Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Saturday, May 18, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › MNN BLOGGERS
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
5 things you need to know about green cars
If you're holding back from buying an electric or plug-in hybrid, read this story. Some of what you think you know may turn out to be wrong.
Tue, Sep 27 2011 at 10:58 AM
 107

Related Topics:

Electric Vehicles, Battery Technology, MNN lists, Tesla Roadster, Nissan Leaf
Fisker Karma

PRICE PREMIUM: The Fisker Karma will cost $96,850 ... but there's a $7,500 federal income tax credit! (Photo: Jim Motavalli)

Don’t worry about battery life: The biggest question I get about electric vehicles is about that great big battery pack — will I be out thousands of dollars if the most expensive component in the car gives out on me? People ask this both because they don’t want to be liable for buying a new pack and because they’re worried about the pack ending up polluting a landfill. Neither is likely to happen. The pack in the Nissan Leaf, for instance, is warranted for eight years or 100,000 miles, whichever comes first, and the Chevrolet Volt’s pack (as of the 2012 model year) is good for 10 years or 150,000 miles. Long warranties are essential for getting some of these cars low-emission status in California, whose rules are followed by 13 other states. The longevity record is very good on battery packs, anyway — very few hybrids have needed to replace them. It’s also important to note that nearly all automakers have signed on to battery recycling programs, and packs are expected to also have second lives as backup for renewable energy (for instance, storing nighttime energy from wind turbines to be used during the day).
 
Plug-in hybrids are not range challenged: When the Toyota Prius first came out, the public was generally misinformed about how the cars worked — the belief that hybrids needed to be plugged in was fairly widespread. We’ve finally got past that one, but now we have a whole new challenge with plug-in hybrids, which are plugged in to achieve 15 miles of all-electric range (the Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid), 25 to 40 miles (the Chevrolet Volt) or 50 miles (the forthcoming Fisker Karma). Many people lump them in with battery EVs as short-range vehicles. But when the electric miles are history, the car still has a long way to travel. The gas engine either drives the wheels like a standard hybrids (the plug-in Prius) or acts as a generator (the Volt and Karma) to deliver another 300 miles of travel. And the transition to gas power is seamless — your hair won’t even get mussed up. So, plenty of range in plug-in hybrids.
 
Don’t wait for public charging: Are you worried about owning an electric car because there won’t be anywhere to plug the car in? Calm down. Some 80 percent of EV charging will be done at home, where you’re likely to have a government-subsidized charger in the garage (or outside if you don’t have a garage), and that will always be the best (and cheapest) place to tank up on electricity. The public charger at the local Walgreen’s or in front of the bank (that's an AeroVironment example at right) may well cost more than home charging — because many of the networks are being put in by profit-making companies. Think of public charging as your backup plan when range anxiety sets in. And even if you don’t see a public infrastructure now, you probably will soon — the cars are rolling out slowly, and the charging will go in as they hit the showrooms.
 
Electric cars aren’t as expensive as they seem: Yes, the prices are in the $30K-range (Leaf, Mitsubishi i), $40s (the Volt) and higher ($96,850 for a Fisker Karma, $109,000 for a Tesla Roadster). But luxury cars are always expensive, and you can take whatever price quoted and deduct the $7,500 federal tax credit, as well as a 30 percent (up to $1,000) tax credit for installing a garage charger. And then there’s the very low operating costs. As one rule of thumb, a gas car that gets 20 mpg average would cost 20 cents a mile to operate, and a comparable electric just 3 cents. So you do start saving money immediately, though it may take a while before you pay back that initial investment. I think that automakers are likely to offer lower-priced electric vehicles with, say, 50-mile range instead of 100. That means a half-sized battery pack and a much lower bottom line. Those cars aren’t here yet.
 
It pays to be an early adopter: Consider this. If you’re a Californian and you jumped on the Nissan Leaf waiting list when they first announced it, you probably not only have your car now but also
1) A free charger, courtesy of ECOtality;
2) A huge cut in the bottom line, combining that federal tax credit with the $5,000 state rebate from a fund that's been totally exhausted since last July;
3) The catbird seat in the state high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, because standard hybrid cars like the Prius are now banned from them. All told, your $32,000 Leaf probably ended up costing $20,000. Plus you got bragging rights, a crowd that gathered whenever you parked, and coverage in the hometown paper. The Tesla Roadster is still rare enough that owners get mobbed, but that won’t last forever. If you don’t like getting surrounded and being asked a million questions, perhaps this is not an asset.
 
Here's how the tragic loss of access to HOV lanes looked to Californian hybrid owners last summer. Many panicked Angelenos, including my own cousin, are looking at buying a battery car to get back to the HOV garden:
 

The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.

Previous Post
Obama's fuel economy rules a job killer, auto dealers say
Next Post
Rush is wrong (about General Motors)

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 107
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
Guest Oct 01 2011 at 2:29 PM

It's not strange that home owners receive more benefits. We pay more in taxes than renters. Try buying and take advantage like the rest of us.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Mallory Sep 30 2011 at 3:42 PM

Common, not necessarily. I'm a renter and my property owner gave me permission to install a charging station in my parking spot when I got my Leaf. I of course was responsible for all the costs and the electricity is coming off my bill. If you know you'll be in your place for awhile (I have rent control in Santa Monica, I ain't leaving) and you have a good relationship with your property owner, it's worth a shot.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
tarrant's picture
Tarrant Oct 01 2011 at 8:46 AM

May I ask about the cost of installing the charging station? That is something I have wondered about as far as owning an EV.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Anon Sep 30 2011 at 12:46 PM

Electric cars may seem like a good idea, but it really depends on where you live. Here in western Canada, most of our power comes from coal power plants. By buying an electric car here you are essentially paying to trade a gas powered car for an even dirtier coal powered car. It just defies logic to buy one in many areas.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
D Palmer Sep 30 2011 at 5:38 PM
I don't agree. Power plant output is measured in megawatts, that is 1 million watts (1,000 kilowatts). A typical home charger draws from 5-10 kw of power. I could be wrong, but I don't believe that plant output is managed to that fine a level. Plugging a single EV, or even 100 into it's charger has no measurable impact on a plant that is already producing several million watts of power. Once EV's achieve a higher penetration then their cumulative impact will have to be taken into account, but for
.... More
now I just don't believe that plugging in your EV/Hybrid results in additional power plant emissions.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Poison Jack Sep 30 2011 at 2:14 PM
An electric car goes about 2.9 miles per KWh of energy, less than 4 cents a mile. Generating electricity from coal generates a pound of CO2 per KWh. So if you travel 300 miles in an electric car you will generate 103 pounds of coal-fired CO2. A gas car goes about 21.5 miles on average on a gallon of gasoline, which produces 14 pounds of CO2 when it burns. That's 195 pounds of gas-powered CO2, or you would have to have a fuel economy of about 40.82 mpg to match the efficiency of an electric car.
.... More
Chances are, you will need to double your fuel economy to save the environment, or at least to do it less damage. How are you doing so far?
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
rockriver Sep 30 2011 at 12:39 PM

Another colossal missing of the point. The use of personal automobiles as we do can not be sustained just by changing the form of energy that turns the wheels. We have to sharply reduce our habit of driving everywhere. The big push to electric cars is just an exercise in denial.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Deathstalker Sep 30 2011 at 12:51 PM

To many anyone that says you don't need to drive is un-American. Driving is my freedom maybe you don't like it but I drive 25k miles per year average many times more then that. I love to drive and so do most Americans. Getting off gas is the best thing we can do for our country. We send close to 300 billion of American dollars over seas to other countries that hate us every year. We need to keep all those American green dollars right here where they belong.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
BNL Sep 30 2011 at 4:04 PM

I don't understand what you're saying here. You think the answer is to drive less (I agree) and yet you drive an average of 68 miles per day? Are you planning on changing that, or are you proposing an answer that you yourself don't care to partake in?

I don't own a car. It was the best economical and ecological decision I've ever made.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guy H. King Sep 30 2011 at 12:04 PM

Natural gas cars are still better, more efficient and less of a
problem to use. And you don't have to burn a lot of coal to get a little juice.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
I. Mold Sep 30 2011 at 11:16 AM
I'm in that big generation that's retired (me), or soon to retire, and I would never consider a car with any kind of electric drive; for the mileage I drive, a slightly used Lincoln Town Car would be more economical than a Prius for the time I have left to drive. And that's going the speed limit, not 10-30 mph under it, like so many Prius drivers do where I live. And why does anyone that can afford a $96,000 car get a $7500 tax credit? I don't care if the car ran on air, that's just subsidizing
.... More
the rich.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
DriftSS Sep 30 2011 at 10:35 AM
Hybrids like the Prius are NOT great or eco-friendly. For example, my gas-only Honda HX gets 40MPG in traffic and 44 on the highway. ULEV and runs forever. A Prius gets only marginally better mileage (only if AC and lights not one) and after 8-10 years will require a $5-10k battery pack. And when they fail they will NOT get reused like in the article. Have you ever seen ANY electronic product from cell phones to lap tops to tools in which ANY rechargeable battery pack has not worn out?? Get real.
.... More
It is a big problem and huge expense. Why do you think the manufacture has the 100k warranty. Problem is that for the 2nd owner the car is a major fail and worthless when it eventually goes.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Mobius007 Oct 01 2011 at 8:28 PM

I've got a 2005 Civic HX with 331,000 miles and I get 46 MPG on the highway, still!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
No Way Jose Oct 01 2011 at 8:13 AM

The battery packs are not near that expensive and can actually be repaired by just replacing a bad cell. Many a Prius has been used as a taxi cab with lots of miles and very few problems. My best tank so far is 57.2 miles per gallon. You need to do some research before you shoot off your mouth.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
PriusOwnerinMD Sep 30 2011 at 11:30 AM

Not sure if this changes your analysis, but my husband gets an average of 60mpg in his Prius, driving a combo of highway and stop-and-go traffic. That's his average over the year, and he uses AC and lights as appropriate. In some months he can top 63mpg. You're still correct that many hybrids (e.g., Ford Fusion) don't do any better than your Honda HX, for which I commend you.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Kenney B Sep 30 2011 at 10:12 AM
I will never buy a non-hybrid car again - they are moronically inefficient for not capturing all the kinetic energy in a vehicle in motion. We have had the means to do this for over 20 years, but Detroit big 3 was too stupid and corrupt to use it.When I shopped for my car in 2009, and there wasn't a car on the road that even came close to the Prius for overall value, price, reliability, leg and headroom (I am 6'1"), and comfort. If there was, I would have bought it instead. And yes, electricity here
.... More
in Ohio is from coal, natural gas, and Nukes. Who wants to hassle with and extension cord every day in the dead of an Ohio winter anyhow. I just push a button and go - 50 MPG.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Russ Cohen Sep 29 2011 at 7:57 PM

Does anyone know if any plug-in hybrids are currently (or soon) available for station wagons and/or four/all wheel drive cars? I currently drive a conventionally-powered Subaru Outback wagon and I (and I am sure many others) would get a plug-in model were one available.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
suzanne
suzanne Sep 28 2011 at 5:36 PM
I’m glad that the motorcyclists remain in California’s carpool lane: way to go! In spite of California’s law which now prohibits solo drivers with gas electric hybrid’s usage in the carpool lane. Still, owing a hybrid is one to consider as it’s a plus: it’s the future and I welcome it. Jim Motavalli, thanks for a great article on green transportation! Suzanne McMillen-Fallon, Published Author 2011 “On Wings of Love”http://www.strategicpublishinggroup.com/title/Mommy’sWritings.html (
.... More
currently not active) The Mommy’s Writings Series Mommy, would you like a sandwich? Book 1
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
amgican's picture
amgican Sep 28 2011 at 10:09 AM
People must also understand that if you live in areas where coal is the primary source of electricity, if you plug into the grid to charge your all electric vehicle, you're actually responsible for MORE greenhouse gasses than if you had driven your gas powered vehicle. Just because it's electric doesn't mean it is clean or green. You have to consider the source of that electricity. However, if you have a grid-tied solar system, you can generate that energy locally and charge your vehicle during the
.... More
day. Doing this ensures you are using clean energy.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Deathstalker Sep 30 2011 at 12:59 PM
The thing is even if it is coal now the more we use our own energy the more money stays here in America which is much much better for our economy. We are also adding more solar and wind farms every day. We need to focus on the positive here. The more energy we use here at home the more jobs and the more potential for renewable enery. Gas is not the way to go mostly because we send our American dollars to countries that hate us and use that money to buy weapons to kill us with. Keep the american green
.... More
backs in America even if we use it for pollution right now. We are trying to transform more and more of our energy into clean renewable and the more money we keep here for energy the more we can invest in the clean energy we need.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 30 2011 at 10:09 AM

What you need to remember is that the coal fired plants are operating anyway whether you plug in or not.

The source of energy will not experience anything when you plug in.

Therefore, your point is bogus.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
DriftSS Sep 30 2011 at 10:40 AM
U R a moron. If the electricity plant wouldn't experience ANYTHING you would be getting free energy, which you are not. As the demand for electricity goes up, so does the coal necessary to generate the electricity. And when more people plug in and demand goes up, it will require more and more electricity producers and more emissions will be generated. Electricity is also not cheap or efficient. For example, you can save 30% in energy savings converting to natural gas heat over electricity.
.... More
Therefore you are totally bogus.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 30 2011 at 10:24 AM

Wrong, the more electricity you use, the more coal the plant has to burn, but everybody except you knows this.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 28 2011 at 3:35 PM
well, my response is, on one hand I moved to a 'liberal' state where I can use 100% green electricity and my bill is transparent unlike deep south where bill tells you nothing and ga pacific and southern co. both coal companies owned the states. in atlanta you ALWAYS had HOV lane to yourself as NOBODY ever used it....every single giant polluting hummer suv etc in deep south are sole commuters...as southerners hate sharing. the other response however is my local right wing town is very regressive
.... More
and makes it extremely hard for residential solar as most boards are illegally supporting fracking while on the board and there will never be bike lanes, HOV lanes etc. my state gives no benefit on taxes for hybrid or anything else. it is broke and seeks to make up diff. in shortfall by screwing middle class at every opportunity. if you are rich enough here, you don't need to drive anything, you have a driver. in any event, my brand new prius has already save me JUST in one year over $1000 over my previous vehicle getting 20 mpg as local gas prices are highest in nation at four bucks a gallon right now and as I had to drive a lot. I avg. 51.4 mpg. driving hybrid prius only have to get oil change every 10,000 miles saving even more dirty used oil from going into environment. electric is best, but locally might as well wait for flying saucers. go california!!!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Fattmerris Sep 28 2011 at 3:26 PM

In Texas, I have the opportunity to pay for 100% renewable wind energy. So my LEAF is truly Zero Emissions. I did not buy my LEAF for the environmental aspect though, I bought it to reduce our reliance on foriegn oil. Electricity is 100% American made. That's money right back into the economy instead of sending 50% of every dollar spent on gas, right outside the US.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
  • last »

EDITORS' PICKS

tease kids in woods

line

tease stargazing

line

tease hand

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  2. Stone Age people may have battled against a zombie apocalypse
  3. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  4. A day in the life of the human hand
  5. Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
  6. 10 false facts most people think are true
  7. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  8. Why the blues are blue
  9. What is the 'Monsanto Protection Act'?
  10. Why banning candy is a road to nowhere
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor
Green autocross shows off Mercedes F-CELL technology
Mercedes-Benz customers take the automaker's groundbreaking emission-free F-CELL car for a more...
Driving a Cleaner Tomorrow
Breakthrough traction system maintains safety on slippery roads
4MATIC all-wheel drive optimizes individual wheels enabling advanced handling and control as road more...
Driving a Cleaner Tomorrow
Zero-emissions F-CELL car a hit with green celebrities
Emitting nothing but water vapor as it cruises around the city on hydrogen power rather than fossil more...
Driving a Cleaner Tomorrow
From 60 to zero: Braking innovations boost performance
Adaptive Braking Technology from Mercedes-Benz uses sensors to predict emergency stops, allowing more...
Driving a Cleaner Tomorrow
NYC youth get 120 new coaches with Laureus USA program
Mercedes-Benz and the Laureus Sport for Good Foundation team up to train and place coaches in more...
Driving a Cleaner Tomorrow

Mercedes-Benz USA on Facebook

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered

ABOUT Jim Motavalli

New York Times contributor blogs about green transportation.

More about Jim RSS feed

Recent Posts

  • The Porsche 918 Spyder: An electrified bat out of hell
  • Cellphone driving deaths: Toll is higher than you think
  • Tesla on a roll, selling more electric cars than anyone else
+ Add this to my site
Advertisement
Advertisement
Google Profile

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS