Free parking isn't free
A bill in California wants to make drivers pay for parking, so greener travelers aren't subsidizing Hummer drivers.
Fri, Jan 29 2010 at 8:26 PM EST
9
Photo by alancleaver_2000 Senate bills aren’t exactly considered stimulating reading material, but I think California’s SB 518 is riveting! Why? The “make drivers pay up for parking” bill lays out in vivid detail all the hidden costs of free parking! Check out this tidbit:
On a congested street, eliminating just 10 percent of vehicles can result in free-flowing traffic. The existence of “free” parking is a significant factor that encourages vehicle trips. At employment sites, employer-paid parking increases rates of driving by as much as 22 percent. Conversely, employee-paid parking reduces rates of driving by the same amount.
Written by state senator Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach), SB 518 just passed in the senate earlier this week, as the L.A. Times reports. If it becomes law, cities and counties would get financial incentives to make make parkers pay, both on the street and in government-owned lots, as well as to loosen parking requirements for businesses.
As most MNN readers know, free parking isn’t actually free. A whole book — The High Cost of Free Parking — has been dedicated to exploring this topic. In addition to the environmental costs of the driving free parking encourages, we’ve got real economic costs. When short-sighted business owners might argue that getting rid of free parking will hurt their bottom line, providing parking can actually be an onerous financial burden on many businesses. As SB 518 points out:
The high cost of land, construction, and maintenance to provide free parking adds significantly to the cost of economic development, making many housing and commercial developments, especially those on infill or transit-oriented sites, financially infeasible and hindering economic development strategies.
And of course, many of the costs of “free” parking are actually paid for by taxpayers and consumers — regardless of whether or not they drive! From SB 518:
Moreover, when parking is provided free to the user, these costs are hidden elsewhere in the cost of doing business. Free parking at stores is paid for by all customers in higher prices for goods, including those customers who do not drive.
Even right now, de-car-ing already can save you a lot of money on gas, insurance, and maintenance fees. But imagine if your bill was also $5 less every time you biked over to shop at Whole Foods — because the shoppers who decided to drive 3 blocks had to pay $5 for parking instead of getting free valet.
Imagine if bars weren’t required by law to provide a whole lot of parking to drinkers who probably shouldn’t be driving when leaving the bar anyway. Maybe then drinks would get cheaper — and we’d have fewer drunk driving accidents!
Or imagine if your rent was $200 less a month because you didn’t have to pay for the parking spot you don’t use. Even if your apartment doesn’t come with a spot, if you’re car free, you’re helping to pay for street parking — which is free in most neighborhoods. Imagine how much you’d save if neighborhood street parking wasn’t free, and if parking permits reflected the true cost of street parking.
That’s the idea behind SB 518 — and I hope you’ll now encourage your assemblymembers to support it so it becomes law. I highly recommend reading the bill as leisure reading — It’s entertaining and refreshing!
If SB 510 makes you feel hopeful, you’ll be glad to know that more local initiatives in the L.A. area are poised to make parking more expensive too. Santa Monica decided recently to make parkers pay higher prices at city-owned parking lots. And L.A.’s looking into privatizing 10 public parking garages — a move that’s likely to make parking more expensive.
Driving — or driving badly — is also getting more expensive. The LA Times reports that tickets for parking and moving violation are getting pricier, as are traffic school fees. All those pay-more-to-drive moves in L.A. are intended to help close up its budget shortfall. If we can balancing the budget by discourage driving, I’m all for it!
I was so encouraged by the news of SB 518 passing in the senate that I finally went to the library and checked out The High Cost of Free Parking — a book I’d put off reading, despite the fact that I’m a proud Shoupista, because at 752 pages (605 minus the backmatter), the thing’s enormous. I’m proud to say I did not drive to the library and take advantage of the city’s free 2-hour parking lots! I call walking home toting this tome in my reusable bag my exercise for the day –
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those
providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of
MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies
with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy
of any of their information.
 WorldShares
lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20
points now.Learn More Earn Points
|
Twitter
Stumble
Digg
Share
CLOSE
link:
link:
| Previous Post Recycle your bra | Next Post Why you should attend public transit community meetings |
Comments
Scott Mace
05/24/2010 02:09 AM
The state Assembly and the author done gone and neutered it.
http://urbification.blogspot.com/2010/05/sb-518-parking-reform-bill-amen...
Marvin B
02/24/2010 11:45 AM
Okay people lets get down to the real issue here!. This bill is not about the environment, its really about politians paid off by MASS TRANSIT, MTA to gradually push more and more people out of their cars and in to mass transit! The environment is a concern but corporations have been using this issue as a global excuse to generate billions in new revenue. They are the ones destroying the enviroment, but they make it our responsibility to "protect it" and make us pay the bill! Wake up everybody!.... More
Leila
02/09/2010 20:13 PM
Great Idea. Let's completely destroy California's economy by making it harder for people to visit merchants. Then we can all live in tents and compost all of our trash!
Rick in Encinitas
02/09/2010 13:21 PM
Be careful Siel, too many glasses of that Enviro Cool-Aid may leave you as drunk as Alan. On the other hand, drink up will Alan and the gang. By morning, SB 518 will be removed and you won't remember a thing.
Jay
02/02/2010 19:23 PM
...for milking. That's all. If I have to pay for parking at some business, they will be cut out from my patronage and I will buy online. Goods delivered to my door. Yeah I guess we could all stay home instead of driving around and dropping money into some business. These Sacramento leeches need to be cut off. Vote them out.
Democrat in Los Angeles
02/01/2010 13:07 PM
Dumb. Dumb. Dumb. Does this mean we don't have to build houses with garages or car ports? Big savings in pollution Alan!!! Also building a house without bathrooms and kitchens saves tons of water too!!!
Sacramento, just kidding, pleeeeease do not implement my suggestions above as new legislation. What nut cases.
Sam Johnson
01/30/2010 14:12 PM
More non sense from the dopes in Sacramento. This is another punish California bill.
If you want to really do something start there is ONE clean & easy way to cut the budget. Every state employee, senator & legislatur takes a 30% salary cut & a 50% benefit package cut.
We would all be just fine with that legislation. We would like it even more to return to 1970 state employee levels.
Jankim
01/30/2010 03:13 AM
Guess nothing is left tax and now they're making things up from thin air. Why doesn't the author of this article first address the wasteful spending by the state government?
What A Joke
01/29/2010 22:48 PM
What's next are you going to start charging people for walking down the sidewalk. Everyone votes no on all the props and now they get creative with other ways for charging us more money. I say cut the state government and get rid of all of them.
