Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Tuesday, June 18, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Health › Fitness & Well-Being
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
What's wrong with high fructose corn syrup?
It's in everything. So what's in the syrup?

By

Vanessa Vadim
Mon, Mar 02 2009 at 10:18 AM
 17

Related Topics:

Healthy Eating, Ask Vanessa, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Mercury (the element)
Corn with biohazard signDear Vanessa,
 
I’ve been told that I should avoid high-fructose corn syrup, and yesterday I read that there is mercury in the syrup. Why would mercury be in a food product, anyway? And what’s the problem with corn syrup in general?
 
— Feeling Corny in the Heartland
 
Dear Corny,
 
There are many issues about high-fructose corn syrup, all of them connected to corn-focused industrial agriculture, a practice that is destroying our health and our environment.
 
Let's start with corn. How did we transform a native grain that sustained myriad cultures for thousands of years into a symbol of everything that's wrong with our economy, agriculture and health? (This will be an exercise in restraint for me. I will do my best to ignore that high-fructose corn syrup, or HFCS, originates in a simple corn field and focus on the complex problems surrounding this sticky, adulterated version of corn-stuff.)
 
So what’s the problem with HFCS? It is a highly processed, unnatural product, yet it is often sold under “all natural” labels. It is artificially cheap because of America's massive corn subsidies. And though it's calorie-rich, it's nutritionally impoverished. HFCS is also a significant cause of the obesity pandemic — just look at the way the rapid rise in obesity mirrors the rise in HFCS consumption.
 
The Corn Refiners Association disagrees, and their pro-HFCS campaign can be found here. Food manufacturers, not growers, are bound to the product. It acts as a preservative, extending the shelf life of foods, yet it's cheaper than sugar and other natural sweeteners.
 
A bit of history
HFCS was introduced in 1970. By 1990, consumption of it had increased 1000 percent. HFCS is now found in almost all caloric sweeteners which are added to foods and beverages in the U.S. It can be found in soft drinks and fruit drinks, candied and canned fruits, dairy products like ice cream and yogurt, bread and baked goods, cereals, jellies, ketchup, BBQ sauce, salad dressing — even vitamins and supplements — and overwhelmingly in foods marketed to children. In short, HFCS is found in most processed foods, and it is difficult to avoid. Every American consumes an average of 60 pounds of HFCS a year.
 
HFCS’s connection to obesity, diabetes and heart disease lies in the way our bodies react to the substance. Unlike glucose, fructose does not stimulate insulin secretion or enhance leptin production, both key processes in appetite regulation and fat storage. Instead, fructose forms the backbone for triacylglycerols. Elevated levels of triacylglycerols prevent leptin from reaching the brain and are linked to an increased risk of heart disease. Why does that matter? Without leptin, the brain doesn’t send out the signal to stop eating. There is no caloric difference between the two sugars, but glucose is readily absorbed and allows the brain to signal that we’ve had enough food.
 
Simply put, fructose leads our bodies to store more calories as fat, and leads us to overeat because we don’t feel full.
 
A USDA study that compared rats fed a high-fructose diet to those fed glucose found disastrous results from the fructose diet. The male rats did not reach adulthood, had anemia, high cholesterol and heart hypertrophy — which means their hearts enlarged until they exploded — and their testicles didn’t develop properly. Female rats were not as dramatically affected, but they were unable to produce live babies. The results were exacerbated by copper deficiency, a fairly common deficiency in Americans. Dr. Meira Field, who led the study, notes that while "every cell in the body can metabolize glucose … fructose must be metabolized in the liver. The livers of the rats on the high-fructose diet looked like the livers of alcoholics, plugged with fat and cirrhotic." Yum.
 
And now, add a bit of mercury
The newest HFCS scandal arose from two recent studies. The first, peer-reviewed and published in Environmental Health — abstract here; PDF here — found detectable levels of mercury in nine of 20 samples of commercial HFCS. The second study by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), a nonprofit watchdog group, found that nearly one in three of 55 brand-name foods contained mercury. The chemical was found most commonly in dairy products, dressings and condiments containing HFCS.
 
This, at least, is an avoidable consequence of HFCS consumption. Of the many chemicals required to make HFCS, caustic soda and hydrochloric acid, can contain traces of mercury. These two chemicals, made the same way as chlorine, can be produced in two ways. One involves pumping saltwater through a vat of mercury; the other does not. AsDr. David Wallinga of the IATP stated, "Mercury is toxic in all its forms. Given how much high-fructose corn syrup is consumed by children, it could be a significant additional source of mercury never before considered. We are calling for immediate changes by industry and the [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] to help stop this avoidable mercury contamination of the food supply." The good news is that the industry is heeding the call and moving away from this “mercury grade” process.
 
More peeves over HFCS? You bet. I find it ridiculous that the substance can be marketed as “natural.” While the Corn Refiners Association claims high-fructose corn syrup is made from corn, has no artificial ingredients, has the same calories as sugar and is fine to eat in moderation, there is nothing “natural” about it. Does it originate in corn? Absolutely. But HFCS cannot be found in corn or anywhere else in nature. 
 
Manufacturing HFCS requires a long series of mechanical processes and chemical reactions, including the introduction of three different enzymes to incite molecular rearrangements. Genetically modified corn, molecularly altered by genetically engineered enzymes … how can that be considered natural?
 
The environmental costs
I know I said I’d refrain from a diatribe on corn, but I must tell you about the environmental costs of HFCS. 
 
"The environmental footprint of HFCS is deep and wide," says Michael Pollan, author and journalist extraordinaire. "Look no farther than the dead zone in the Gulf [of Mexico,] an area the size of New Jersey where virtually nothing will live because it has been starved of oxygen by the fertilizer runoff coming down the Mississippi from the Corn Belt. Then there is the atrazine in the water in farm country — a nasty herbicide that, at concentrations as little as 0.1 part per billion, has been shown to turn male frogs into hermaphrodites." 
 
Industrial agriculture grows only corn, with no crop rotation. This practice depletes soil nutrients, requires more pesticides and fertilizers, and leads to the loss of topsoil. And, of course, milling and chemically altering corn to make high-fructose corn syrup is energy-intensive.
 
So, there you’ve got it: my take on HFCS. Now, ask me about corn … 
 
Keep it Green,

Vanessa 

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 17
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
arjuna707
arjuna707 Aug 26 2012 at 2:19 PM
Hi, first of all I would like to say that I don't like corn syrup. Have any of you ever tasted it? I have, it's gross. HOWEVER! When you make irresponsible claims such as that fructose does not cause the body to release insulin, you lose a lot of credibility. First of all, fructose IS glucose. Fructose is a bisaccharide formed from the bonding of glucose and sucrose. When you eat it, your body lyses the molecule into its component parts and uses it. Because of this extra step it is not as
.... More
dangerous as pure glucose which can cause blood sugar spikes leading to insulin spikes and from there to type II diabetes. Secondly, you point out that it is not natural. You mean like sugar, bread, potato chips, anything cooked? Most of what we eat is not naturally occurring. Does that mean it's good? No, but it also doesn't mean it's bad either. Sugar is a crystallized derivative of the sugar cane plant. In Hawaii where it is grown, they BURN it down to make it easier to harvest. The industry operates in the red, only surviving through MASSIVE government subsidies which have to do more with its transportation than it's production. Have you ever tried cane juice. It's delicious, full of nutrients (obviously since sugars are one of the only three types of nutrients used by animals), and has many different vitamins and minerals which have to be removed to make those nice clear little crystals. I came on here looking for some data to help me understand why corn syrup has so many unhealthy claims about it. Your unsubstantiated rant HELPS the industry which has a choke hold on our country (ever heard of the corn vote?). I've always considered corn syrup to be the lowest quality sugar. Not because it has fructose in it, but because of the other components of the syrup. Finding trace amounts of mercury in it is bad. Not as bad as eating tuna, but we don't eat nearly as much tuna. It would be very helpful if you could get some real numbers in there next time.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
PA Jul 25 2012 at 1:01 PM
Just a tidbit on the approximate viscosities of common liquids. Of note: Compare water, honey and corn syrup in the table below. Liquid Viscosity in Centipoise @ 70°F Sulfuric Acid 0.2 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.4 Water 1 Milk 3 Oil – Crude 15 Ethylene Glycol 16 Oil – Auto SAE 10 65
.... More
Oil – Corn 72 Oil – Auto SAE 20 125 Oil – Auto SAE 30 200 Varnish – Spar 420 Oil – Auto SAE 60 1,000 Honey 3,000 Ink 45,000 Vaseline Petroleum Jelly 64,000 Corn Syrup 110,000
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Dee Jun 21 2012 at 9:44 PM
The author complains that high fructos syrup is found in everything and hard to avoid. The same can be said about wheat. After "experts" declared wheat bread was healthier than white manufacturers started making it the frst ingredient in every food and it can hardly be avoided now. And have you noticed you cant even buy chewing gum anymore that doesnt have apartame just because some people need to avoid sugar? So now those who cant tolerate aspartame get headaches instead. And before that it was
.... More
take caffeine out of everything. THE PROLEM IS excessiveness whether by food preparers or by individual consumption not the basic product itself.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Mary E. Jun 18 2012 at 12:40 PM
Hey! Need a referee here! LOL! Look, our bodies were designed to function beautifully on real, unadulterated, living, God-created food. All of our organs need TOP fuel. We are supposed to, and are designed to live well for 120 years. We are crashing and burning several decades short. We are over eating because our organs are still looking for some shred of nutrients it can recognize to use as fuel to do all the jobs they are created to handle. Gee why am I not full after eating an entire huge bag
.... More
of chips??? Because my organs are screaming, COULD YA PLEASE THROW SOME REAL NUTRIENTS DOWN HERE?? I DON'T RECOGNIZE THIS CRAP SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH IT, GUESS I'LL JUST STORE IT HERE IN A NEW FAT CELL. Money could care less about what diseases we have. they want money and only money. so they create junk on all the shelves that will out live us. If you choose food that will last a longer time on the shelf, you can bet you will last a shorter time on the earth. Between Monsanto and Con Agra, and big Pharma, they are all making it more difficult to find foods that make and keep us healthy. God made it perfect, man makes it dangerous. If we are not buying most of your food from the produce section and from farm markets, God have mercy on us all. And if we say we don't like vegetables, it's really time to put on our big boy briefs or big girl panties and learn to love them. Hey, I'm just sayin'...
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Kintu Feb 24 2012 at 10:28 AM

Vanessa, correlation is not same as causation - "just look at the way the rapid rise in obesity mirrors the rise in HFCS consumption" isn't useful. Also you have no actual references to the studies that support your point.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
B Dec 19 2010 at 12:47 AM
Really? People are going to go hyper-vigilante over HFCS and then STILL think that things like Aspertame, Sucralose or any of the other artificial sweeteners are "safe". I can't eat ANYTHING with any artificial sweetener in it. If I do, I get massive headaches, stomach cramps and all sorts of other ailments. At first, I thought I was just "weird" but after a little research, I've found that the physical side-effects of these types of sweeteners are very common. Personally, I do not think they taste
.... More
very much like sugar (even things like "Stevia" which is made from sugar DO NOT taste natural and cause pretty much the same side-effects in those affected). I may be more sensitive to artificial sweeteners than most, however, I still do not allow my children to ingest anything with artificial sweeteners in it. (I know, some things like toothpaste contain these things are are nearly impossible to avoid.) A few years back I remember reading an article detailing a "new" artificial sweetener that had been created (perhaps it was Stevia - it seems to be in the right time period). Anyways, looking at the pictures of these sweeteners magnified 500-1000X REALLY made it apparent that they are bad news in all of their incarnations. Doing a side-by-side comparison between "real vs. artificial" and the differences were readily apparent to even the most scientifically-challenged of my family members. Simply put, I'm not an activist that is going to go out and picket the companies making this stuff, but I do make an active effort NOT to purchase products containing these things whenever I can. I would MUCH rather my kids eat something with HFCS in it that something that (under the microscope) looks like a chemistry students failed project (which, incidentally, some of the artificial sweeteners WERE chemistry mistakes - think about it). Tolerating all of these blatantly artificial sweeteners (which are required to disclaim that they have been found to be carcinogenic) while slamming a sweetener that so far has done MUCH LESS damage is completely hypocritical. In fact, it screams of someone who jumps on whichever propaganda wagon rolls by their house that week. It's today's scapegoat so that people will forget about yesterday's criminals.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
veritas Dec 17 2010 at 1:10 AM
Industrial agriculture? No crop rotation? Have you ever been to the midwest? First "industrial agriculture" and "factory farms" are labels made up by liberal bedwetters because family farms have such a good reputation. Almost all farms in the US are family farms. Second, nearly all crops are rotated yearly, around here between corn and soybeans. Third, corn actually helps reduce erosion and builds organic matter in the soil, something the soybeans do not. Try to get educated about agriculture
.... More
instead of spouting M. Pollan's propoganda.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Lauren Feb 21 2011 at 3:40 PM

I beg to differ... I am from rural South Dakota, and family farms, especially those completely unaffected by big GMO businesses like Syngenta and Monsanto, are becoming harder and harder to find. Additionally, large majority of farmers in my area are trucking most of their corn to the nearby ethanol plant. But that's another story.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
mj
mj Dec 10 2010 at 1:27 AM

I'm an elementary school teacher and I find the rise in diabetes among students alarming. I really wonder about the connection to HFCS.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Jeannie Hughes Apr 06 2011 at 2:03 PM
The best thing I ever did for my son was make him a sack lunch every morning before school. Getting him off of school lunch was not easy, however. The first thing I discovered was that I had to change what I called lunch food. I learned a lot. Now my entire family is "off the sauce" as we call it. That means not consuming any processed foods whatsoever. That's harder than you might think. But now, all of a sudden, my son gets no more headaches, hasn't been sick since, and can finally read.
.... More
No kidding. The miracles in my family were vast. Processed food for our "convenience" is killing us. I know that for sure and it's not just my opinion. Good luck!!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Brad Nov 04 2010 at 2:39 PM

I am trying to do a report on HFCS and I cannot find anywhere that actually states the names of all chemicals that make up HFCS? Can anyone out there provide a list?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
whisperingsage Jun 29 2010 at 12:17 PM
I have found some of the rat and mouse studies, and it appears that when the study in its highly technical language refers to "chronic pressure overload" or "hypertrophy" authors such as this seem to think it meant their hearts "exploded". There is enough reference to the bad things that really did happen, let's please not exaggerate! it is not necessary. There are people walking around now with congestive heart failure. They don't die of exploding hearts. But this is an equivalent of what happened
.... More
to the rats. Yes, CHF causes problems, and makes life a misery. But it is NOT an explosion!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
steve Jan 27 2010 at 11:57 AM
I am not a bio chemist but I have taken YEARS of gen chem, organic chem and a year of bio chem. first, fructose, a 5 carbon molecule, is not so "easily" converted into glycerol to aid in the production of triglycerides. furthermore, high fructose corn syrup has equal amounts of glucose and fructose. well, so does table sugar or cane suger (sucrose). should we not eat table sugar as well? no more baking sweets! and have you seen how much fructose is in fruits? there is a LOT more fructose in a 12
.... More
oz glass of juice than there is in a soda! in fact, most juice have the same fructose to glucose ratio as soda. which is roughly 1:1. Apple juice has twice as much fructose than glucose. but when you consider that juice as more calories and thus more sugar per volume, you would find that a cup (8oz) of juice would have about the same amount of fructose as a 12oz soda. i agree that we may be consuming too much but if there nothing wrong with having a fruit a day or a glass of juice a day then there nothing wrong with having a soda a day. one could EASILY argue that drinking soda is more healthier than fruit. Fruit really doesn't contain many nutrients. I get a thousand time as much from a once a day vitamin and ten times as much from a cup of cereal, and just as much Vit-C from drinking a Hi-C.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
whisperingsage Jun 29 2010 at 12:33 PM
I know chemists like to say a lot of things are the same, when they aren't. That's why they end up working for industries that destroy our health. Did your organic chemistry class explain the difference between simple and complex carbs? Mine didn't. But I know there is a difference. Whole wheat vs refined wheat means the carbs need time sitting in digestive enzymes to be broken down, so the carbs are digested slowly. (in whole grain). There are minerals and vitamins connected that need to be separated
.... More
out and broken down, and fatty acids and amino acids,and lignan and cellulose etc. They never showed us in my organic chem class, what a whole food complex looked like all hitched up to those things. They simplified it so we could see one molecule at a time. This is a world of importance for a diabetic or a hyperinsulinism patient. The whole grain version of sugar is evaporated cane juice ( and still contains the minerals and other nutrients). Yes, fruits are really still simple carbs, because they start absorbing in the very mucous membranes of the mouth. Yes we should still limit our fruit fructose. We really aren't designed for high refined carbs and we are seeing such huge rises in diabetes. We bake our own and use evaporated cane juice, which was illegal here until about 10 years ago. But I still don't pig out on those either. The healthiest people in the Weston a Price studies had none of those sorts of foods.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Mike Nov 05 2009 at 4:47 AM

If you don't like the environmental footprint of HFCS, you must really hate ethanol which is causing much more corn to be grown. It's also raising our food and gasoline costs.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Russell Levine Oct 31 2009 at 4:17 PM

Put another way, HFCS is the exact opposite of the magical pill that would allow us to loose weight while making no other changes in our lifestyle or diet. Couch potatoes rejoice-NOT!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 03 2009 at 11:29 PM

You left out honey bee colony collapse.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

EDITORS' PICKS

tease BBQ grills

line

tease bees

line

tease road trip

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. Watch: Sir David Attenborough deals with a band of cannibals the British way
  2. Facepalm of the week: Non-GMO salt!?
  3. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  4. What a grocery store without bees looks like
  5. Yurts: Everything you ever wanted to know but were afraid to ask
  6. 7 surprising things Pope Francis has done in his first 100 days
  7. 5 recipes for garlic scapes
  8. 10 false facts most people think are true
  9. How to clean brass naturally
  10. Amazing river map shows U.S. awash in waterways
+ Add this to my site

MNN'S ADVICE TEAM

Matt Hickman (Mondays)
Eco-friendly blogger.
Morieka Johnson (Wednesdays)
Beauty and pets aficionado.
Chanie Kirschner (Fridays)
Smart and funny maven. 
Best of MNN
Some of our favorite Q&As.
Vanessa Vadim
Eco-activist and consultant.
Lazy Environmentalist 
Author and television host.

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS