SPECIAL FEATURES:
Email
Road taxes: Gas cars pay them, why not electric vehicles?
The issue is contentious because gasoline taxes generate $45 billion annually to pay for highway repairs.
Fri, May 06 2011 at 5:17 PM
Related Topics:
SCOTT-FREE: Should electric cars like the Nissan Leaf pay road taxes? (Photo: Flickr)
Let’s say I live in the sunny state of California, and I just bought a Nissan Leaf electric car. The car’s $32,000 bottom line would have taken a big bite, but I got a $7,500 federal tax credit and a $5,000 state cash payout. At $20,000, the Leaf is affordable, and the 3 cents a mile operating costs are good news, too.
But wait, now they want to start hitting me with new taxes? The gas jockeys say it’s not fair that they pay a premium of 18.4 cents per gallon to maintain our nation’s roads, while I pay nothing at all. That’s harsh — and here I am a crusader for clean air.
There, in a microcosm, is the debate over whether we need to reform the gas tax as the automobile electrifies. One way to do this is with a whole new system that’s agnostic to what kind of car you drive. It’s called pay-per-mile, and it would be based on how far you drove, not on what you drove to get there.
There's an issue of fairness here. Conservatives are already hollering that electric vehicles are “welfare wagons” because of the subsidies they get. John Voelcker, senior editor at High Gear Media, explains it this way: “My basic take is that I’m sympathetic to the desire of EV owners not to be taxed, but right now, there’s no mechanism by which EVs are contributing to highway funds. And because people aren’t driving as much, we face a phenomenal shortfall in the Highway Trust Fund.”
Voelcker’s research shows that U.S. gasoline use peaked in 2006, when we used 374 million gallons every day. High gas prices are also cutting into driving, and thus reducing gasoline tax payouts that pay for road repairs. That 18.4 cents (24.4 cents for diesel) is, of course, phenomenally low compared to the very high taxes Europeans pay — as much as half of the $8 they might pay per gallon. Our gas tax burden isn’t that much of a burden.
The Obama administration is toying with the idea of a pay-per-mile system, which wouldn’t be as hard to implement as it sounds. How would the government know how far you drove? The Congressional Budget Office says that electronic equipment, possibly GPS-based but not necessarily, would record how many miles you drove, then add up a bill that you’d pay, perhaps at your electric vehicle charging station.
This is not, repeat not, going to be popular with EV enthusiasts. Electric cars are expensive, so buying one requires consumers to make a leap of faith. People worry about battery life, range, charger availability and a number of other intangibles. It’s delicate right now, and throwing in a previously unknown tax could upset the balance.
Another way of looking at it: First the government gives me a tax break to buy the electric vehicle, then taxes me for driving it? That’s not a terribly logical argument, but there you are. The auto companies don’t like the idea of EV taxes, and they make the case in a similar way. Shad Balch of General Motors (which makes the Chevrolet Volt) opined: “There will be a time and place when electric vehicles should pay their fair share for road maintenance and those associated costs. But we’re not there yet. Right now, we need to create a market that incentivizes people to buy these cars.”
Paul Scott, vice president of Plug In America (and a Nissan Leaf salesman) says, "We at Plug In America think it's inappropriate to tax EVs at this early stage of development." Oil companies, he says, have been getting "huge tax breaks" for decades. Scott did add that he favors some kind of "weight/mile" tax down the road, after electric vehicles proliferate.And people who worry about the long arm of Big Brother won’t be happy, either. As Mark G., a poster on The Car Connection, put it, “Besides the possible privacy issues, it would require an entirely new infrastructure and cost a fortune to put in place. It would end up being technology based, which means that is will be easy to manipulate or cheat. Plus, it will no doubt open up plenty of loopholes for the rich/savvy to avoid being taxed. I can only guess that they will use this as a scary alternative to justify raising the gas taxes.”
By the way, the gas tax is only about 35 percent of subsidies to the U.S. road and highway system. The rest is vehicle taxes (20 percent), tolls (less than 5 percent), general fund appropriations (15 percent), borrowing (10 percent), property taxes (5 percent) and miscellaneous taxes and fees (10 percent).
It’s not just the federal government, either. States can and will tax electric vehicles, too, and they’ll find creative ways to do it. A Washington state bill would apply a $100 surcharge for EVs during the licensing process, and it’s already passed the state Senate and is awaiting action in the state House. Oregon is also considering something similar. (Pardon me, but aren’t these two states that really like electric cars?)
In the end, EVs will end up paying some kind of taxes, and they’ll continue to get tax breaks, too. Writing at CBS’ BNET, Matt DeBord guesses that most electric vehicle buyers could easily pay Washington state’s $100 fee, or other such levies applied as part of taking delivery of the car. “The cost could be rolled into a car’s purchase price, and it would become basically invisible,” he said.
That’s true, but a one-time fee is one thing and an ongoing pay-as-you-drive tax is something else again. With that, you’re going to get a big argument — nearly as big a one as you’d get if you proposed raising that long-static 18.4 cents a gallon road tax. If you haven’t heard, new taxes are off the American agenda.
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.
You might also like:
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
EDITORS' PICKS
Advertisement
TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON
- Tornado survivor finds dog during live TV interview
- Why we turn to dogs when disaster strikes
- 5 of the best-looking cars ever
- Superfoods: 11 berries to improve your health
- 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
- Rebounding from adversity: 7 cities that have survived tragedy
- Mystery cause of Irish potato famine finally solved
- This family produces 1 quart of waste in a year
- 9 habits that may do more harm than good
- 10 false facts most people think are true
From our sponsor
NEWSLETTER
ABOUT Jim Motavalli
New York Times contributor blogs about green transportation.
Advertisement
LOL. Your use of the term "eco-snob" and your exhortation for the government to "simply" raise the gas-to-mile "rates" and emission standards points to your frame of mind, 'nuff said.
Oh, that's right. It comes from traditional power plants. So besides making the drivers feel superior, how does driving one help?
The good news is that electric cars are so efficient that when you look at the little amount of electricity they use and the carbon footprint that involves compared to the impact of mining/drilling/refining then burning gasoline, the difference is tremendous. A carefully driven Prius still has more than double the carbon footprint of a well thrashed Tesla Roadster. More typically, the impact of an EV is between 1/5 & 1/10.
Give the industry a chance to get some traction before taxing the drivers. Maybe propose something for 5 years from now?
Getting people to pay for the use of roads using mileage is unlikely to work, or would be difficult to enforce. With computer engine management it is easy to buy a device to change the mileage.
What drivers should be paying for is the amount of space they take up on a road and the damage to the road. So, the bigger the car the more you would expect to pay. Take some sort of tax from tire sales. Everyone needs tires. The more you drive the more you would be paying.
Mexico and Canada will see HUGE increases in tire stores at the border, not to mention black market tires :)
They were conned into buying them with the lure of avoiding buying gas and subsequently paying the taxes that go along with it. Of course, all of you idiots who bought the con have nobody to blame but yourselves.
If we are subsidizing these vehicles, what would be the point of taxing them? That would just move the government's subsidy money over to the highway fund, after involving several layers of bureaucracy and paperwork. If the highway fund needs the money, just cut subsidies and move the saved cash.
Once electric vehicles no longer enjoy government subsidies, then taxes, for example on batteries, would be appropriate, but giving people money so they can give it back to you is foolish policy.
The reality is that it's very easy to tell when a hybrid vehicle is operating in gasoline mode or off the batteries, and that makes it easy enough to keep track of how much mileage each has been used in.
Government vehicles pay no license plate fees. How about changing that? Truck and mass transit companies are still subsidized and trucks, which produce most of the wear and tear on the roads are not held accountable for it. The roads weren't getting fixed before the electric car, so to some extent, it's an excuse. The pay per mile idea of Obama is exactly like every other of his ideas - cracked. It is not the business of the US government to know where a law-abiding citizen is at all times.
How about we just spend less on highways? We don't need all that tax revenue if we stop building new ones. The current infastructure available will more than support what we need. Rather than some new highway into the middle of the dessert people will just need to use the one we already have in Detroit.
I would prefer there be no roads in the middle of my ice cream bowl.
Wouldn't the simplest solution be to require all drivers to report an odometer reading everytime they renew the registration on the cars? Tax on the change in miles? Put simply all those mile were put on on a road...
It shouldn't be hard. I bought my first car in '93 and have always had to report my odometer reading every year when renewing my registration.
Heck, I just want the 18.4¢ "road tax" I pay every time I purchase gasoline for my lawn mower, weed-eater, snow blower and chain saw!
Thats all goverment can think about. Soon I will sell my car and walk. To heck with the taxes
Easy, get rid of tax credits and subsidies for electric cars. Then you don't need new and creative usage taxes. Both electricity and gasoline are taxed anyway. Plus, the point should be to not encourage buying a car, period. Electric cars have just as much, if not more, environmental cost to manufacture.
Pages