cars. In the meantime, our electric bills will necessarily go up to cover the cost of creating the new infrastructure. The poor and working class couldn't afford these cars. Federal and state governments don't have the money to subsidize something unnecessary, though noble it may be. The government doesn't have the money. Regular folks
.... More
are hard pressed to buy anything in the price range, especially now that folks will be inclined to do much more saving because of this recession (think hoarders born in the depression). Not to mention the fossil fuels used to make the electricity to power electric vehicles (isn't it ironic). Electric vehicles: interesting alternative not ready for prime time that burns fossil fuels in absentia. Nice try...
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Nissan Altima H... Aug 24 2012 at 3:14 PM

Wow. Have you bothered to research anything you've spoken about? You are totally WRONG! We don't need to build ANY new "electric generating facilities". We have enough electric capacity right now. There's a surplus of electricity available at night, since businesses are mostly closed, and most people sleep. The majority of EV charging is done at night. What a convenient situation! I am a "working class" person who bought a hybrid, and I love getting 40+ MPG!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Aug 24 2012 at 4:25 PM

I get 37 summer avg, 35 winter, and 44 summer on trips, using my non-hybrid 2004 Mitsibushi Lancer. I can also blow pretty much everyone (except another Mitsubishi) off the line, no prob.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
dc Oct 03 2011 at 10:25 AM

Are you aware that we are paying subsidies to OIL companies?? There was a lot of discussion about this when congress was arguing the debt celiing. Of course the republicans made sure that these subsidies dodnt end. Does this mean that oil isnt feasable?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Michael Oct 02 2011 at 10:44 PM
It's amazing, guess it's has to do with being around for a while. People have been asking car companies to make more fuel efficient cars for decades, more than say 15 to 20mpg. Now all of a sudden with hybrids and plug-in hybrids we have regular cars being sold that get 30 to 40 mpg. I am sorry, but if there was ever a conspiracy to defraud, it is by the big car companies, not the workers, but should be prosecuted CEO's, that never put America's interest first! I love Hybrids and Plug-In Hybrids,
.... More
but we should have regular cars, with minor tweaks to the engines getting 50 to 80 mpg, I am sure it can be done. We would not need to import oil, fight wars in the middle east (loose 1,000's of brave young men and women). Somehow when our founding fathers were crafting our wonderful democracy, I am sure they never envisioned these treasonus CEO's who make them self rich at the severe detriment to our Nations well being!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Terry Oct 02 2011 at 1:31 PM

Just thought I'd mention plug-in hybrids and EV's are also subsidized by not paying Federal Highway and State gasoline taxes. .37 a gallon in Michigan. Can't see that subsidy lasting forever. Other than that as mentioned above I really like plug-in hybrids since electricity is almost 100% domestic (ok not uranium). While 50% of our oil is imported.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Blessed Geek Oct 02 2011 at 11:04 AM

I don't understand. The Chevy Metro manual shift, with careful driving without need of obsessive hypermiling gives me at least 50 mpg. And it was a cheap car. It performs even better than a Prius and it is not hybrid.

New, small size high mpg cars are so expensive. Why aren't there sub-$10K small size 50 mpg highway capable cars being sold anymore in the US?

Why would we need a big huge car when a Chevy Metro suffices. Public conspiracy: WHO KILLED THE CHEVY METRO?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Oct 03 2011 at 10:26 AM

Try tuning the radio in this rock and roll cheap buckboard of a car while moving down a moderately bumpy road! I had a Metro, you'll never get me in that beer can again!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
TeslaReborn Oct 02 2011 at 10:43 AM

Battery Cars basically hands the industry over to China. Battery as known will not work. MUST Rebuild electric transmission along roads, hybrids use the electricity when available along road. Transmission efficiency improvements cover about half the transportation needs.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
I loves my fore... Oct 02 2011 at 8:57 AM
I'm not discounting the fact this tech is very expensive right now. I do dismiss many of the minor points quibbled here. Either you can afford it or not. There is no arguing this is the right direction as far as I'm concerned. Yes coal is a dirty fuel but I would rather deal withbthose consequences as I have to believe we can move forward with improvements to coal/electricity production. We have bright people in this country and a shared future at stake. What we have little control over is foreign
.... More
oil, resulting foreign soil military involvements and all the myriad problems resulting from our archaic dependance on forign oil. Move this tech forward and now.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Yes1fan Oct 02 2011 at 10:37 PM
...uhhhh...I believe I argued the point, with one NOT so minor. ANY focus away from oil-from-algae is terribly misguided. Reasons include: 1) Electric will NEVER be feasible for other types of transportation. such as air travel, unless we start putting some of NASA's portable nuclear power plants on planes - not good! 2) Oil is the ONLY energy source with sufficient power / weight ratio to drive for any distance in a blizzard, and to haul heavy loads (trucking, most rail), without MAJOR (inefficient)
.... More
electric infrastructure investment. 3) Making new infrastructure is neither cheap nor energy-free - e.g. I have serious doubts that the energy received from a windmill's lifetime is actually greater than the energy expended into it's manufacture plus installation (not to mention all the birds killed, vistas ruined, damage from trails blazed to install them, and the never-studied issue on the environment of resulting natural wind reduction). 4) Making entirely new types of cars, the tooling, and resulting new wars over lithium, is neither cheap nor energy-free. 5) By replacing drilling & mining, wars over oil, oil-refining, eliminating smokestack emissions, eliminating catalytic converters (not needed with sulfur-free oil), eliminating the need to establish NEW infrastructures for (lousy performing) electric alternatives, with the single focus of solar-based OIL MANUFACTURING, will be a HUGE net+ energy, human capital, and global-enhancement-of-life GAIN. Imagine GROWING enough oil on your roof & yard each day, to power your daily home and travel needs - talk about freedom & self-sufficiency! I am amused that no one responded to my post. Perhaps it threatens not just oil-industry, but also, too many alternative-energy, agendas on MNN??
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
TeslaReborn Oct 02 2011 at 10:37 AM

NOTE: read note below. Big gain is NOT in electricity production. The electric transmission system is very old, costly, and very inefficient. Put it along roadways as noted, 'bleed' juice for vehicles, which mostly only use energy when going up hills. Solutions are simple but existing companies (cars and oil) control all.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
JeramieH Oct 02 2011 at 5:32 AM

I drove my last car to 300K miles. A car that can only survive 100K miles isn't worth squat to me.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
dc Oct 03 2011 at 10:32 AM

Was your last car waranteed to go 300k miles? Any part of it? It doesnt matter anyway. We dont have to covert everything to electrics. If we can use electricity for 75% of of our driving, it benefilts everyone. The price of oil will drop dramatically when the demand drops the same way. Both types of vehicles will be needed, and both will cost less to operate than now when we have widespread electrics/hybrids.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Dan Oct 02 2011 at 11:02 AM

To true, this mirrors my post. Get a warranty of 250K on batteries alone and we'll talk, that's my line.
This of course won't currently happen , because the batteries just aren't good enough.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
TeslaReborn Oct 02 2011 at 1:12 AM

Our electric transmission system is ancient and inefficient. If rebuilt along roadways, hybrid vehicles could get power from 'roadway' even very large trucks. Gas kicks in if/when road juice not available. Maybe a zero-sum game because current waste in electric transmission so great.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Aug 24 2012 at 4:07 PM

Locally-generated electricity from a small Oil-from-Algae power plant has the potential to eliminate most line-loss, as well as most power lines.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

Pages

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
  • last »

EDITORS' PICKS

tease kids in woods

line

tease stargazing

line

tease hand

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 20 ways to reuse coffee grounds, tea leaves
  2. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  3. The 9 nastiest things in your supermarket
  4. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  5. 10 false facts most people think are true
  6. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  7. Best air-filtering houseplants, according to NASA
  8. Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
  9. Making soap: 5 tips for homemade soap
  10. How to clean brass naturally
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor
Green autocross shows off Mercedes F-CELL technology
Mercedes-Benz customers take the automaker's groundbreaking emission-free F-CELL car for a more...
Driving a Cleaner Tomorrow
Breakthrough traction system maintains safety on slippery roads
4MATIC all-wheel drive optimizes individual wheels enabling advanced handling and control as road more...
Driving a Cleaner Tomorrow
Zero-emissions F-CELL car a hit with green celebrities
Emitting nothing but water vapor as it cruises around the city on hydrogen power rather than fossil more...
Driving a Cleaner Tomorrow
From 60 to zero: Braking innovations boost performance
Adaptive Braking Technology from Mercedes-Benz uses sensors to predict emergency stops, allowing more...
Driving a Cleaner Tomorrow
NYC youth get 120 new coaches with Laureus USA program
Mercedes-Benz and the Laureus Sport for Good Foundation team up to train and place coaches in more...
Driving a Cleaner Tomorrow

Mercedes-Benz USA on Facebook

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered

ABOUT Jim Motavalli

New York Times contributor blogs about green transportation.

More about Jim RSS feed

Recent Posts

  • The Porsche 918 Spyder: An electrified bat out of hell
  • Cellphone driving deaths: Toll is higher than you think
  • Tesla on a roll, selling more electric cars than anyone else
+ Add this to my site
Advertisement
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS