SPECIAL FEATURES:
The truth about getting the flu shot
To most medical professionals, the advantages of the flu vaccine far outweigh any risks. But other professionals feel completely the opposite.
Mon, Oct 15 2012 at 11:22 AM
Related Topics:
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, on average 5 to 20 percent of the population in the U.S. gets the flu each year. More than 200,000 people are hospitalized from seasonal flu-related complications, and anywhere from a few thousand to 50,000 people die each year from flu.
The best way to prevent getting the flu, says the CDC, is by getting a seasonal flu vaccination each year. But do the benefits of getting the flu shot far outweigh the risks? Can potential lethal illnesses manifest years later in life, a direct result from getting yearly flu shots?
The truth about getting the flu vaccine is difficult to ascertain, with opinions about its safety differing widely depending on which medical professional you ask.
The flu shot does not give you the flu, most of the time
One thing both proponents and opponents of the flu shot agree on is that there are a few different types of flu vaccines, and sometimes, adverse side effects do occur from the shot.
Currently, there are four types of flu vaccines on the market:
- A standard flu shot
- A high-dose flu shot for those 65 and older
- An intradermal-administered shot for those who are needle-phobic
- A nasal spray
Contrary to what many people believe, the first three vaccines listed above do not contain the live flu virus.
“The vaccine is taken from two of the hundreds of different proteins that compose an influenza virus,” says the Mayo Clinic and Infectious Disease Society of America's Dr. Greg Poland. “Taking merely two surface proteins off the virus does not mean it’s live; there’s no organism there … it’s not possible to cause infection or disease with it … the flu shot does not give you the flu,” adds Poland.
As for the nasal spray, which does contain live flu viruses, Dr. Dan Harper, who is against vaccinations of all kinds, is especially leery of this methodology.
“You have 100 million viruses sprayed up the nose, along with other things like MSG (monosodium glutamate) and sugar, which causes inflammation. And since the virus also contains egg [proteins], you run the risk of introducing an avian retrovirus, which can cause encephalitis in humans.
“And so here you are spraying this up into your nose, just a few millimeters from the brain with MSG traveling across the blood-brain barrier, causing potential damage to neurotransmitters,” says Harper, who is based Solana Beach, Calif.
Does the government conclude that flu shots are 100 percent safe and effective?
No, but close to it, though adverse side effects have been documented in peer-reviewed medical journals. For example, a study in Human and Experimental Toxicology reported that there were 590 fetal-loss reports per 1 million pregnant women vaccinated (or 1 per 1,695) during the 2009-2010 flu season (generally regarded as October-March, though flu symptoms can occur any time of the year). The adverse events were tracked by the appropriately named Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, database.
In a review of vaccines conducted by researchers at the Institute of Biosecurity at St. Louis University, the co-authors concluded, “Vaccination remains a critical intervention during pandemics, but current production technology requires several months to develop sufficient vaccine to meet anticipated worldwide need…. Vaccines for use … during an epidemic are in development but … logistical obstacles to timely distribution exist [though] intensive research is underway to identify a universal vaccine.”
The Institutes of Medicine released a consensus report last year, which concluded that despite 135 vaccine adverse events in the study, few health problems are caused by or clearly associated with vaccines, including the flu shot.
According to most peer-reviewed research, the chances of encountering problems are statistically minimal; however, possible adverse effects from flu vaccine documented in medical literature include:
- Febrile seizure
- Narcolepsy
- Asthma
- Guillain-Barré syndrome
Humane reasons to get the flu shot
Some medical professionals, such as Dr. Elizabeth Baorto, division director of Pediatric Infectious Disease at Goryeb Children’s Hospital in Morristown, N.J., strongly believe that with rare exception — such as someone with an egg allergy — everybody 6 months and older should get a flu shot every year.
Some medical professionals, such as Dr. Elizabeth Baorto, division director of Pediatric Infectious Disease at Goryeb Children’s Hospital in Morristown, N.J., strongly believe that with rare exception — such as someone with an egg allergy — everybody 6 months and older should get a flu shot every year.
“Protecting oneself is an altruistic act. By getting vaccinated, you not only protect yourself, but you protect those around you as well,” says Baorto. “We are fortunate that we have a cheap and effective way of protecting ourselves with the flu vaccine.”
Will the flu shot protect you from a superbug pandemic outburst?
Not according to the aforementioned ardent vaccine opponent Harper (who is on the board of the nonprofit, Price-Pottenger Nutrition Foundation), who himself contracted polio in 1952, was paralyzed for seven years, and has seven children, none of whom have ever been vaccinated.
Harper thinks the flu vaccine lacks efficacy because the CDC has to guess which strain of influenza will be dominant in a particular year and it doesn't always guess correctly.
“[The CDC] only choose three to five strains of influenza A out of 250-plus strains, and they take only two or three influenza B strains out of 75-100 that are out there at any one time. If they don’t guess the right one, you’re going to get sick. You’re putting your faith in the CDC’s ability to guess the one that might be a pandemic.”
So, is it in your best interest to get the flu vaccine, regardless if a superbug is headed our way?
Poland unequivocally thinks so. “Which risk would you take?” he asks: “One in a million of a side effect or a one in 10,000 risk being hospitalized or dying. Flu-related illnesses cost the U.S. $90 billion a year, or almost one percent of GDP,” adds Poland.
But in contrast, Harper believes the risks of the flu shot far outweigh any benefit.
He claims that formaldehyde is an ingredient in the common flu shot and is a known carcinogen. “Another ingredient in the flu shot, thimerosal, contains mercury, which is known to impair neurological and immune systems. There are detergents, antibiotics, chemicals and allergens like polysorbate-80 that causes infertility,” adds Harper, along with other ingredients he deems unsafe for human consumption.
Indeed, the CDC does list some of these ingredients on its website. But the CDC claims, that at least in the case of thimerosal, “There is no evidence of harm caused by the small amounts of thimerosal in flu vaccine.”
Still, Harper is not convinced: “Someone who gets vaccinated could say, ‘Well the flu didn’t kill me.’ But when you’re sitting there with Alzheimer’s, ALS, MS or you’re watching your kid develop seizures or become autistic you’re going to kick yourself in the butt for allowing your child or you yourself receiving it. It’s frightening to me the stuff they put in the vaccine. These diseases, at least in part, are because of vaccines,” concludes Harper.
Do you think the flu vaccine is safe? Join the conversation in the comment section below.
Judd Handler is a health writer in Encinitas, Calif., and the author of "Living Healthy: 10 Steps."
Related flu stories on MNN:
- 10 flu-fighting foods [Photo gallery]
- CDC: It's time to get your flu shot!
- Google can help predict flu outbreaks
- Flu vaccine side effects
You might also like:
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.

Email












OOOHHHH!!!! Formaldehyde!! Guess he doesn't know the food he eats has organophosphate insecticide residue on it, which is related to nerve gas agents! Yeah he's gonna die of the flu because he doesn't want cancer from a 1 time shot.
More illiteracy. Handler should be fired for this article
And this tinfoil hat wearing Dr. Dan Harper should have his license pulled.
He doesn't have a license to pull. He's a "doctor" of homeopathy - in other words, he's not a doctor.
Additionally, you'll note the reference to fetal demise in this article cites a number of deaths (1 in 1695 pregancy losses for vaccinated mothers). The rate of fetal demise in 2007, per the Center for Disease Control, for ALL pregnancies, was 6 per 1000. So, the numbers cited in this article and reported to VAERS actually demonstrated a LOWER fetal demise rate than the all-cause CDC reported rate. However, don't let fact get in the way of your fervently held beliefs.
Exactly right. I'm 58. As a child growing up in Pittsburgh, I remember seeing the people in the iron lungs, suffering from polio. And I remember getting one of the first polio vaccine shots from Jonas Salk at the University of Pittsburgh where it was developed. Polio is GONE in this country, when it used to cause tens of thousands of deaths and disease. This article by Handler is pathetic as are the vaccine opponents
Bob, you should be fired. You sound like an angry, ignorant, brainwashed person. Also, I would recommend you buy a blow job.
Yeah people who lie and want to kill children kind of get me angry
And I thought it was "You need a blow job more than any white man in Asia"...Robin Williams in "Good Morning Vietnam".
You got a vaccine from Salk? Wow. I've had the opportunity to do a lot of third world medicine, I've seen measles and mumps, I've seen kids deformed by German measles, beggar children crippled by polio.... preventable. All preventable. And certainly NOT by taking vitamin D (though I'd love to give that to them as well!).
Russian roulette,i would rather die from natural causes than die because a mad scientist wants to shoot me up with some bug in a jar.the flu is natural,the shot is not.
Yea, life was so much better back in the all-natural 13th century.
Amoebic dysentery is natural, care for some of that? Bronchial pneumonia is natural, care to die of that, eschewing a mad scientist's "unnatural" antibiotics? Appendicitis is a natural risk... gonna forgo the "unnatural" surgery that could save your life? Please.
I bet you take antibiotics if you get an infection in spite of the fact they're just as natural as the flu. God what shoddy logic!
Wave the vaccination banana, and watch all the anti-vax monkeys start howling.
People's comments are awesome and show why we need better science education. You getting a flu shot and getting the flu means nothing. Me getting the flu shot and not getting the flu also means nothing. Its the population as a whole that's important...not one individual eating exactly 27 grapes everyday who doesn't get the flu.
I will also add, I believe pregnant women should only get the mercury free version,it is available, it's a miniscule amount, but less exposure is better. It is certainly no where near the amount found in certain fish, or in soil and water in mining areas, (as well as arsenic) not even close.
You are better off getting a pneumonia shot that with a flu shot.
.
If you're in the risk group for pneumonia, you should get both. Although the pneumonia vaccine is only needed once every five(?) years.
pneumonia shots are only recommended for those 65 and older or those with chronic serious illness, and they are NOT given yearly. Also they only protect against pneumoccocal pneumonia. Strep and other organisms as well as viruses can also cause pneumonia
Never had the flu shot and never will. I prevent the flu by eating healthy and taking extra vitamin D. Why do you think the flu doesn't happen in the summer? You get plenty of vitamin D from the sun. Less sun in the Winter, so you need extra vitamin D. Flu shots are the biggest money making scam around.
Pages